A Kinder, Cuddlier President
Matt Welch writes in reason of how it was supposed to be in the Obama years, and how it's actually turning out:
Obama's approach was supposed to produce a more cooperative Tehran and Moscow, fewer terrorists in the Muslim world, and vast new initiatives to fight global poverty. Instead, Iran has murdered dissenters while speeding up its nuclear program, Russia hasn't discernibly budged even after the U.S. abandoned its missile shield in the Czech Republic and Poland, a Muslim suicide bomber was stopped at the last minute from blowing up a plane over Detroit on Christmas, and global gatherings have produced even less concrete action than usual....The Copenhagen crackup was a dream killer in more ways than one. Not only did the breakdown give the lie to the notion that a cranky Texas oilman was the single greatest impediment to international cooperation and enlightened environmental policy; it laid waste to the argument that yoking the developing world to a "do as we say, not as we did" policy of energy consumption will somehow prove to be an economic and environmental "win-win."
...In the truer-believing regions of the progressive political world, the broad agenda of carbon price hikes, centralized health care, greater regulation, increased taxes, and government-mandated diversity in boardrooms are not just sound and moral policy. They are inherently popular, if only the usual obstacles to justice and reform can be neutralized or removed. Back when he was still considered a plausible stand-in for "the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party" (enough to win 2.7 percent of the presidential vote in 2000, much of it from progressives disgruntled at New Democrat policies), Ralph Nader insisted on a daily basis that his agenda was essentially "majoritarian."
Such fantasies can serve as a salve when you live on the margins of the policy debate. And as long as you remain on the sidelines, the underlying proposals tend to go largely unchallenged. But now that progressive economic thought has its first real foothold in Washington since the 1970s, many long-marginalized ideas are being dusted off for real-world testing, from taxing stock transactions to "getting people out of their cars." If we're lucky, those debates will take place before the ideas are cemented into law. Better yet, maybe the growing unpopularity of central planning will dissuade the enthusiasts from inflicting their experiments on the rest of us in the first place.
Whoops, it seems "not George Bush" is not enough to qualify one for the office of president. My hope? For as little change as possible. For about as much as Senator Obama effected during his time in the Senate.







I will never, ever forgive the fascist, and I mean ABSOLUTE AUTHORITARIAN dementia of the left as this man took the Executive Branch. And that includes some of the closest members of my family. It was disgusting, a view of some of the worst contents in the human soul...
The conceit, the narcissism and smugness, their insane belief that daydreams of forcing others to be 'good' through the exercise of unlimited power were becoming real. I'm pissed, and I'm going to remember it until the day I day, and remind them of their misconduct with cometlike regularity. Not EVERY holiday, but no year without a pointed reminder, either.
This wretch spent 12 trillion dollars in one year... On nuthin'.
Crid [CridComment at gmail] at February 9, 2010 12:48 AM
Not to worry. Sarah Palin and some divine intervention are on their way to save America.
GMan at February 9, 2010 5:47 AM
$1,000,000,000,000 is a lot of money. Think of it this way: If you spent one million dollars every day beginning in the year 1 A.D. ( Caesar Augustus was the emperor of Rome in that year ) and ending in the year 2010 A.D., you would still not have spent one trillion dollars.
Nick at February 9, 2010 8:17 AM
I think there was a lot of anybody-but-Bush sentiment in 2008. People voted for Obama thinking, "how could it be any worse?" Well, this is exactly how it could be worse.
Cousin Dave at February 9, 2010 9:00 AM
And yet I still have people try to tell me that not only is Obama an improvement over Bush, but "he's better than that damned Sarah Palin".
Obama is the worst president we have ever had in the history of the Union.
brian at February 9, 2010 12:51 PM
Miss me yet?
Pseudonym at February 9, 2010 1:12 PM
Pseudy - RE: Miss me yet?
The answer for me: Yes and no.
Bush was the right president to have when 9-11 hit, and I believe he did his best to protect us when it came to terrorism. I also believe he loved this country and loved being an American. I also think very highly of him as a person.
However, between amnesty, cow-towing to the Saudis, extending government involvement in education and his socialist fiscal policies (although no where near the current president) I feel the need to temper my nostalgia.
Feebie at February 9, 2010 2:09 PM
I didn't vote for Bush in 2004, but the Obama administration makes those look like the good old days. Despite Cheney's evil overlord vibe we knew there was at least one grown-up present. If only his frail human form could be replaced with an indestructible robot body.
Pseudonym at February 9, 2010 4:57 PM
Leave a comment