Sunday's Love Note
I got this reader e-mail on Sunday (along with a bunch of really nice ones). I've reproduced it as written, boldface and all:
Dear Amy,So far your negative and insulting advice to those seeking help is truly intolerable and so far has ruined my peaceful Sunday morning reading.
I have written 5 books so far in regards to "Emotional Intelligence."
In my 1997 (copyrighted) title: Timotheus, The First Dictionary of Emotions," I define the term:"Insensitive Jerk: 1) any male or female, professional or layperson who disregards, disrespects or overrides the needs, wants and desires of another human being and then insults them (demonizes) in the process: (TYPICAL) Advice Columnist or Psychologist who responds to one seeking help or advice as not only blatantly ignorant but uses one or many negative emotional invectives to injure, insult or belittle the person who is seeking such professional help. 2) a clinical professional term used to describe patients who exhibit no morals, no ethics, no manners, no socially accepted skills or the acceptance of behavior other than their own presets of intolerable attitudes. 3) (insensitive) decrees a having or showing a lack of concern for the feelings of others: tactless: cruel in intentions or acts. 4) a person who insults another person in any emotional negative term. 5) a person regarded as disagreeable, contemptible or as the result of foolish or mean behavior: to utter sharply (mean) and abruptly (curt): to twist or thrust with a sudden movement: curt or gruff in behavior or speech: jumping form topic to topic without proper transitions: jerky and disconnected: one who lacks wisdom and disciplines. 6) a person calling another person "an insensitive jerk" is one himself/herself. 7) a person who not only disagrees with your opinion but demonizes you for having an opinion that is not exactly like their opinion. 8) one lacking any emotional intelligence or is emotionally illiterate: any person who claims to have a certain wisdom but can show no proof of such higher knowledge: an intolerant attitude: prejudiced. 9) a person who believes that "RULES" do not apply to himself/herself: a person who believes that no other person (on the planet) could possibly know more than they do: a person who has to justify their aberrant behaviors by putting another person down in order to elevate themselves due to their own low self-esteem or baser values." (end)
I have been dealing with this issue for 32 years and have written about it for 24 years.
My Advice to you is: read the books: "Emotional Intelligence" By Daniel Goleman, "Emotional Alchemy" By: Tara Goleman,
"If the Buddha Dated", By: Charlotte Kasl, Ph D. or more importantly, "Webster's College Edition Dictionary", before you give out anymore cruel and misleading advice to those that really need helpful information, not "sledgehammer" rhetoric.
This kind of "advice" is the cause of suicide and homicide before suicide, (which I have either witnessed or have prevented far too many from words like the ones you impinge upon your readers minds.
Remember the Healers Code? "First, do no harm."
In my opinion and many other noted authors, all you are doing is more irreparable harm.
"Think" of the "Ripple in the Pond" effect. You're either the "problem" or are part of the cure.Best Regards,
Tim Gega
Gotta love the signature!
My response (after skimming his e-mail, not reading it -- life is too short):
Ironically, it seems you feel exercising your superiority is a way to invoke change. Stanton Peele tells me "Motivational Interviewing" is a much better technique. My column is a humor column. I write back to people at great length when I'm leading up to writing a column, and give them answers, references to turn to, etc. I also have spent years studying for what I do -- Albert Elliswas a mentor, and my column is based on research in anthropology and related fields, plus I use reason and apply ethical standards -- referring to ancient scholars, Adam Smith's "Theory of Moral Sentiments," and more modern works. Robert H. Frank's "Passions Within Reasons
" and "What Price the Moral High Ground?
" are a few of the numerous influences on me. People tell me they're helped by the fact that I'm one of the few people who will give it to them straight. You make a lot of assumptions about me below, yet really know little to nothing about me or how I live or behave. Interesting. You also seem to have a lot of rage at me. Well, hope you feel better. -Amy







Sometimes its best to just say "Bah!" and wave the little peon off to some feel good vegan barbecue or whatever the damnfool does with his time. As it is though, a fine answer.
The fact is that when people write to you, they KNOW what they're getting in return. If they want a feelgood gentle roundabout answer, they can write to dear abby, ann landers, or some other columnist, or pay for therapy if they think they need continuous help. If they write to Miss Alkon, they're going to get an answer that is as subtle as a club to the face, a damn sight more understandable, and for someone ready to heed it, a LOT more helpful.
A look at the writer's record would probably reveal he spent a good deal of time giving sympathy to unhappy people, but providing no real answers on how to address the roots of the problems that made them unhappy in the first place.
Robert at September 14, 2009 1:58 AM
I'm glady you said skimmed because after a few lines, I could not read it and only was able to skim. And the sign off really made me laugh. Obviously his experience is writing in his journal in a mental institution because he is not only ridiculously hostile, but his rant goes on and on without making much sense.
I agree with Robert. People know what they get when they write you. And as I've said in the past, I did write you many years ago when I was feeling a little lost and I needed a good kick in the ass. You gave it to me as expected, but there was a kindness and compassion in what you said, not just someone looking to get a quick laugh at my expense.
I wish you would stop saying you are just a humor column because you are so much more than that. At the heart of most of what you say are very big truths that people don't always want to hear and usually they want it wrapped neatly with a pretty little bow. Send those people to Dear Abby who really doesn't dispense anything worthwhile unless you really want to know if you have to eat Aunt Lorna's fruitcake that she sent for Christmas.
Kristen at September 14, 2009 5:11 AM
The letter reminded me, for the first time in 10+ years, of the letters we used to get in Zurich in the year and a half we were there, from the police for unpaid parking tickets. There was very little parking around the university, DH and loads of others parked on the street immediately around it, and they all always got tickets, and they always took their time paying them. Anyway, the letter was full of saber-rattling about how you must pay NOW or there will be a penalty, you are now late and it is unacceptable.......and then it always ended 'mit freundlichen grussen'(grusse??? haven't spoken German in a while...) It always cracked us up.
crella at September 14, 2009 5:29 AM
Being nicey nice doesn't get people to change their behavior. That's why I like Dr. laura so much. She gets on people about THEIR actions and THEIR behavior. She doesn't hold there hand and say, you poor misfortunate misunderstood person, I don't understand how they could mistreat you.
You have to get on people to change their behavior whether it's kids or adults.
Have you ever seen a softy soft supervisor plead with an employee to get to work on time? Maybe the employee humors them for a day or two before reverting back to their former behavior. All the while saying what an idiot the boss is.
Or you get someone that says I'm docking your pay an hour if your late and your fired the third time you come in late case closed. What changes behavior better.
Amy I like your style. Your style will possibly get someone to change, rather than the namby pamby hand holding style taught by our dysfunctional, ineffective and politically correct schools we have today.
David M. at September 14, 2009 6:43 AM
Thanks - I think so, too.
People's friends can "there-there" them. If that worked, they wouldn't be coming to me.
In fact, people frequently write me saying they know they need to be slapped. Also, I think it's okay to say this -- I've been communicating with Tyler Cowen, who wrote an amazing book I'm just finishing now, Create Your Own Economy: The Path to Prosperity in a Disordered World, and he told me he thinks, from an economist's point of view, that I'm the best advice columnist out there. That pretty much rocked my red world!
Amy Alkon
at September 14, 2009 6:54 AM
Amy Alkon
https://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2009/09/sundays-love-no.html#comment-1667579">comment from Amy AlkonAnd this is an assumption on my part, but when I get letters this vitriolic, all about them and what they think and sans substance of what apparently so disturbed them in the column, I suspect it's because they think "How come she has a column and I don't?!"
As for this guy, after I wrote to him, I wondered about all those books he said he wrote and I couldn't find a single book under his name on Amazon or on Google.
Amy Alkon
at September 14, 2009 6:59 AM
...and I couldn't find a single book under his name on Amazon or on Google.
I said to myself as I started to read his e-mail, "this fool hasn't written diddly-squat, because if he had, he wouldn't have written such a childish diatribe in an effort to shame Amy!" Heheheh, whata ma-roooon! o.O
Flynne at September 14, 2009 7:17 AM
I have written 5 books so far in regards to "Emotional Intelligence.
There's a significant difference between written and published.
It always irks me when people assert claims of authority on the basis of their background in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy has no valid empirical basis. There's no reason to privilege these claims over those of an astrologer, or a plumber for that matter.
What's scary is that most people who practice psychotherapy don't seem to be intelligent enough to recognize the significance of this fact.
Mike at September 14, 2009 8:09 AM
He is on Classmates.com! And his appearance on your blog is the sole published credit I can find.
My wife is studying this very issue right now in her Theory Of Nursing class. You will probably be dismayed to learn that this "feelings" hogwash has penetrated some very unlikely places, like a graduate degree nurse practicioner program.
JohnO at September 14, 2009 9:52 AM
The only problem with denouncing crackpots is...the appearance that the pot is calling the kettle black.
i-holier-than-thou at September 14, 2009 10:21 AM
Keep giving 'em hell, Amy!! To echo the sentiments of others here, people that write to you for advice surely know what they are in for and are not looking to be coddled. (If they are, then they need to have their eyes opened for sure!) You are a straight shooter, consistent and fair, not to mention witty and entertaining as hell. You obviously have realized your calling, much to your fans' enjoyment...you do people a service, actually, by cutting through the soft, feel-good BS and telling it like it is. Rock on!
Beth at September 14, 2009 11:58 AM
One wonders what Dr. Phil would make of Tim Gega. I doubt it would be flattering, but would make for great TV!!!
Robert W. (Vancouver) at September 14, 2009 12:19 PM
"You're either the 'problem' or are part of the cure."
Nice and thuggishly totalitarian-sounding, don't you think?
old rpm daddy at September 14, 2009 12:50 PM
Hmm. Notice also that this person has not appeared in any news reports about lives saved, etc.
Dude (?) - get a life. Or use your regular handle, i-holier-than-something.
And Have A Nice Day!
Radwaste at September 14, 2009 2:45 PM
Wow, now I know had bad people feel after reading what I write after going on, and on, and on...
Amy, you're quite popular for the very reason he criticizes you; "sledgehammer rhetoric."
This world needs far less of the "babying" that's shamelessly and endlessly pandered to the offenders of the senses, and more of the hard truth with perhaps even better, "jackhammer rhetoric?"
He mentions suicide and homicide with the inference (I presume) that your words may or have caused one or both.
That's interesting, because in his rant (er definition) he states in part
Really? With that said, I'm left wondering how he defines "hypocrite." Does he do so using "mirror" or "me?"
Tony Fantetti at September 14, 2009 4:26 PM
For a supposed expert he sure doesn't practice what he preaches...
crella at September 14, 2009 5:06 PM
Not sure how I missed that earlier Kristen, but an incredibly important and equally good point.
You may utilize humor to make your points Amy, but IMHO, that doesn't make this a "humor column."
I'll agree to it being humorous at times, however your points are usually very serious.
Writing a column using humor to drive a serious point home is far different that writing a humorous column.
Often times I do find myself laughing not at what you've said, but at how you said it. This, because in many cases what's being said is no laughing matter.
Tony Fantetti at September 14, 2009 6:08 PM
Amy Alkon
https://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2009/09/sundays-love-no.html#comment-1667679">comment from Tony FantettiThanks so much, guys. I know it's more than that -- but I felt the guy couldn't see it, so I left it at that. He hasn't written back, and I know he's gotten my e-mail (he's on AOL, and I can check to see if e-mails I've sent to other AOLers have been read).
Amy Alkon
at September 14, 2009 6:12 PM
Actually, Amy, the fact that you exercise your tongue from behind a computer screen while using such invective makes you come across more as a coward than anything else.
It would be interesting to see how you talk in real life. I suspect your bravado is non-existent, or collapses at the first sign of someone who isn't going to stand for it.
TheExpatriate700 at September 20, 2009 12:34 PM
Amy Alkon
https://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2009/09/sundays-love-no.html#comment-1668640">comment from TheExpatriate700Um, "invective"? Do you realize the letter is from a reader? I purposely answered him without malice, and didn't point out that it seems his books do not exist.
How I talk in life? Read my blog, dear. My book is called, I SEE RUDE PEOPLE: One woman's battle to beat some manners into impolite society for a reason. It's all about how I stand up to people. FYI, I'm what's called "a costly punisher." That means I'm somebody who takes action that I feel is the right or just thing when there's potentially great cost to me and no benefit or little benefit.
Amy Alkon
at September 20, 2009 1:09 PM
Leave a comment