Right, Left, And Agenda Driven
Paul Craig Roberts writes at Lew Rockwell about what the right and left have in common -- being all about their agenda at the expense of seeking the truth or balanced solutions. An excerpt:
There are reports (about Sandy Hook) that when emergency medical help arrived at the school, the medical personnel were denied access to the children on the grounds that there were no survivors and the scene was too gruesome. Yet, there is a conflicting story that one six-year-old girl had the presence of mind to play dead and walked out of her classroom unscathed. If the story is true, how do we know that other survivors did not bleed to death from wounds because the emergency medical personnel were denied access? Did police exercise more control over the scene than was warranted?It doesn't seem to matter that questions are not answered and discrepancies are not resolved. The story is useful to the gun control agenda. Progressives, in order to achieve their agenda, are willing adjuncts of the police state. The facts of the shooting are less important than the use of the incident to achieve their agenda.
Probably there are answers to the questions. Moreover, the news reports that are the basis for questions could be incorrect. But why aren't the answers provided and confusions cleared up? Instead, people who ask obvious questions are dismissed as "insensitive to the tragedy" or as "conspiracy kooks." This in itself deepens suspicion.
The Colorado movie theater shooting has its own unresolved discrepancies. One eyewitness claimed that there were two shooters. Apparently, the suspect was captured sitting in a car in the theater parking lot, which seems strange. There are claims that the accused, a graduate student in neuroscience, was involved with the Defense Advance Research Projects Agency in mind control research and that he doesn't remember doing the shooting.
Do we actually know? Apparently not. Wouldn't it be preferable to investigate these claims rather than to leave them as unanswered sources of suspicion? The loose ends of the Colorado movie shooting contribute to the suspicions caused by news reports of the Sandy Hook shootings.
A shooting incident occurs. The government puts out a story. Agendas form and take the place of the story. Unresolved issues disappear in heated dispute over agendas. Gun control advocates blame guns, and Second Amendment defenders blame other factors.
When the media permit agenda to take precedence over news, people lose confidence in the media and distrust spreads deeper into society. If the media and the government are opposed to conspiracy theories, they should not foster the theories by mishandling the news.
Neither the right-wing nor the left-wing has an interest in getting to the bottom of things. The right-wing is aligned with the police state in order to make us safe from "terrorism" - Muslim terrorism, not the terrorism of the unaccountable police state.
...American liberals have such an abiding faith in government that they are incapable of believing that beloved government would be culpable in crimes - unless, of course, it was Ronald Reagan's government.
As tyranny envelops the land, the main goal of the left-wing is to disarm the population.
The American left is the enabler of the police state, and the American right is its progenitor.








Believing everything in that writeup and totally disbelieving that Sandy Hook happened means that every major media outlet has lied about the shooting completely.
But to follow that thinking, as well believing that 9/11 was allowed/caused/advocated by the government would have us all having to believe that the federal government is orchestrating everything.
That thought leads to madness, in every meaning of the word.
Jim P. at January 1, 2013 2:38 AM
"Fast and Furious." Benghazi.
Fool me once shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me.
Bill O Rights at January 1, 2013 6:32 AM
Well Jim, in defense of this write up telling us not to trust the media, as I recall the unfolding story. . .
The shooters name was reported as the brothers, he went to the school to kill his mom and then went on a rampage, the shooter was let in by school personel because they knew him, the shooter purchased his AK47 at a local gun shop that very day, the brave police stormed the school and killed the shooter...
So yeah, excuse us for not trusting the media
lujlp at January 1, 2013 12:16 PM
Mind Control? Oh please....
KateC at January 1, 2013 12:41 PM
"Mind Control" is not necessary. Instead, call it "changing public attitude".
If you walked into a Safeway in Prescott, you might be terrified. Why? If you are from somewhere the public is not trusted, the number of ordinary citizens carrying pistols openly in public would shock you.
Why?
Were you brainwashed? Not all at once. The continuous input supplied by your surroundings convinced you that your neighbors are totally unable to control themselves.
You have been told repeatedly that you are unable to be responsible, and you believe it. If you see anyone holding a gun who does not have a uniform, you will be frightened, and irrationally.
There are no stories in the news about good men standing up to criminals. The State has reserved arms, and the violence possible, for itself. You are told, "don't take the law into your own hands", in another absurdity designed to render you helpless: you are the only person at the scene, when you are attacked, who is on your side of that law.
The goals of any organization are only similar to your own, at best - they are never the same.
Radwaste at January 1, 2013 5:13 PM
Luj, I still recall the ridiculous stories about mass murder and rape in the Superdome during Katrina. To this day, the reporters who reported those things stand by their stories, despite their being provably false. How, then, can they face themselves in the mirror in the morning?
Answer: because they are narcissists. They have granted themselves the privilege of defining what reality is. They want it to be true; therefore, is is. And because they are inherently better human beings than we are, we have no right to even ask questions.
It is entirely possible that we will never know what really happened at Sandy Hook, other than the most basic facts: there was a shooter and a bunch of people got shot. All else will be invented by the media to fit their preferred narrative. Any contrary information will be suppressed.
Cousin Dave at January 1, 2013 6:21 PM
Leave a comment