I think the cat actually belonged to Schrödinger not Heisenberg, but how do you prove it at this late date?

And could the cat pass a Turing test?

If you ask me, Schrodinger left out the most obvious answer. There's only one reasonable state for a cat locked in a box, which is bloody furious.

Which, by being predictable, elegantly proves his point that the Copenhagen interpretation was nonsense at macro levels. I'm not sure why he didn't go with that one.

Just for fun - here's how we do criminal trials in Australia.

http://www.justinian.com.au/storage/pdf/Daubney_R_Baker.pdf

"Order me a fuckin' pizza while you're at it"

If you have problem's bringing up Ltw's link try this:

http://www.news-mail.com.au/story/2012/06/14/accused-goes-foul-mouthed-rampage/

Joke.

Non-Joke: "The fact that more people are living long enough to be diagnosed with cancer says something about how far we've come."

Oh, Boom!