Is the Democrat Party in Nebraska trying to induce voter fraud? sure looks that way to me.
The inclusion of a voter registration form in a “welcome” gift basket designed for refugee families is eyebrow-raising. Individuals with refugee status in the United States are only allowed to naturalize after they spend a minimum of five years in the U.S. and obtain permanent residence (a green card). But presumably, individuals who accept a “welcome” basket are new arrivals to the U.S. and have not met the requirements to become citizens. They would be ineligible to register to vote.
Best of luck with your Castle doctrine defense, bunkie. That's not how it works.
Hamad “acknowledged” that the fight had ended at the point where he went into the house and retrieved his gun, the filing says. He also acknowledged that the five were in the van when he walked the 70 feet from his front door to the van and fired nine to 10 shots at the five.
When the bullets ran out, Hamad went back into the house and got a second ammunition magazine. “Again, he did not call 911, lock himself securely in his home and wait for police,” the filing says.
When he arrived at the van a second time, he fired the fatal shot into the back of Josh Haber, 19, while Haber tried to get back into the van. He also fired at Shively and Hendrickson as they fled on foot, the filing says.
Gog_Magog_Carpet_Reclaimers
at March 24, 2017 11:55 AM
Of course guys manage to make YOUR orgasm about themselves.
________________________________________
Haven't read it yet, but doesn't that, in a way, make things worse for men?
From sexologist Eleanor Hamilton:
"Myth: A man has to 'make' a girl come. It's the man's responsibility to 'bring' the woman. The truth is that unless a woman can 'bring' herself, she has a poor chance of 'coming' with any man. Orgasm is something that each partner is responsible for and something they share together, as they would a wonderful dance requiring skill from both. No one would expect a dancer, for example, to create a fine ballet with a partner who had never practiced walking, let alone dancing. A man can be a willing and patient teacher, and he can learn how a woman likes to be made love to, but he cannot 'make' her 'come.' She has to do that for herself."
lenona
at March 24, 2017 11:56 AM
From Purdue University:
"IUPUI study finds participants feel moral outrage toward those who decide to not have children."
..."What's remarkable about our findings is the moral outrage participants reported feeling toward a stranger who decided to not have children," Ashburn-Nardo said. "Our data suggests that not having children is seen not only as atypical, or surprising, but also as morally wrong."
lenona
at March 24, 2017 12:03 PM
Here's the study itself:
"Parenthood as a Moral Imperative? Moral Outrage and the Stigmatization of Voluntarily Childfree Women and Men"
What's interesting, as someone pointed out, is that contrary to what Ashburn-Nardo expected, childfree men elicited just as much outrage as childfree women.
lenona
at March 24, 2017 12:08 PM
"childfree men elicited just as much outrage"
Only from the 'smug marrieds'.
Gog_Magog_Carpet_Reclaimers
at March 24, 2017 12:39 PM
"Consistent with many personal anecdotes, participants rated voluntarily child-free men and women as significantly less fulfilled than men and women with children," Ashburn-Nardo said.
"This effect was driven by feelings of moral outrage -- anger, disapproval and disgust -- toward the voluntarily child-free people."
Right. I'm asked to GUESS as to who may be LESS FULFILLED and my GUESS is due to MORAL OUTRAGE.
Oh yeah. I get that a lot.
Bob in Texas
at March 24, 2017 2:05 PM
I'm reasonably sure that most psychologists would, in fact, call feelings like anger, disapproval and disgust "moral outrage."
Granted, maybe the people at Bratfree are closer to accurate when they call it "jealousy." Or, "misery loves company."
Of course, happy parents are generally not the judgmental ones in the first place.
Btw, Crid, I don't get that line: "Let's not act like everything is normal."
lenona
at March 24, 2017 2:31 PM
As opposed to unhappy parents, I should have clarified. Not that there's any shortage of judgmental CF folk, but at least they generally WAIT for someone to ask for their opinions!
lenona
at March 24, 2017 2:34 PM
Only from the 'smug marrieds'.
___________________________________
Meaning?
I just want to be sure I understand.
lenona
at March 24, 2017 2:41 PM
I'm calling BS lenona (not on you lass but the authors). If the participants expressed "anger, disapproval and disgust" why not just say so. (Crickets?) Why name these expressions something else?
It's because the authors studied "Based on the logic of backlash theory and research on retributive justice, the present research examined moral outrage as [A] mechanism through which voluntarily child free targets are perceived less favorably than are targets with children for violating the prescribed social role of parent-hood."
Lies are nice and easy when you control the words instead of simply letting others use their own words.
"Our data suggests that not having children is seen not only as atypical, or surprising, but also as morally wrong." '
The authors purposely used "morally wrong" not the participants (unless that was their only word choice for "less fulfilled". Stopped reading after I saw "the present research examined moral out rage as a mechanism".
Bob in Texas
at March 24, 2017 2:54 PM
Did Obama copy the UK with that letter of guidance to the colleges?
"Rape victims will be spared cross-examination in court and instead provide pre-recorded video evidence, under plans being brought forward by the Government."
That's right. The video is called "The Space Between", not "Taint", got it?
Gog_Magog_Carpet_Reclaimers
at March 24, 2017 6:13 PM
Bob, maybe the study is biased - but maybe not. There's no shortage of people who DO consider the CF lifestyle to be morally wrong, unless one is celibate. Take Rick Santorum (and many of the millions who voted for him in 2012). Or Baptist theologian Albert Mohler, who said: "Married couples who choose to be childless are revolting against God's design."
Gog_Magog_Carpet_Reclaimers
at March 25, 2017 12:01 PM
"Bob, maybe the study is biased - but maybe not."
Pick a phrase. Do "research" on something using only that phrase. Come to a "conclusion" using that phrase. Publish your "study" about that phrase.
OMG! Did you see that study where _____________ resulted in "phrase".
Ya think?
Bob in Texas
at March 25, 2017 1:10 PM
Explain, Gog? I don't get the joke.
Unless you mean that even Baptists are too liberal, these days, for pro-natalists.
Btw, I once got a chance to ask diehard lefty Katha Pollitt, in person, whether she thought there was any kind of growing backlash against CF people, whether or not they resort to sterilization. While she was very polite, she didn't give a clear-cut answer. My guess is that she didn't really believe there WAS a significant backlash, but didn't want to say so, for some reason.
And Bob, for the record, all I did to find that study was search in Google News on the word "childfree." After all, there IS a significant difference between people who pay thousands to overcome infertility problems vs. those who pay thousands to MAKE themselves infertile, so you can't just refer to "childless" people these days and expect the test subjects - or readers - to know which category you're referring to.
Is the Democrat Party in Nebraska trying to induce voter fraud? sure looks that way to me.
https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2017/03/exclusive-nebraska-democrats-include-voter-registration-forms-in-refugee-welcome-baskets
I R A Darth Aggie at March 24, 2017 6:20 AM
I humbly apologize for my efforts in this noble endeavor.
Why Guys Get Turned on When You Orgasm — and Why That's a Bad Thing - Of course guys manage to make YOUR orgasm about themselves.
http://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/a9169991/why-guys-love-female-orgasms/
Bob in Texas at March 24, 2017 6:23 AM
If you don't have any actual problems then you need to make them up. It's okay 'cause you're the good guys.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/446041/college-diversity-council-admits-posting-fake-racist-flyers-campus
Bob in Texas at March 24, 2017 6:34 AM
Best of luck with your Castle doctrine defense, bunkie. That's not how it works.
https://pjmedia.com/homeland-security/2017/03/23/ohio-accused-killer-nasser-hamad-invokes-islamophobia-defense-in-double-homicide/
I R A Darth Aggie at March 24, 2017 10:53 AM
Ever wonder what happens to virtue-signaling feminist men?
This is what happens.
Gog_Magog_Carpet_Reclaimers at March 24, 2017 11:55 AM
Of course guys manage to make YOUR orgasm about themselves.
________________________________________
Haven't read it yet, but doesn't that, in a way, make things worse for men?
From sexologist Eleanor Hamilton:
"Myth: A man has to 'make' a girl come. It's the man's responsibility to 'bring' the woman. The truth is that unless a woman can 'bring' herself, she has a poor chance of 'coming' with any man. Orgasm is something that each partner is responsible for and something they share together, as they would a wonderful dance requiring skill from both. No one would expect a dancer, for example, to create a fine ballet with a partner who had never practiced walking, let alone dancing. A man can be a willing and patient teacher, and he can learn how a woman likes to be made love to, but he cannot 'make' her 'come.' She has to do that for herself."
lenona at March 24, 2017 11:56 AM
From Purdue University:
"IUPUI study finds participants feel moral outrage toward those who decide to not have children."
http://archive.news.iupui.edu/releases/2017/02/child-free-adults-face-moral-outrage.shtml
..."What's remarkable about our findings is the moral outrage participants reported feeling toward a stranger who decided to not have children," Ashburn-Nardo said. "Our data suggests that not having children is seen not only as atypical, or surprising, but also as morally wrong."
lenona at March 24, 2017 12:03 PM
Here's the study itself:
"Parenthood as a Moral Imperative? Moral Outrage and the Stigmatization of Voluntarily Childfree Women and Men"
http://www.readcube.com/articles/10.1007/s11199-016-0606-1?shared_access_token=o5-yjTCSXk2gmjGnHJtq-_e4RwlQNchNByi7wbcMAY6f7ucxWO4RvrMbWtzmxG22tYu1HcZulOE27rEa8ZrIws19coFsI0U8KTc4JHiFZ85O0Zvk2L8M9qN3nBZH-Azs_BLXZRS_b1kDadIYYk6PEy2UJRq8VN9IHTjs23JInPE%3D
What's interesting, as someone pointed out, is that contrary to what Ashburn-Nardo expected, childfree men elicited just as much outrage as childfree women.
lenona at March 24, 2017 12:08 PM
"childfree men elicited just as much outrage"
Only from the 'smug marrieds'.
Gog_Magog_Carpet_Reclaimers at March 24, 2017 12:39 PM
Yonder.
Crid at March 24, 2017 1:57 PM
See also and also.
Crid at March 24, 2017 2:01 PM
"Consistent with many personal anecdotes, participants rated voluntarily child-free men and women as significantly less fulfilled than men and women with children," Ashburn-Nardo said.
"This effect was driven by feelings of moral outrage -- anger, disapproval and disgust -- toward the voluntarily child-free people."
Right. I'm asked to GUESS as to who may be LESS FULFILLED and my GUESS is due to MORAL OUTRAGE.
Oh yeah. I get that a lot.
Bob in Texas at March 24, 2017 2:05 PM
I'm reasonably sure that most psychologists would, in fact, call feelings like anger, disapproval and disgust "moral outrage."
Granted, maybe the people at Bratfree are closer to accurate when they call it "jealousy." Or, "misery loves company."
Of course, happy parents are generally not the judgmental ones in the first place.
Btw, Crid, I don't get that line: "Let's not act like everything is normal."
lenona at March 24, 2017 2:31 PM
As opposed to unhappy parents, I should have clarified. Not that there's any shortage of judgmental CF folk, but at least they generally WAIT for someone to ask for their opinions!
lenona at March 24, 2017 2:34 PM
Only from the 'smug marrieds'.
___________________________________
Meaning?
I just want to be sure I understand.
lenona at March 24, 2017 2:41 PM
I'm calling BS lenona (not on you lass but the authors). If the participants expressed "anger, disapproval and disgust" why not just say so. (Crickets?) Why name these expressions something else?
It's because the authors studied "Based on the logic of backlash theory and research on retributive justice, the present research examined moral outrage as [A] mechanism through which voluntarily child free targets are perceived less favorably than are targets with children for violating the prescribed social role of parent-hood."
Lies are nice and easy when you control the words instead of simply letting others use their own words.
"Our data suggests that not having children is seen not only as atypical, or surprising, but also as morally wrong." '
The authors purposely used "morally wrong" not the participants (unless that was their only word choice for "less fulfilled". Stopped reading after I saw "the present research examined moral out rage as a mechanism".
Bob in Texas at March 24, 2017 2:54 PM
Did Obama copy the UK with that letter of guidance to the colleges?
"Rape victims will be spared cross-examination in court and instead provide pre-recorded video evidence, under plans being brought forward by the Government."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/03/19/rape-victims-will-allowed-give-pre-recorded-video-evidence/
Bob in Texas at March 24, 2017 2:58 PM
See what happens when you merge two Finnish art icons:
NSFW Yo.
https://mobile.twitter.com/MarcusPetaja/status/845357240198610945
Sixclaws at March 24, 2017 3:06 PM
CBS News insists that you learn these new gender identity terms.
Don't be cis-gusting, just adopt the media's Newspeak Dictionary and do as you're told.
CBS News: The Space Between
That's right. The video is called "The Space Between", not "Taint", got it?
Gog_Magog_Carpet_Reclaimers at March 24, 2017 6:13 PM
Bob, maybe the study is biased - but maybe not. There's no shortage of people who DO consider the CF lifestyle to be morally wrong, unless one is celibate. Take Rick Santorum (and many of the millions who voted for him in 2012). Or Baptist theologian Albert Mohler, who said: "Married couples who choose to be childless are revolting against God's design."
More of Mohler's opinions here:
http://www.beliefnet.com/faiths/2005/06/deliberate-childlessness-moral-rebellion-with-a-new-face.aspx
lenona at March 25, 2017 6:52 AM
"Baptist theologian"
Why would anyone listen to that liberal nonsense?
Gog_Magog_Carpet_Reclaimers at March 25, 2017 12:01 PM
"Bob, maybe the study is biased - but maybe not."
Pick a phrase. Do "research" on something using only that phrase. Come to a "conclusion" using that phrase. Publish your "study" about that phrase.
OMG! Did you see that study where _____________ resulted in "phrase".
Ya think?
Bob in Texas at March 25, 2017 1:10 PM
Explain, Gog? I don't get the joke.
Unless you mean that even Baptists are too liberal, these days, for pro-natalists.
Btw, I once got a chance to ask diehard lefty Katha Pollitt, in person, whether she thought there was any kind of growing backlash against CF people, whether or not they resort to sterilization. While she was very polite, she didn't give a clear-cut answer. My guess is that she didn't really believe there WAS a significant backlash, but didn't want to say so, for some reason.
And Bob, for the record, all I did to find that study was search in Google News on the word "childfree." After all, there IS a significant difference between people who pay thousands to overcome infertility problems vs. those who pay thousands to MAKE themselves infertile, so you can't just refer to "childless" people these days and expect the test subjects - or readers - to know which category you're referring to.
lenona at March 26, 2017 1:07 PM
Leave a comment