Black Conservatives On Spit, Sherrod And The Tea Party
What do you see and hear?
Jack Cashill writes at American Thinker:
I checked with my source on the scene, Greg Farrell, to get a timeline on the passage of the Black Caucus members from the Cannon Building to the Capitol and back. According to Farrell, they left the Cannon Building about 2:30 PM on March 20th and returned about 3:15 PM. He had no reason to exaggerate.I asked because at 4:51 that same day, McClatchy reporter William Douglas posted an article on the McClatchy website with the inflammatory headline, "Tea party protesters scream 'nigger' at black congressman."
In other words, Douglas, with an attributed assist from James Rosen, managed to interview representatives John Lewis, Emanuel Cleaver, and Barney Frank, compose an 800-word article, and have it edited and formatted for posting within a 90-minute window.
During that same 90 minutes, Douglas would have received and incorporated a press release from Emanuel Cleaver, making the easily disproved claim that he had "been spat upon and that Capitol Police had arrested his assailant."
Only two possibilities present themselves, neither of them good: Douglas had started writing this enormously consequential article in advance and/or he assembled it with a reckless indifference to the facts. A simple call to the Capitol Police would have killed the spitting story and a review of the video footage would have thrown the screaming of "nigger" by multiple "protestors" into such serious doubt that no responsible paper would have printed it.







The media is so left leaning it is a miracle they haven't fallen over on their side.
Then congress is so blind and deaf to their constituents desires that they have no clue of how much they are f'ing up.
If they could have held the ObamaCare vote until after Easter -- it probably would have failed.
It boils down to this:
We are so fucked.
Jim P. at August 8, 2010 9:46 AM
I didn't hear a single instance of "nigger!" All I could hear was "kill the bill!"
Pirate Jo at August 8, 2010 10:02 AM
Amy Alkon
https://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2010/08/black-conservat.html#comment-1740828">comment from Pirate JoI care about the truth -- cared about it during the Bush administration, with hundreds of posts critical of them -- but the same people on the left who, like me, were demanding truth back then seem very content with silencing it, or at least aggressively not investigating it now. This tells me what they were seeking wasn't the truth, but the win, and I really despise that.
Matt Welch and Nick Gillespie of reason are now writing a book that's basically "you're a libertarian but don't know it," and I'm really glad. People need to be reminded that they don't just have to pick from the D or the R lane.
Amy Alkon
at August 8, 2010 10:08 AM
People need to be reminded that they don't just have to pick from the D or the R lane.
They do if they want their votes to count for anything. Libertarians generally don't win.
kishke at August 8, 2010 12:06 PM
Based on what we know now, the article was almost certainly written before the fact. The CBC's approach to the Capital through the middle of the Tea Party crowd was a deliberate provocation; they had pre-coordinated media coverage with the expectation that certainly there would be racial abuse and perhaps even an assault. When those things failed to happen, they were left in a bind. The answer was to bare-face it: damn the facts, publish the pre-written narrative anyway and depend on friendly treatment from the JournoListers (at least some of who may have known in advance what the plan was) to ensure that their version of the story would not be questioned.
Cousin Dave at August 8, 2010 2:49 PM
Three words kishke:
Self Fulfilling Prophesy
Robert at August 8, 2010 4:12 PM
In the Tea Party Express video, I love the moments when the persons at the microphone merrily and contemptuously sneer at the media persons who are arguing with them. The left and the media deserve to be sneered at, laughed at, ridiculed without mercy.
I read where Mickey Kaus said of Cathy Seipp (quoting from memory): "She was just so grouchy. She just wouldn't take any shit from anybody." Those of us who believe in small gov need to take a lesson from Cathy Seipp. We ought not be polite with persons who are strategically skewing facts. Such persons are not seeking truth, and we ought not treat them as serious persons. We ought not be polite with persons who are strategically abandoning reason. Again: not seeking truth, and we ought not treat them as serious persons.
If a person is not seeking truth, reasoned argument is not going to win that person over to the truth. Scorn is actually more likely to open that person's eyes. Scornful humor is maybe the best option of all.
gcotharn at August 8, 2010 4:36 PM
The news should report what happens instead of making stuff up or skewing it out of all belief. The Tea Party has been very non-violent, and they should be applauded for demonstrating the way it should be done.
The other news organizatoins are going to lose out to Fox News more and more as people wise up unless the other newscasters start reporting fairly. Fox might have a right bias, but they constantly give air time to people with left and right points of view.
Kris at August 8, 2010 5:45 PM
Amy Alkon
https://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2010/08/black-conservat.html#comment-1740886">comment from KrisShow me evidence of somebody saying the "n" word or looking like they're spitting on somebody with intent, and I'll believe the accusations. Until then, I have to agree with the people who say the claims are baseless.
Amy Alkon
at August 8, 2010 5:48 PM
The Tea Party movement is a loose collection of citizens who don't like public policy. The MSM devotes great energy to uncovering any racism that may be hiding there, and discovers little or none.
On the other hand, the Congressional Black Caucus is a proud, openly racist organization, which is part of our government at the higest level. Is it possible to have greater irony?
The CBC is not merely organized to consider the supposedly special interests of their "black" constituents. They won't admit a "white" congressman to membership, regardless of who he or she represents.
The Congressional Black Caucus is an official group of congressmen and senators. They require black skin to be a member.
===== Quote =====
Wikipedia [edited]: The Black Caucus allows only black members.
Representative Pete Stark (D-Ca, White) tried and failed to join the Black Caucus in 1975. Stark: "I felt we shared an interest to help people in poverty. Half my Democratic constituents are African American. The Black Caucus voted no. They said that I was white, and they wanted the group to be limited to African Americans."
===== /Quote =====
Politico: Whites Not Allowed
--> www.politico.com/news/stories/0107/2389.html
===== Quote =====
[edited] In January 2007, Representative Steve Cohen (D-TN, White) pledged to apply for membership in the Black Caucus to better represent his 60% black constituents.
Although the bylaws of the Caucus do not make race a prerequisite for membership, former and current members of the Caucus agreed that the group should remain "exclusively black."
Rep. William Lacy Clay, Jr. (D-Mo., Black) is the son of Rep. William Lacy Clay Sr. (D-Mo., Black) a co-founder of the Caucus. "Mr. Cohen asked for admission, and he got his answer. He's white and the Caucus is black. It's time to move on. We have racial policies to pursue and we are pursuing them, as Mr. Cohen has learned. It's an unwritten rule. It's understood."
===== /Quote =====
- -
Above, I have put "black" and "white" in quotes in some cases, because my view is that race is not important, and people cannot be reliably identified by race. For example, is Obama "black" or "white"? What are all of the measurements and weightings that would go into that calculation?
I have listed the party affiliations of congressmen in the form (D-Mo., Black/White) as a mockery of our current politics of race affiliation.
Andrew_M_Garland at August 8, 2010 6:46 PM
Please read the following article so you might inform yourself.
http://www.redroom.com/blog/tim-wise/black-powers-gonna-get-you-sucka-right-wing-paranoia-and-rhetoric-modern-racism
Britt Barba at August 9, 2010 12:58 AM
Please read the following article so you might inform yourself.
Who, and of what? Are you not able to think of and articulate a comment on the blog item above, so you just toss in a link? Perhaps work on reasoning and articulation and then post.
Amy Alkon at August 9, 2010 1:15 AM
It doesn't matter as much as it once did. The media have been caught lying so often that my default position is to expect proof of anything controversial.
Even then, I am skeptical. The last Texas Air National Guard memo has yet to be written.
MarkD at August 9, 2010 5:52 AM
Hear about this one:
Media Matters Gives Glenn Beck’s Co-Hosts The Shirley Sherrod Edited Audio Treatment (Update)
Jim P. at August 9, 2010 7:12 PM
There's still a part of this story that nobody will touch: John Lewis and his entourage LIED. It's been long enough that we know that no corroboration of their story is going to show up, and there's plenty of audio footage floating around.
Mike L. at August 11, 2010 5:04 PM
Leave a comment