Hollywood Loves Its Government Handouts (In Between Weeping For The Fate Of The Poor)
Glenn Reynolds writes in the WSJ of Hollywood's sweetheart deal from government:
At the Democratic National Convention last year, actress Eva Longoria called for higher taxes on America's rich. Her take: "The Eva Longoria who worked at Wendy's flipping burgers--she needed a tax break. But the Eva Longoria who works on movie sets does not."Actually, nowadays an Eva Longoria who flipped burgers would probably qualify for the Earned Income Tax Credit and get a check from the government rather than pay taxes. It's the movie set where she works these days that may well be getting the tax break.
With campaign season over, you're not likely to hear stars bringing up taxes at this weekend's Academy Awards show. But the tax man ought to come out and take a bow anyway. Of the nine "Best Picture" nominees in 2012, for example, five were filmed on location in states where the production company received financial incentives, including "The Help" (in Mississippi) and "Moneyball" (in California). Virginia gave $3.5 million to this year's Oscar-nominated "Lincoln."
Such state incentives are widespread, and often substantial, but they don't do much to attract jobs. About $1.5 billion in tax credits and exemptions, grants, waived fees and other financial inducements went to the film industry in 2010, according to data analyzed by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Politicians like to offer this largess because they get photo-ops with celebrities, but the economic payoff is minuscule. George Mason University's Adam Thierer has called this "a growing cronyism fiasco" and noted that the number of states involved skyrocketed to 45 in 2009 from five in 2002.
...The $1.5 billion in subsidies that states provide, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, "would have paid for the salaries of 23,500 middle school teachers, 26,600 firefighters, and 22,800 police patrol officers." Or it could have gone to cut taxes on small businesses, which, as Ms. Longoria noted in her DNC speech, produce two out of three jobs in the economy.
In her words: "It's the suburban dad who realizes his neighborhood needs a dry cleaner. It's the Latina nurse whose block needs a health clinic--and she knows she's the one to open it! It's the high school sophomore who is building Facebook's FB -0.56% competitor. They are the entrepreneurs driving the American economy."
And they are the people who aren't receiving the kind of special tax treatment that states dole out to Hollywood.








See also.
Crid [CridComment at gmail] at February 23, 2013 2:33 AM
And so is exposed the principal problem with a representative democracy: the public, even celebrity, has no idea of the issue they address. They stop after shouting about the one thing they can see, and they're in charge...
Radwaste at February 23, 2013 7:00 AM
I always love when total hypocrites Demand a plan partially NSFW).
Jim P. at February 23, 2013 9:24 AM
In my state, it's the Professional Sports that our tax dollars support. A drug-addled football team owner, a basketball team full of thugs and their owner who has many malls, and race cars, race cars, race cars. Our Symphony can't (and shouldn't) get tax dollars and has had to pare down. Even the Super Bowl was a net loss to the taxpayers. I would like to see a no sports investment pledge - if we can't afford cursive writing, art & music at school, we can't afford big sports arenas that sit vacant 28 days a month.
IF a sports team can not be profitable on it's own terms, let them leave! They don't hire many locals (not for the big bucks) and the taxpayers fund their venues and then can't even take some of the profit on food and beverage to maintain the building. I am so over it! And btw, this state is a Republican stronghold and they are no better than the Dems. They take from the poor to give to the rich here. Corporate welfare just makes me sick.
bmused at February 23, 2013 12:31 PM
Jim, that's a telling piece. Astonishingly juvenile, effectless, a pleading for someone else, ANYBODY else to be Daddy and make the boogeyman go away.
And it will never occur to them that they will call men with guns to save them from the thug or stalker.
Radwaste at February 23, 2013 4:14 PM
Rad,
Agreed. Almost as hypocritical as Bloomberg.
Jim P. at February 23, 2013 6:14 PM
@ bemused - talk to your neighbors about *exactly* what you are saying here. The change you would see happen only has a chance in the next generation . . . or perhaps it will be even longer than that.
But please, don't stop.
railmeat at February 24, 2013 2:00 PM
It's easy for the elites to demand tax increases because the elites themselves don't pay taxes.
Cousin Dave at February 25, 2013 8:09 AM
Leave a comment