Affordable For Whom? Even Obama's Union Base Is Grousing
Paul Bedard writes about Obamacare and the hospitality workers' union in the WashEx:
A national union that represents 300,000 low-wage hospitality workers charges in a new report that Obamacare will slam wages, cut hours, limit access to health insurance and worsen the very "income equality" President Obama says he is campaigning to fix.Unite Here warned that due to Obamacare's much higher costs for health insurance than what union workers currently pay, the result will be a pay cut of up to $5 an hour. "If employers follow the incentives in the law, they will push families onto the exchanges to buy coverage. This will force low-wage service industry employees to spend $2.00, $3.00 or even $5.00 an hour of their pay to buy similar coverage," said the union in a new report.
"Only in Washington could asking the bottom of the middle class to finance health care for the poorest families be seen as reducing inequality," said the report from Unite Here. "Without smart fixes, the ACA threatens the middle class with higher premiums, loss of hours, and a shift to part-time work and less comprehensive coverage," said the report, titled, "The Irony of Obamacare: Making Inequality Worse."
Based on government and private reports, polling and statements from administration officials, the report, to be sent to pro-union members in Congress, charges that low-wage workers are taking the hit under Obamacare, while wealthy insurance companies fatten up on government subsidies.








Ha! They seem to be like "no one saw this coming?"
And, of course, it is so typical of those on the left to blame "Washington" instead of Democrats or Obama.
Wishful thinking on my part as it won't happen; but, maybe now more folks will realize that when a politician says something is "free" and they don't say exactly WHO will pay for it, they mean YOU will pay for it.
Charles at March 10, 2014 6:18 AM
As is the case with most of the Left's supposed fixes for supposed problems, it's like something you see in the news periodically: a person is originally hailed as a hero because he extinguished a fire in a building or property, only to have investigation uncover the fact that the "hero" set the fire himself. Because there wasn't a health care crisis in the U.S., it was necessary to create one. First objective accomplished. Now watch for what the second one will be.
Cousin Dave at March 10, 2014 7:46 AM
"it is so typical of those on the left to blame "Washington" instead of "
Once you realize the two parties in this country are the Monied Elite With Access vs Everyone Else, this left/right hyperbole will vanish like Bush's TANG records or Ted Kennedy's sobriety. Poof.
Gog_Magog_Carpet_Reclaimers at March 10, 2014 2:25 PM
Well according to the UAW you, as an employee, can't complain to the NLRB unless you are represented by the union you voted against.
Jim P. at March 11, 2014 1:35 PM
Gog, I don't know where you've been reading, but I've seen articles on Mr. Bush's National Guard service. There are plenty of people manufacturing outrage that he didn't spend 100% of his time in uniform during the period, and in fact his service may have been less than stellar, but those records are not missing.
Radwaste at March 11, 2014 5:14 PM
Leave a comment