I say send the guy on a speaking tour, and give him press time, so as many people as possible can hear what he thinks, how he came to his positions, and who he believes agrees with him. His views aren't the biggest problem here... the most dangerous aspect is that too few Americans know an outlook like his exists, or that it is held and promulgated by people who are well-compensated and outwardly respectable. Buried in all this is a statement, waiting to be made, about the federal bureaucracy and the kind of people it has gone out of its way to employ.

Also, as we unpack the meaning of Ayo Kimathi's positions and his use of a website to put them into the public eye, it may help to keep in mind that we recently endured the spectacle of the President of the United States using his own office, plus the levers of power in his Justice Department, to pour racial gasoline onto a local police matter while dragging it into the national spotlight.

There's a connection between the two, a common source. Something is happening here. And though what it is ain't exactly clear, that's not a reason to fail to perceive that Kimathi may be giving us a window into something very real.

As an example, let's look at something that was much more telling than it seemed at the time. After a 2008 Obama campaign speech, a rejoicing Peggy Joseph was recorded on video as saying "I won't have to worry about putting gas in my car. I won't have to worry about paying my mortgage. You know, if I help him, he's gonna help me." Conservatives and others jeered, but she has proven to be a much better seer than her detractors.

So let's hear as much as possible about what Kimathi has to tell us, and ponder his message, the place he works, and how he came to be there. If he thinks something is "eminent", or imminent, maybe we should listen.

I don't see anything inconsistent here. Who is Reverend Wright, again?

Oh, just the minister of the church our President attended for years.

He makes a reference to his readers' "Christian hearts." His comment about "white devils" makes him sound more like a follower of Nation of Islam.

The other possibility is that he is exactly the kind of person they want.

He's certainly misguided: "We love the very race that murders our babies, destroys our culture, and commits countless acts of genocide against our people worldwide"???

I'm guessing he doesn't live near and/or hasn't read about the countless acts of black-on-black genocide in Chicago. Not to mention Detroit, Bridgeport, Philadelphia, Hartford, New Haven, and other cities where most crimes committed are black on white and black on black.

He's blaming white people for the things people of his own race do on a much larger scale. Wonderful. Where's the NSA now?

It passed spell check, so what's the problem with eminent? The president can give mellifluous speeches utterly devoid of meaning, so why can't some SLA wannabe who missed the 70s do the same? Who needs facts when they have feelings?

The 70s, in case he wasn't around, didn't work out too well for his cause. At the end of the day, when the looting and rioting was done, the neighborhood that was destroyed was not Beverly Hills. Barbara Streisand was not living in a tent. There's always a lesson to be learned, but you've got to pay attention.

Well the article mistates some of the facts. Unless he is earning money from the outside activities, he doesn't need permission from DHS.

I think this admin made more efforts for "racial animosity" than previous ones.

Stupid, racist and vicious - sounds like a great choice for the TSA.

And yes, I know he's DHS, I'm just suggesting we move him to the TSA Subdivision of Idiots in light of his status as America's Smartest Government Employee.

Now, had he been a memeber of the KKK or some other white hate group then I would expect to see this on the evening news over and over for weeks on end.

But . . . crickets.

And where is Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson?

Just a question, but wouldn't "black ethnic cleansing" suggest that blacks are the subject of this purge, not the beneficiaries?

Disclaimer: Not suggesting anyone or anything should be purged.

Anecdotes are fun, but I want facts and figures. In any profession you'll find some crazies. What I want to know is what percentage of TSA workers are crazies and criminals, and how statistically different is it from other professions.

I suppose he could be happy that police are looking for two black teens suspected of beating an 88 year old white man to death.

No word from the President on whether they could have been him/his son.

"What I want to know is what percentage of TSA workers are crazies and criminals, and how statistically different is it from other professions."

Especially those with immediate and personal impact on the rights of American citizens, right?

So, Janet Napolitano was right. We do have to worry about domestic terrorists.

And he's been put on paid administrative leave pending the investigation.