Why Do So Many Travel Guides Make Excuses For Dictators?
Michael Moynihan writes at ForeignPolicy.com:
In 1933, as Joseph Stalin was busy purging his enemies and building a murderous cult of personality, the New York-based left-wing magazine the Nation advised readers interested in traveling to Moscow that Intourist, the Soviet Union's official travel agency, employed as tour guides "very interesting and attractive young women without hats," skilled in correcting misinformation spread by the capitalist media. Although the hatless apparatchiks from Intourist limited sightseeing to approved destinations -- Ukraine, at the apogee of its brutal famine, was off-limits -- they were nevertheless adept at obtaining "special permits" from the predecessor of the KGB, which, the Nation noted, "far from being a band of terrorist police, is an extremely able and intelligent organization, always glad to help tourists."...These days, the young and progressive book travel online, eschewing tour groups and specialized travel agents. This leaves the task of a travelers' political education to guidebook empires like Lonely Planet and Rough Guides, both of which -- while offering what Lonely Planet calls "honest and objective" advice on where to find the perfect pisco sour in Peru or that slice of beach paradise in Cambodia -- provide detailed, polemical asides on the political history and culture of the countries under review.
...For instance, readers of Lonely Planet: Libya -- published before the recent unpleasantness -- are told that Libya's murderous dictator, Muammar al-Qaddafi, was likely framed for the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103. In fact, the book relates, "One of the most credible theories was that the bombing had been ordered by Iran in retaliation for the shooting down of an Iran Air airbus by a US warship in the Persian Gulf on 3 July 1988." Qaddafi is cast as a misunderstood figure ("A recurring theme throughout Colonel Qaddafi's rule has been his desire for unity with other states, all to no avail"), unfairly maligned by Western governments ("ordinary Libyans suffered [under sanctions] and the world rebuffed repeated Libyan offers to hand over the Lockerbie suspects for trial"), and the victim of media unfairness ("Western reporters, keen for any opportunity to trivialise the eccentricities of Libya under Qaddafi, referred to [his bodyguards] as the 'Amazon Women'").
Oh, he was just a big fluffy bunny!
via @walterolson







Lonely Planet are entitled to their opinions, odious as they may be. We likewise have freedom to travel. What frosts my buns is idiots like our intrpid hikers who want to see the (Iranian, North Korean, whatever) borders and get themselves locked up for (espionage, trespass, flashing their tatas, whatever.)
You have the right to do stupid things, and you have the right to suffer the consequences.
MaarkD at August 15, 2012 5:23 AM
The travellers are going to be carrying those books around. For their own safety, their guidebooks better not say anything that could get them jailed in those countries.
NicoleK at August 15, 2012 6:06 AM
You might be in the wrong country if you can be jailed because of what's contained in your travel guide.
I R A Darth Aggie at August 15, 2012 7:34 AM
People take risks, be it for pleasure, business or country.
NicoleK at August 15, 2012 4:51 PM
I wonder what the tour guides said about Hanoi in 1972?
And I won't even bother reading Peru's current political description. I ate only one meal today and don't want to taste my gorge.
Jim P. at August 15, 2012 7:23 PM
Leave a comment