Why You Must Protect Your Children From The Harm Of TSA Gropings
If I had a child, I would not fly or I would go to jail to protect my child from being groped. I am stunned at people standing by as their children are groped by TSA thugs in the name of security -- a meaningless puppet show by unskilled workers that pretends that we catch terrorists by performing "bad touch" on a sobbing 6-year-old.
An important blog item about this was posted on TSA News Blog in April, but it's important to have a second look at it. Richard Walbaum writes:
A parent or guardian of a child does not have the right to allow anyone to touch a child's private parts, unless it's for the child's benefit such as during a medical exam. This is because such touching is recognized as harmful. All states have passed laws against it. Children themselves are not even allowed to give consent for such acts. If I don't have the right to commit an illegal act (harm my child), I don't have the right to allow someone else to do it; I cannot give consent, direct or implied.You should protect your children from the TSA because it causes them harm. Men and women complain that they feel violated; could a child feel any less? And will it leave permanent scars? If the TSA doesn't let you and your child fly, your only recourse is to file a complaint and sue (it's a civic duty) for violation of your child's rights to safety and travel.
We must continue to put pressure on the theory that the TSA can do anything it wants to us, even harm us in order to "protect" us. Otherwise, proctology exams and Taser bracelets are in our future.
When our country was founded, the choice between freedom and protection was made in favor of freedom and secured by the Fourth Amendment. But the courts made a "special needs" exception for airline security.
...We need to make it clear to the courts that groping of children or adults is not acceptable, which is why we (that means you) need to hammer the courts with lawsuits until they change the practice.
Filing a lawsuit is, of course, expensive. If you can't afford the time and cost, at least you can file a complaint with the District Attorney in the airport's county. For those who do have the resources to go all the way, you now have a legal theory.
I think it's important to protect our children at airports, and while we're at it, to redefine the level of intrusion we're willing to accept. I provide more information on how to deal with the TSA, as well as how to disobey unjust laws, at my website.
Walbaum's book: The LAWFUL Remedy to Tyranny: How You Lost Your Rights, and How You Can Get Them Back.








This is one of many reasons why I won't fly until the TSA is disbanded. My parents are moving to Florida soon, and they're taking the auto train. I told them to be sure they don't let anyone search their belongings for ANY reason. My brother is going with them because I can't get off from work that week. But if I were able to go, you can bet your last dollar that I'd be sure to see to it that NO ONE searches them for ANY reason. This country is going to hell in a hand basket.
Flynne at February 26, 2013 8:51 AM
"If I had a child, I would not fly or I would go to jail to protect my child from being groped."
so what would you do if you were one of the 99.99% of parents who fly through screening just fine? I was treated like royalty traveling with child on my last few trips. Seriously, they treated us well. They directed him around the backscatter machine. I asked if I could go through the metal detector too. "Of course, we would never separate a child from his parent." We have a separate straight-to-the-front line at OAK. Children his age no longer have to take off their shoes. I can't tell you how special that made my son feel, being one of the only ones with his shoes on. Also I did not know pilots still give cabin tours to kids. I'm sure it falls short of what Delta did for kids in the 70's but they let him sit in the pilot's chair and operate the throttles, pretty cool.
My point is an inverse of Radley's observation that libertarianism Happens To People. If the majority of people are treated well, or at least OK, then it won't happen.
So what's the good little TSA activist to do in the face of friendly and reasonable customer service agents? Agitate anyway, use the kid as a pawn?
It's the same feeling I get when I show up at elementary school after reading a bunch of Free Range Kids. I called to make sure ninja swords were banned (part of the Halloween costume.) To my surprise they were allowed. Plastic swords at a public school, how reasonable.
smurfy at February 26, 2013 10:50 AM
So you got them to irradiate your kid instead of groping him with nothing but their oh-so-reliable word that they're done storing naked pictures and can totally assure you that they've caught all of the pedophiles they've employed in the past. All so they can show a record of having caught zero terrorists in over a decade of operation. But at least the idiots in blue made your kid feel special by allowing him to keep his shoes on. Hoo-fuckin-ray. The experience by 99.9% of the families who go through security is not acceptable just because it is easy.
Elle at February 26, 2013 12:56 PM
so what would you do if you were one of the 99.99% of parents who fly through screening just fine?
I wonder how often house slaves asked field slaves a similar question.
So because Uncle Creepy didnt finger fuck your baby, it perfectly fine that he did it to some one else's child?
lujlp at February 26, 2013 3:06 PM
"...so what would you do if you were one of the 99.99% of parents who fly through screening just fine? I was treated like royalty traveling with child on my last few trips. Seriously, they treated us well."
Okay. Here you are: "Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves, and, under a just God, cannot long retain it." --Abraham Lincoln, letter to H.L. Pierce, April 6, 1859
Congratulations on your success, training your son that he is better than those other people.
When, not if, you find you cannot live without official permission of some kind, you need only look in a mirror to find out how it happened.
The irony here is that most people only see themselves when they do that...
Radwaste at February 27, 2013 6:42 AM
Amy Alkon
https://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2013/02/why-you-must-pr.html#comment-3626145">comment from RadwasteRight on, Raddy.
Amy Alkon
at February 27, 2013 6:44 AM
Go ahead and beat on an ally but I'm going to re-state the point anyway because, well because that's what people do when they miss/ get misunderstood on the internet.
The reason this issue isn't gaining more traction in the general population (bring this up around a water cooler full of coworkers who don't read the agitator) is because most people get treated well most of the time. Until they realize they aren't special and get their rights trammeled in some way they will not ever have much sympathy for your cause.
Next point: puppycide is wrong. So I get pulled over for speeding, cop is respectful, should I use this as an opportunity to rail against the system? That's a little bit Che shirt.
smurfy at February 27, 2013 9:50 AM
And no, not right on Raddy, you've completely missed the target.
You really think going through the family line is "deny[ing] freedom to others?" Well good luck convincing parents to be to forego circumcision by calling it genital mutilation.
People like me are not your problem, nobody who's been here for years needs convincing. It's your coworker in the next cube. How are you going to get through to him, by driving to Disneyland? Throwing a fit for no reason in the screening line?
"But the courts made a "special needs" exception for airline security."
Yup and I don't like it anymore than I like the DUI exception to the constitution. It doesn't take much in the way of balls to stand up and be anti-anti-terrorism at this point. It's bullshit to anyone who's paying attention and crying little girls in wheelchairs are sympathetic victims. Do you have what it takes to stick up for unsympathetic victims like drunk drivers? Once we declared that particular ends worthy of stopping at any means, TSA is what you get.
smurfy at February 27, 2013 10:09 AM
"So you got them to irradiate your kid instead of groping him with nothing but their oh-so-reliable word that they're done storing naked pictures "
No no, we went through the metal detector, like in the good old days, rather than the nudie scanners. No groping involved. Frankly I showed up looking for a fight and was a little disappointed when I was treated so damn reasonably.
smurfy at February 27, 2013 11:21 AM
No, smurfy. Look at more than your face in the mirror.
When someone knows of injustice and allows it to pass unremarked - and of course, the injustice is happening to someone else - it's called, "collusion".
Doesn't the name, "Niemoller" ring a bell?
Radwaste at February 27, 2013 7:45 PM
Leave a comment