Muslim Girl Sentenced To Death By U.S. Court
Islam demands Muslims kill apostates -- but that's just so barbaric that many westerners refuse to believe it. Unfortunately, that could mean the death of a 17-year-old Muslim girl, Fathima Rifqa Bary, who left Islam for Christianity, and is now being sent back to her family against her will. Jamie Glazov interviews Dave Gaubatz, an FBI agent who gets it:
Gaubatz: I have visited over 200 Islamic Centers throughout America. The vast majority teach the worshippers 'Apostates should be killed' because it is a major sign of disrespect to Allah, the family of the Apostate is dishonored, and it may lead others to leave Islam.
FP: Tell us about some evidence you have of Islamic leaders in America advocating killing Muslims who leave Islam?
Gaubatz: I have never written or verbally stated anything pertaining to Islam that I do not have first-hand evidence to substantiate. This is why I always challenge any Islamic leader to come forward and not simply 'spout' off that Dave Gaubatz is wrong, but instead to indicate the issue I discussed in a sworn affidavit and say what I have said is inaccurate and they would be willing to again swear under oath in a U.S. court of law my statements are incorrect.
Specifically in regards to Apostasy, I request any Islamic scholar or Imam in America to provide a sworn statement under risk of perjury that Rifqa Bary has not committed a major sin and is subject to the death penalty. The scholar should also include in the sworn statement that Rifqa should not have any concerns about other relatives or friends of her father who will seek justice for the father because his daughter dishonored Allah and him. Lastly, I ask any Islamic leader to include in a sworn statement (again under oath and with the penalty of perjury) that they are not aware of any materials used in any U.S. mosques that call for the death of any Muslims who leave Islam.
Jamie, there will be no Islamic leader who will take me up on this offer. Why? Because they would be lying. Not that lying and deception is not conducted on a regular basis by CAIR and ISNA executives, but they will hesitate to do so under the risk of perjury and imprisonment. I will be preparing a sworn affidavit with several references I have obtained from numerous mosques across America (to include Ohio) that clearly state Rifqa and any Muslim who leaves Islam is subject to death.
He asks some great questions at the bottom. Here are two of them:
[1] Why are our elected officials not prosecuting Islamic leaders who advocate death in America for children who decide to change their religion? If a Christian minister were to distribute material calling for the death of an innocent child like Rifqa Bary for leaving Christianity, would not our authorities and liberal media be calling for the arrest and prosecution of the minister?
[2] When will non Muslims in America begin to understand Islamic Sharia law is violent and is a serious threat to innocent people and to our country? Note: Sharia law also covers 'physical Jihad' against our country.







For whatever it might matter, I don't think Gaubatz is FBI. He describes himself as a civilian Federal Agent -- I don't know what that means.
Here is one biography:
Mr. Gaubatz’s career began in 1977 when he joined the United States Air Force. Before retiring from the USAF in 1999, he served his last 12 years as Special Agent with the United States Air Force Office of Special Investigations, AFOSI; his duties there included investigations of felony crimes against the USAF and U.S. government, as well as counterterrorism and counterintelligence investigative assignments. After spending one year with Target Corporation as National Investigator, in 2000 Mr. Gaubatz returned to AFOSI as U.S. Federal Agent. In 2002 he attended an intensive Arabic-language course at the U.S. State Department, Foreign Service Institute, which included a three-week immersion trip to Jordan. Arriving in the Middle East in January 2003, he was soon assigned to Nasiriyah, Iraq.
jerry at September 18, 2009 12:40 AM
I read somewhere that her father was looking to sell his business right after he learned about his daughter's interactions with the Minister in Florida. Interesting.
Feebie at September 18, 2009 1:00 AM
Saw one report, dont know if its true or not, that claimed the mother admited on the stand the girl ran away AFTER she{mother} told the girl that her actions were forcing the familly to leave the USA
lujlp at September 18, 2009 2:33 AM
Holy crap. If the girl wanted to get an abortion against her parents' wishes, there would be judges arm-wrestling over the privilege of granting her legal standing. I don't wish to start an abortion argument, but no matter which side of that issue you're on, you've got to agree that the comparison is f'ed up (sorry Amy, I'm at work!).
Cousin Dave at September 18, 2009 8:14 AM
Since the girl is 17, she will be legally emancipated from her parents in a small number of months. This makes me wonder why the court decided to send her back. If she says "My parents are going to kill me," and believes it, why rush her back?
Pseudonym at September 18, 2009 9:04 AM
Pseudonym, that's a great point. It would seem a lot more judicious for the court to just keep continuing the case until the girl turns 18, at which point it becomes moot. Or, it could just grant her legal emancipation now. I don't know about Florida, but here, if a person of 16 or 17 approaches the court and can reasonably demonstrate that they are mature enough to take care of themselves, a grant of emancipation is, from what I've heard, automatic.
Cousin Dave at September 18, 2009 9:19 AM
Leave a comment