'We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases."
(I don't care what you say, I'd feed it and give in a pillow to sleep on.)
One thing I really miss about the ol' CompuServe account was that the jump suits were really convenient when you were in the mood for sexual encounter. Worked great. Unless she was menstruating, because then you couldn't let her anywhere near your pristine bachelor pad.
Crid [CridComment at Gmail]
at December 16, 2013 12:10 AM
Personally, I think Montmartre's a shithole. Still.
Try this on: A union is saying right to work is slavery. But they aren't getting that forcing employees to join the union to work is taking away civil liberties too.
Regarding the last line, let me be the one to just go ahead and say that Edward Snowden is a hero. M'kay? Let's just get that out there.
If America had a few more gifted young men like that who were willing to risk everything (including a freaksex girlfriend) to take on the government when it worked against the interests of her its people, this nation would be paradise.
So many people are so eager to say he's not a hero... And when they say that, I feel like they're showing their hearts to be a dusky and unused furnaces, with nothing in there but cold, filthy coals.
This guy came to a pinnacle of secret power in United States; he could have spied on any or all of us in ways we never dreamt of in our worst nightmares, and built God-knows what kind of empire for himself. Instead, he did what he needed to do to let us know that this resource, paid for with our own money and fully out of sight, was being used against us.
What could be more heroic? Who's a greater hero of the last fifty years?
"Instead, the rational sex, the proto-homo economicus, is shrugging off school and resigning itself to a life of shelf stocking. Why would that be?"
"This spring, another MIT economist, David Autor, and coauthor Melanie Wasserman, proposed an answer. The reason for boys’ dismal school performance, they argued, was the growing number of fatherless homes. Boys and young men weren’t behaving rationally, the theory suggested, because their family background left them without the necessary attitudes and skills to adapt to changing social and economic conditions. The paper generated a brief buzz but then vanished."
Conan the Grammarian
at December 16, 2013 12:45 PM
Hey Amy!
Check it out!
STUDIES! About family! Because we wouldn't know whether a loving mother and a loving father were what's best unless there was a "study," right?
From Coney's link:
“All other family structures appear detrimental to boys [my italics].”
His/her italics, not mine, but you see what they're getting at.
Crid [CridComment at Gmail]
at December 16, 2013 1:00 PM
I have no idea what they mean, but it sounds like something sophomore physics majors talk about in the dorm, sometime after being enlightened by a really righteous spliff...
Old RPM Daddy (OldRPMDaddy at GMail dot com)
at December 16, 2013 1:59 PM
On Friday, the George Soros funded group, Media Matters for America, declared victory over Fox News saying it had neutralized the cable news channel.
On Monday, Variety reported that in 2013 Fox News remained the most watched cable news channel in the country, "drawing more viewers than the combined averages of CNN, MSNBC and HLN."
In other news, the Obamacare Web site is a rousing success, Ambassador Scott Stevens' death was ruled a suicide, and Obama is more popular than ever with younger voters.
Conan the Grammarian
at December 16, 2013 4:26 PM
STUDIES! About family! Because we wouldn't know whether a loving mother and a loving father were what's best unless there was a "study," right?"
Why are you beating on your old straw man?
IIRC, Amy has never said that having a Mom and Dad was NOT superior to anything else - she said that having two gay parents was better than single parenthood.
Which is right.
Radwaste
at December 16, 2013 4:49 PM
Is that what she's saying? That's interesting.
Har! Just kidding! Haha!
It's not interesting, it's just evasive. All these other configurations might, in some daydreamy universe of frostless calculation and bloodless human attachments, vaguely describe the relative 7th- and 13th-best arrangements for kids. If you guys wanna quibble over things like that —whether Superman could defeat Might Mouse, as the movie once described it— then, y'know, go ahead knock yerselves out. But it would be mundane.
I'm concerned with what's best for kids.
(Also, I'm not sure that's how she feels about it. Also, I don't see why you'd be so certain it's right.)
The judge here did not mince words. Will be interesting to see this in front of the Supremes two years from now. -- Cousin Dave at December 16, 2013 6:44 PM
"(Also, I'm not sure that's how she feels about it...)"
Yet you comment anyway, taking a position you have thus made up, yourself.
Well, the first step is admitting you have a problem... you just expressed it.
All the artwork in your house consists of mirrors.
Radwaste
at December 17, 2013 3:57 AM
> Yet you comment anyway
Why not? You affirmed a position as being some one else's, but it seemed worth deflating nonetheless.
> taking a position you have thus made up,
> yourself.
Whence "thus"?
And where do you want my positions to come from?
> you just expressed it.
Expressed what?
> All the artwork in your house consists
> of mirrors.
Naw, mostly prints. Steichen, things like that. Industry stuff. Some Bouguereau in the baths.
Crid [CridComment at Gmail]
at December 17, 2013 11:11 AM
We are so fucked.
Yup. See debt clock, Obamacare clusterfuck and baby boomers not being replaced.
Dave B
at December 17, 2013 1:36 PM
The Daily Mail is reporting that Obama's meeting with tech executives about NSA spying was used as PR pitch for Obamacare Web site - execs not pleased.
For a guy who was once at the forefront of an amazingly in-touch presidential campaign, this guy really is politically tone deaf.
Conan the Grammarian
at December 17, 2013 3:30 PM
For a guy who was once at the forefront of an amazingly in-touch presidential campaign, this guy really is politically tone deaf.
Thats because he no longer has to shill to keep his job. If presidents didnt have a term limit he'd still be projecting his polished image. But at this point he has nothing to lose by showing his true colors so why wouldnt he?
Gay Paree's most elegant neighborhood.
Crid [CridComment at Gmail] at December 15, 2013 11:57 PM
Naked, unrepentant blog-comment Godwin violation.
(I don't care what you say, I'd feed it and give in a pillow to sleep on.)
One thing I really miss about the ol' CompuServe account was that the jump suits were really convenient when you were in the mood for sexual encounter. Worked great. Unless she was menstruating, because then you couldn't let her anywhere near your pristine bachelor pad.
Crid [CridComment at Gmail] at December 16, 2013 12:10 AM
Personally, I think Montmartre's a shithole. Still.
Amy Alkon at December 16, 2013 5:59 AM
Cuteness alert!!
o.O
Flynne at December 16, 2013 7:05 AM
"Cuteness alert!!"
I think the word is "awwwverdose." I'll have to show that one to my daughter!
Oh, by the way: The Redskins couldn't stop a team of Japanese dwarf flying squirrels!
Old RPM Daddy (OldRPMDaddy at GMail dot com) at December 16, 2013 7:36 AM
The Redskins couldn't stop a team of Japanese dwarf flying squirrels!
Yeah, well the Patriots sucked wind this weekend too. What a freakin' disappointment.
Flynne at December 16, 2013 7:44 AM
I thought these were sneeches?
Jim P. at December 16, 2013 8:47 AM
Nope, those are golden snitches.
Flynne at December 16, 2013 9:49 AM
Try this on: A union is saying right to work is slavery. But they aren't getting that forcing employees to join the union to work is taking away civil liberties too.
Jim P. at December 16, 2013 10:14 AM
Regarding the last line, let me be the one to just go ahead and say that Edward Snowden is a hero. M'kay? Let's just get that out there.
If America had a few more gifted young men like that who were willing to risk everything (including a freaksex girlfriend) to take on the government when it worked against the interests of her its people, this nation would be paradise.
So many people are so eager to say he's not a hero... And when they say that, I feel like they're showing their hearts to be a dusky and unused furnaces, with nothing in there but cold, filthy coals.
This guy came to a pinnacle of secret power in United States; he could have spied on any or all of us in ways we never dreamt of in our worst nightmares, and built God-knows what kind of empire for himself. Instead, he did what he needed to do to let us know that this resource, paid for with our own money and fully out of sight, was being used against us.
What could be more heroic? Who's a greater hero of the last fifty years?
Crid [CridComment at Gmail] at December 16, 2013 10:35 AM
Cammy.
I love that woman.
Crid [CridComment at Gmail] at December 16, 2013 12:07 PM
Couldn't go gay even if you wanted to.
Crid [CridComment at Gmail] at December 16, 2013 12:19 PM
Another study shows two-parent families better for children (especially boys):
http://www.city-journal.org/2013/23_4_boy-trouble.html
"Instead, the rational sex, the proto-homo economicus, is shrugging off school and resigning itself to a life of shelf stocking. Why would that be?"
"This spring, another MIT economist, David Autor, and coauthor Melanie Wasserman, proposed an answer. The reason for boys’ dismal school performance, they argued, was the growing number of fatherless homes. Boys and young men weren’t behaving rationally, the theory suggested, because their family background left them without the necessary attitudes and skills to adapt to changing social and economic conditions. The paper generated a brief buzz but then vanished."
Conan the Grammarian at December 16, 2013 12:45 PM
Hey Amy!
Check it out!
STUDIES! About family! Because we wouldn't know whether a loving mother and a loving father were what's best unless there was a "study," right?
From Coney's link:
His/her italics, not mine, but you see what they're getting at.
Crid [CridComment at Gmail] at December 16, 2013 1:00 PM
Þ Reddit: Two shoes, a tree.
Crid [CridComment at Gmail] at December 16, 2013 1:00 PM
Like, scientists in Japan are suggesting the universe could totally be a hologram.
I have no idea what they mean, but it sounds like something sophomore physics majors talk about in the dorm, sometime after being enlightened by a really righteous spliff...
Old RPM Daddy (OldRPMDaddy at GMail dot com) at December 16, 2013 1:59 PM
On Friday, the George Soros funded group, Media Matters for America, declared victory over Fox News saying it had neutralized the cable news channel.
On Monday, Variety reported that in 2013 Fox News remained the most watched cable news channel in the country, "drawing more viewers than the combined averages of CNN, MSNBC and HLN."
http://variety.com/2013/tv/news/fox-news-remains-ratings-dynamo-as-2013-comes-to-close-1200964903/
In other news, the Obamacare Web site is a rousing success, Ambassador Scott Stevens' death was ruled a suicide, and Obama is more popular than ever with younger voters.
Conan the Grammarian at December 16, 2013 4:26 PM
STUDIES! About family! Because we wouldn't know whether a loving mother and a loving father were what's best unless there was a "study," right?"
Why are you beating on your old straw man?
IIRC, Amy has never said that having a Mom and Dad was NOT superior to anything else - she said that having two gay parents was better than single parenthood.
Which is right.
Radwaste at December 16, 2013 4:49 PM
Is that what she's saying? That's interesting.
Har! Just kidding! Haha!
It's not interesting, it's just evasive. All these other configurations might, in some daydreamy universe of frostless calculation and bloodless human attachments, vaguely describe the relative 7th- and 13th-best arrangements for kids. If you guys wanna quibble over things like that —whether Superman could defeat Might Mouse, as the movie once described it— then, y'know, go ahead knock yerselves out. But it would be mundane.
I'm concerned with what's best for kids.
(Also, I'm not sure that's how she feels about it. Also, I don't see why you'd be so certain it's right.)
Crid [CridComment at Gmail] at December 16, 2013 5:11 PM
I'm concerned with what's best for kids.
Bullshit. Your only concern is with being right, or more accurately being SEEN as being right
lujlp at December 16, 2013 6:18 PM
Big Time Slap in the Face for the NSA and the FISA Court, from the D.C. Circuit. The judge here did not mince words. Will be interesting to see this in front of the Supremes two years from now.
Cousin Dave at December 16, 2013 6:44 PM
You mean after Obama packs SCOTUS?
Yes but it doesn't fucking matter as they lie and delay the shit like the EPA regs.
Until we get the Liberty Amendments incorporated our federal government to stop using the Constitutions as toilet paper it isn't going to get better.
Jim P. at December 16, 2013 7:19 PM
"(Also, I'm not sure that's how she feels about it...)"
Yet you comment anyway, taking a position you have thus made up, yourself.
Well, the first step is admitting you have a problem... you just expressed it.
All the artwork in your house consists of mirrors.
Radwaste at December 17, 2013 3:57 AM
> Yet you comment anyway
Why not? You affirmed a position as being some one else's, but it seemed worth deflating nonetheless.
> taking a position you have thus made up,
> yourself.
Whence "thus"?
And where do you want my positions to come from?
> you just expressed it.
Expressed what?
> All the artwork in your house consists
> of mirrors.
Naw, mostly prints. Steichen, things like that. Industry stuff. Some Bouguereau in the baths.
Crid [CridComment at Gmail] at December 17, 2013 11:11 AM
We are so fucked.
Yup. See debt clock, Obamacare clusterfuck and baby boomers not being replaced.
Dave B at December 17, 2013 1:36 PM
The Daily Mail is reporting that Obama's meeting with tech executives about NSA spying was used as PR pitch for Obamacare Web site - execs not pleased.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2525447/Obama-hijacks-tech-executive-meeting-changes-subject-NSA-surveillance-healthcare-gov-fixes.html
For a guy who was once at the forefront of an amazingly in-touch presidential campaign, this guy really is politically tone deaf.
Conan the Grammarian at December 17, 2013 3:30 PM
For a guy who was once at the forefront of an amazingly in-touch presidential campaign, this guy really is politically tone deaf.
Thats because he no longer has to shill to keep his job. If presidents didnt have a term limit he'd still be projecting his polished image. But at this point he has nothing to lose by showing his true colors so why wouldnt he?
lujlp at December 18, 2013 11:49 AM
Leave a comment