Do Not Pass Goat...
Do not collect $12,500 of our taxpayer dollars. In "Great Moments In Government Waste," Cato's Dan Mitchell wonders what the hell the government's doing giving a grant to some lady to market goat milk soaps and lotions? Mitchell writes:
I'm sure if you read the Constitution with enough imagination, you'll find (perhaps in invisible ink) the section stating that the federal government is supposed to provide subsidies to help specific companies market soap made out of goat milk.
I concur with him, that the government shouldn't get another penny of our money until they stop this sort of thing. (From our blogs and lips to deaf ears of sleazebag politicians.) Details on the $12,500 grant here, in New Mexico Business Weekly, which helpfully names the sleazebags stealing our taxpayer dollars (think of them as legalized bribes for voters in their district or state):
U.S. Senator Tom Udall, D-NM, and Terry Brunner, state director of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Development, held a celebration ceremony for Milk and Honey Soap LLC to highlight the USDA's Value Added Producer Grant program. The company received $12,500 to market its products.
I'm sick of these politicians proudly sucking off the tax teat for businesses in their district. They're stealing from the rest of us -- those of us who have to work very hard these days to earn a living, who don't get business welfare from Uncle Sam. I was against it for GM (they should have been allowed to go bankrupt) and I'm against it for the goat soap lady.







She should have to start her business like evryone else. Get a loan/investors whatever it takes. But a grant. Thta party just bought alifetime voter with that grant. Disgusting!
David M. at July 30, 2010 4:00 AM
Ummm ... GM did file for bankruptcy.
AllenS at July 30, 2010 5:59 AM
Damn, stuff like this is starting to make our friend BOTU actually sound sensible.
AllenS, that's true, but the bankruptcy process didn't get to play out the way the law says it's supposed to... the government short-circuited it. A bunch of GM's and particularly Chrysler's creditors and shareholders got stiffed by the federal government strong-arming its way into a priority position in the settlements.
Cousin Dave at July 30, 2010 6:18 AM
It could be argued that they are also creating a tax payer for life. If those shit faced cock masters from BOA got billions I have little problem with someone getting a grant to start a business. Think of it this way, you can either give them the 12,500 or you can give her bank the 12,500 when she fails and defaults on the loan. Also those same shit face cock masters won't lend, neither will the CC. Just about to cancel my last card since those assholes refused me a $200 cash advance for 2 days. Pulling money out of long term saving would have cost me a fortune. Still really pissed, though the fault is primarily mine and I admit it openly.
For all the tax payer dollars wasted on making banks happy this is about the only thing that might boost the economy. But no I agree this was not covered in the Constitution. Doubt the founding fathers would have even contemplated something like this. Otherwise they would have likely forbidden it outright.
vlad at July 30, 2010 6:32 AM
@Cousin Dave, actually, that is the end result of any bankruptcy ... your creditors and shareholders get stiffed.
Now I'm not advocating gov't bailouts for anybody, including the big 3 automakers. But it did rankle me that the banks got $700B with no stings attached while GM was given $17B along with a gov't takeover of the business.
allens at July 30, 2010 7:00 AM
"Think of it this way, you can either give them the 12,500 or you can give her bank the 12,500 when she fails and defaults on the loan."
Threat of another wrong doesn't make the first one right. I am going into business for myself and getting me a grant while the gettin's good. Maybe I can make little pillows out of the hair my car sheds?
momof4 at July 30, 2010 7:02 AM
"I am going into business for myself and getting me a grant while the gettin's good." You got pregnant 4 times and by law if your bread winner dies without leaving enough money we as tax payers get to cover you, with NO possible return on our investment. It would be for a hell of a lot more than $12K. On the other hand if you have found a car that sheds, get that grant I'd love to say I have a car hair hat.
BTW if you meant cat hair there is an identical bushiness that's is quite lucrative. They weave cat hair with silk to make garments.
vlad at July 30, 2010 8:06 AM
I know people who have gotten these grants locally and it takes a certain kind of hustler who is familiar with government bureaucracy. They really are not the poor schmuck trying to start a body shop or plumbing business. Often they're former govt employees who just happen to know the ropes and the grantwriting biz. It's not real and usually the outfits fold like a house of cards in a couple years.
Sadly, most cities and towns and schools get by on this largesse. Nothing is real anymore, no one knows how to get by on purely local revenue.
carol at July 30, 2010 10:46 AM
"You got pregnant 4 times and by law if your bread winner dies without leaving enough money we as tax payers get to cover you, with NO possible return on our investment. "
Nasty, Vlad, and were that the case I would be quite the lazy clod. DH is insured for $1 million, me for half that. Only stupid parents don't insure themselves properly, and I am not stupid.
Yes, I meant cat, and I actually heard of that business on tv yesterday as the girls watched animal plant. It struck me as highly absurd, but if they're making money, more power to them!
momof4 at July 30, 2010 1:18 PM
Amy Alkon
https://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2010/07/great-moments-i.html#comment-1738468">comment from momof4Only stupid parents don't insure themselves properly, and I am not stupid.
Right on, momof4!
My late friend Cathy Seipp had a big disability policy (among others) on herself via Lloyds of London, which I'm sure paid the bills for her and her daughter when she was fighting her lung cancer.
Amy Alkon
at July 30, 2010 1:27 PM
So, if you sell goat milk as is you'll get raided by the FBI, but if you mix it with chemicals (which would actually kill you to ingest) you get my money to sell it as face cream?
lujlp at July 30, 2010 3:21 PM
Amy Alkon
https://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2010/07/great-moments-i.html#comment-1738487">comment from lujlpNuts. Unfortunately, I don't get to make the laws, I just get to report on how idiotic they are.
Amy Alkon
at July 30, 2010 3:24 PM
So let me get this straight: the federal government wants to ban raw milk from goats...unless it's used for soaps and cosmetics. Then they'll subsidize it. Gotcha.
mpetrie98 at July 30, 2010 8:11 PM
@Vlad: why would you want to do business with Banco de las Americas anyway, those supporters of doing business with illegal aliens? Just ditch the [manure] face [rooster] masters now and don't look back!
Amy can tell you all the problems she had with Banco de las Americas.
mpetrie98 at July 30, 2010 8:14 PM
So let me get this straight: the federal government wants to ban raw milk from goats...unless it's used for soaps and cosmetics. Then they'll subsidize it. Gotcha.
Ohio was trying to penalize Amish farmers years ago for not storing milk (to be made into cheese -- i.e. adding bacteria to curd milk) below 57 degrees.
Nothing amazes me anymore.
Jim P. at July 30, 2010 8:33 PM
Leave a comment