The Unions That Supported Obama Crying Foul On "Affordable" Care Act
At Forbes, Avik Roy writes:
Labor unions are among the key institutions responsible for the passage of Obamacare. They spent tons of money electing Democrats to Congress in 2006 and 2008, and fought hard to push the health law through the legislature in 2009 and 2010. But now, unions are waking up to the fact that Obamacare is heavily disruptive to the health benefits of their members.Last Thursday, representatives of three of the nation's largest unions fired off a letter to Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, warning that Obamacare would "shatter not only our hard-earned health benefits, but destroy the foundation of the 40 hour work week that is the backbone of the American middle class."
The letter was penned by James P. Hoffa, general president of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters; Joseph Hansen, international president of the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union; and Donald "D." Taylor, president of UNITE-HERE, a union representing hotel, airport, food service, gaming, and textile workers.
"When you and the President sought our support for the Affordable Care Act," they begin, "you pledged that if we liked the health plans we have now, we could keep them. Sadly, that promise is under threat...We have been strong supporters of the notion that all Americans should have access to quality, affordable health care. We have also been strong supporters of you. In campaign after campaign we have put boots on the ground, gone door-to-door to get out the vote, run phone banks and raised money to secure this vision. Now this vision has come back to haunt us."'Unintended consequences' causing 'nightmare scenarios'
The union leaders are concerned that Obamacare's employer mandate incentivizes smaller companies to shift their workers to part-time status, because employers are not required to provide health coverage to part-time workers. "We have a problem," they write, and "you need to fix it."
"The unintended consequences of the ACA are severe," they continue. "Perverse incentives are causing nightmare scenarios. First, the law creates an incentive for employers to keep employees' work hours below 30 hours a week. Numerous employers have begun to cut workers' hours to avoid this obligation, and many of them are doing so openly. The impact is two-fold: fewer hours means less pay while also losing our current health benefits."








We are governed by fools.
DrMaturin at July 17, 2013 1:31 PM
The unions supported Obamacare because they thought someone else would be paying the bills.
Reality struck as employers cut hours and employees to cut costs and reduce liabilities under Obamacare.
Turns out there isn't a magic money tree.
Oops.
Conan the Grammarian at July 17, 2013 1:44 PM
Unions and politicians who cater to them act like businesses are just hoarding loads of money and won't share. Their prefered solution, as always, is more government intervention.
Of course businesses are going to do what is in their best interest, just like how politicians and unions do. Even if the business has the money, they're not going to hire a courier if it's going to cost them $100K a year. That's like passing a law that when people order pizza they have to.tip $25.... they just won't order pizza even if they can afford it.
It may sound good to tell voters that they'll make their boss do all sorts of good things for them. It just lands them unemployed since the benefits are no longer worth the cost of employing them.
Trust at July 17, 2013 2:30 PM
I guess now that the bill has been passed, everyone is finding out what's in it.
Lobster at July 17, 2013 4:29 PM
Everyone has his own moment on The Road to Damascus. Even Hoffa and the Teamsters.
roadgeek at July 17, 2013 6:19 PM
In a OT but related union commentary:
The Bakery, Confectionary, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union (BCTGM) released a statement for the new producers of Twinkies. Part of it:
This is coming from the same idiots that refused to take a pay cut, on the advice of the union bosses, that killed their jobs in the first place?
Jim P. at July 17, 2013 6:35 PM
Jim P you ever dream of a day when people stop pussy footing around thru press releases and just say on national television "go fuck yourselves you stupid morons"?
lujlp at July 17, 2013 6:44 PM
I do. And this comes close to that.
The unions were needed back when. But since then you now have OSHA, NLRB, every state's Bureau of Worker's Comp, SSDI and the rest of it that is so far overreaching what the unions can do.
And another side note on Twinkies, They are now smaller than they used to be. The calorie count went from 150 per to 135.
Jim P. at July 17, 2013 7:31 PM
Yep, all my part time workers have now been screwed over by Obamacare. I can't afford $72,000 to offer insurance to 14 part time employees, so down to 30 hours they went. 30 hours is not full time. Total bullshit.
Daghain at July 17, 2013 8:30 PM
Hey, don't forget grocery stores. One Publix nearby had just 23 fulltime workers - and ~200 part-timers.
The stupidest thing you can do in the USA is hire a worker. I can't believe my Credit Union opened more branches. It cuts their ability to undercut banks.
Radwaste at July 17, 2013 8:47 PM
"... The impact is two-fold: fewer hours means less pay while also losing our current health benefits."
Plus those workers will have to buy more expensive individual insurance or pay a fine.
ut not to worry, I have no doubt Congress will fix it - by increasing minimum-wage by $3 per hour.
John A at July 18, 2013 4:33 AM
And I have no doubt business will fix that by automating and outsourcing even more.
MarkD at July 18, 2013 5:36 AM
I am always amused when unions chide business for looking out for their own interests, as if unions aren't looking out for their own interests.
Trust at July 18, 2013 6:17 AM
Who'd of thought that a massive government intrusion, developed behind closed doors, by people with no medical training or expeience, adding thousands of regulations, and requiring thousands of new government employees would ever adversely affect health care costs and availability?
I'm shocked, I tell you shocked!
Jay at July 18, 2013 6:25 AM
"Turns out there isn't a magic money tree."
But the belief that there is such a thing is the central tenant around which their lives are organized. It permeates their every thought, from the moment they wake up in the morning to the moment they go to bed at night. So if you try to make the libertarian argument to them, it will go one ear and out the other -- you may as well be speaking Sanskrit. It just sounds like noise to them. Their proposed solution to the problem will be to amend Obamacare to add in special privileges for members of their tribe.
Cousin Dave at July 18, 2013 7:28 AM
I loved posting this to my friends facebook wall. He was an AVID supporter of ObamaCare even though he admitted that he had no idea what it actually meant. He's a hardcore Liberal, too. He and I had some pretty heated debates about it that almost cost us our friendship.
All I said was "I told you so."
To my surprise, he actually said "I can't believe I'm saying this but you were right."
I'll admit it.... I'm feeling pretty smug right now.
Sabrina at July 18, 2013 7:52 AM
Comrades,
We must reform the reform!
Stinky the Clown at July 18, 2013 11:03 AM
Not a big fan of union behavior, especially their coziness with the mob, but when they see executives making millions, flying around in a private jet, getting bonused while workers lose their livelihoods, yeah, it seems like there's a money tree.
Who's allowed to shake it is what the fight is about.
Gog_Magog_Carpet_Reclaimers at July 19, 2013 10:37 AM
Meg Whitman helped drive the stock price of Hewlett-Packard up 25% in her first year on the job.
Marissa Mayer helped drive Yahoo's stock price up 70% in her first year on the job.
Ron Johnson was fired as CEO of JC Penney when his marketing strategy failed and sales tanked ... and the stock price nose-dived.
Bob, the new unionized employee in the Assembly Department, does not have the same effect on the company's valuation as the new arrival in the C-Suite.
Wall Street does not value the stock according to Bob's resume or how Bob plans to concentrate his energies for the coming year; nor does it panic when Bob decides to phone it in.
High-level executives have a greater influence on how the investment world sees a company and how a company performs. Unions are attempting to collectivize the workforce into a single entity with as much impact as those executives and get it paid accordingly.
However, that collectivized entity rarely develops and implements strategies to increase market penetration or drive down costs. It merely demands that if the company has any money, the union should get it.
Kinda like a teenager demanding that, because he mowed the lawn, Mom and Dad should spend Dad's bonus on buying Junior a new car instead of fixing the leaky roof.
Conan the Grammarian at July 19, 2013 2:31 PM
I think stock price increases are wonderful for stockholders.
The BEST thing about being a stockholder, though, is being an EXECUTIVE stockholder, because you're holding preferred stock, not common stock.
Then, when you tank the company and take your $24 million golden parachute and the company goes bankrupt, you ALSO get compensated early as a special class of creditor!
Common stockholders and employees can just suck it. What did they ever do but provide funds and products and services to make the company profitable in the first place?
Losers, the lot of 'em.
Gog_Magog_Carpet_Reclaimers at July 20, 2013 7:38 AM
Stock price increases also help the corporation. Higher stock values provide financial leverage and provide ways for the company to raise capital without borrowing - as well as providing collateral for borrowing money.
Higher stock prices also benefit ESOP plans and pension funds invested in that stock.
Stock analysts value companies based on what management is doing, how sound the company's strategy is, and the expected demand for its products (existing and new). This provides the non-experts and non-insiders with a holistic view of the company. Private companies don't have to publicly reveal as much and can often be an mystery to investors (private companies still sell bonds) and employees.
If there's nothing left, the preferred stock holders also get nothing. In the event of bankruptcy, preferred stock holders must still wait in line behind creditors and bond holders for payment (unless they're unions holding stock in Chrysler and Obama decides they get to be at the front of the payout line).
There are some other limitations to different classes of preferred stock, including, depending upon the class of preferred stock, redemption value limitations, voting, and limitations to dividend payouts.
Conan the Grammarian at July 20, 2013 10:08 AM
Leave a comment