'We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases."
The Woody Allen sex scandal of 2013 triggered a national conversation on who to believe, with people lining up on each side as if they knew what really happened. Based on recent research on how people navigate the often tricky waters of sexual negotiation, Dr. Carol Tavris shows that it is entirely possible in some sexual assault cases neither side is lying, but instead both sides feel justified in their positions. This talk was considered one of the best ever given at The Amazing Meeting.
Dr. Carol Tavris shows that it is entirely possible in some sexual assault cases neither side is lying, but instead both sides feel justified in their positions.
Ok, so how can two different account of whether or not a crime occurred both be right. Can a mugger and a muggging victim both be right when they say the exact opposite thing happened?
I dont care how people feel about what happened. In cases like sexual assault I care about what objectively happened.
"A postponed tsunami of discontent awaits Obamacare, just around the time the president exits office" http://nyv.me/l/dmns
Amy Alkon at August 5, 2014 11:46 PM
Amy Alkon
https://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2014/08/lumpy-3.html#comment-4914968">comment from Amy Alkon@PJMedia_com
Cafe Adds “Minimum Wage Fee” to Customer’s Checks http://bit.ly/1tVg7PL
Amy Alkon
at August 5, 2014 11:58 PM
You guys were wondering where this was.
It's here. Tilt up to see the Viaduct.
No prob.
Crid [CridComment at Gmail] at August 6, 2014 1:45 AM
Stars Face Hollywood Backlash in War of Words Over Israel
Jim P. at August 6, 2014 2:18 PM
Pat Condell: Hypocrisy over Gaza
Jim P. at August 6, 2014 2:41 PM
Here's a Carol Tavris talk from last month's TAM 2014.
Who's Lying, Who's Self-Justifying? Origins of the He Said/She Said Gap in Sexual Allegations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SpVVsOUsLo
The Woody Allen sex scandal of 2013 triggered a national conversation on who to believe, with people lining up on each side as if they knew what really happened. Based on recent research on how people navigate the often tricky waters of sexual negotiation, Dr. Carol Tavris shows that it is entirely possible in some sexual assault cases neither side is lying, but instead both sides feel justified in their positions. This talk was considered one of the best ever given at The Amazing Meeting.
jerry at August 6, 2014 3:02 PM
Amy Alkon
https://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2014/08/lumpy-3.html#comment-4917116">comment from jerryYour tax dollars! DHS spends $450,000 on gym memberships for TSA and ICE employees with desk jobs at a DC procurement office.
http://freebeacon.com/issues/homeland-security-spends-450000-on-state-of-the-art-gym-memberships/
Amy Alkon
at August 6, 2014 5:21 PM
Dr. Carol Tavris shows that it is entirely possible in some sexual assault cases neither side is lying, but instead both sides feel justified in their positions.
Ok, so how can two different account of whether or not a crime occurred both be right. Can a mugger and a muggging victim both be right when they say the exact opposite thing happened?
I dont care how people feel about what happened. In cases like sexual assault I care about what objectively happened.
lujlp at August 6, 2014 6:40 PM
Leave a comment