Political Correctness Signed Into Law In Washington State
Via Martin, Claudine Zap writes at Yahoo that the language is being twisted to take out all the "men" from all the statutes:
In Washington state, the word "freshman" is out. And "first-year student" is in. In total, 40,000 words have been changed as part of an effort to rid state statutes of gender-biased language.The bill, signed into law earlier in the year by Democratic Gov. Jay Inslee, went into effect this week.
And it was no small task. "This was a much larger effort than I had envisioned. Mankind means man and woman," Democratic state Sen. Jeanne Kohl-Welles of Seattle told Reuters.
"Fisherman" is now a "fisher." "Penmanship" is called "handwriting." And "manhole cover" is, well, still "manhole cover." Some words don't have an easy replacement.
Others do: "His" is now "his and hers." "Clergyman" is now "clergy." "Journeyman plumber" is now "journey-level plumber," according to the Daily Mail.
According to Reuters, Washington is the fourth state to officially remove gender-biased language from the law. Others are Florida, North Carolina and Illinois. Nine other states are considering similar gender-neutral laws.
"Words matter," Liz Watson, a National Women's Law Center senior adviser, told Reuters. "This is important in changing hearts and minds."
The minds you're changing suspected you were a nitwit previously. Now they have confirmation.
From Reuters:
Nearly 3,500 Washington state code sections, out of a total of about 40,000 have been tediously scrubbed of gender bias, although most involve adding pronouns "she" and "her" to augment the existing "he" and "his," Thiessen said.
Washington State flush with cash and can't manage to use enough for kindling?








If it was so important to them ok but why not just pass a quick bill saying "from now on in previou statutes fisherman will be assumed to imply fisher, fireman willbe assumed to mean fireperson" etc and use the new terminology in fiture bills? Going back seems tedious
Nicolek at July 10, 2013 10:50 PM
Tedious especially considering there are probably rules on the books about horse drawn carriages.
Though my "favorite" prt is the irony of gender specific words being removed at the support of the National WOMEN's Law Center. So when is the law center going to change their gender biased language, because "Words matter," Liz Watson....
Joe J at July 11, 2013 12:46 AM
What kinda moron assumes all fishermen are men these days?
How hard would have been to simply amments the first article of the states staute to read all law apply equally to both sexes?
Better question, how come all laws didnt apply equally to both sexes?
Finally what words were used to replace huMAN and woMAN?
lujlp at July 11, 2013 1:14 AM
"Have you seen the new edition of the Newspeak dictionary? It's this thick. And the next edition will be that thick. It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words."
Oldthinkers unbellyfeel Ingsoc.
Smile for the cameras. Line up for your Federal healthcare. Line up to be searched by "Homeland Security". George was just ahead of his time.
Radwaste at July 11, 2013 2:35 AM
Are they changing husband and wife to spouse? What about "Violence against woman" laws?
Goo at July 11, 2013 4:28 AM
What fuckin' idiocy.
Flynne at July 11, 2013 5:05 AM
Amy Alkon
https://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2013/07/political-corre-3.html#comment-3796640">comment from GooAre they changing husband and wife to spouse? What about "Violence against woman" laws?
Those are federal, I think, but great point. And domestic violence is not just against women, but against men, and in larger numbers and more equal numbers than people believe.
Amy Alkon
at July 11, 2013 5:16 AM
Amy Alkon
https://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2013/07/political-corre-3.html#comment-3796644">comment from lujlpFinally what words were used to replace huMAN and woMAN?
Right, luj!
(Don't give them any ideas!)
Amy Alkon
at July 11, 2013 5:17 AM
I'm sure that Washington state is swimming in money to do this too.
Jim P. at July 11, 2013 6:21 AM
Are they changing husband and wife to spouse?
No, it is changed to Parent1 and Parent2. Seriously.
Stinky the Clown at July 11, 2013 8:45 AM
I guess the regularization of "womyn" and "wymmyn" is next.
ValiantBlue at July 11, 2013 8:58 AM
I was going to decry this as legislative histrionics, but then I realized that was gender-biased way of describing it (HIS-trionics).
How do they expect to manage ... um, administer ... such a such a widespread change in the language?
This will go down in history ... oops, um, the past in the future ... oh forget it, I'm off to Hispaniola ... damn it.
Conan the Grammarian at July 11, 2013 9:11 AM
And this should make a huge difference for all the women at Microsoft, right? Because if Gates decided to move the company to Bora-Bora, WA would go broke.
KateC at July 11, 2013 9:20 AM
What magical powers does Ms Watson possess that enable her to make an entire state government leap to do her bidding? It would be nice if my government did what I want them to, but to them I'm just citizen #22848616 and I have to take a number & wait. Yet when Liz Watson of the National Women's Law Center decrees that all statutes must be translated from English to Newspeak, duly elected representatives all the way up to the Governor bow and obey.
Why does she get her way and I don't?
Martin at July 11, 2013 9:53 AM
At my fine institution of higher learning, in the early 80's, women was "womyn." It's as ludicrous now as it was then.
And I still cannot bring myself to use "they" or "them" for third-person singular, but I will substitute "one" and mix it up between "he" and "she."
Other mix-ups between "he" and "she" are out of scope for this discussion.
Jeff at July 11, 2013 11:06 AM
Easy luj you just do a search and replace every instance of man with human. So human becomes huhuman and woman becimes wohuman and... Wait that didnt work theres still a man in there... Ok we need to do the search and replace again...
Nicolek at July 11, 2013 11:26 AM
Now old white men everywhere are trembling in newfound awareness that these bold risk-taking rascals are not above thumbing their noses at stale convention!
I'm sure these social adventurers are grateful for their allies, the semi-proletariat and the reactionary classes of the petite bourgeoisie, and will spare them the noose when the revolution comes.
Their next pronouncement: All must learn to play the piano!
Gog_Magog_Carpet_Reclaimers at July 11, 2013 1:05 PM
"Woman" --> "Woperson" --> "Wopermasculinechild"
Who could possibly object to this thought-cleansing?
Jay R at July 11, 2013 3:01 PM
The comments on this blog are HYSterical.
But on a sad note, my wife needs a HYSterectomy.
Nick at July 11, 2013 4:36 PM
Lately I've come to think that those who got their lunch money taken from them - and who can't do anything other than desk work - are getting back at the rest of us by working in these positions, emasculating America as a whole.
The American empire is done. They gave it away, just like the Romans and the British. Cue China.
Radwaste at July 11, 2013 6:20 PM
Manhole cover = sewer lid.
This would be an improvement.
Michelle at July 11, 2013 7:21 PM
If you are so insecure that you need to pass such a bill, I guess you need it. I don't really care what the wording is, that's just semantic bullshit.
Assholio at July 11, 2013 9:26 PM
"The bill, signed into law earlier in the year by Democratic Gov. Jay Inslee" who is himself ... a freshman.
smurfy at July 12, 2013 2:01 PM
Keep in mind, the same people who spent time on this nonsense are the very same people who came within three days of a state government shutdown because they couldn't find a way to pass the budget in the six-month timeframe they were given.
Yay, Washington state!
jimg at July 12, 2013 5:29 PM
Leave a comment