Why Is It The Govt's Business If I Want To Buy Raw Milk And Someone With A Cow Or Goat Wants To Sell It To Me?
Kenric Ward writes at Watchdog.org about an amendment about to be debated by the Virginia General Assembly guaranteeing the right to buy homegrown and raised food items at Virginia farms:
According to the amendment: "The people shall have the right to acquire for their own consumption farm-produced food directly at the farm with agreement from the farmer who produced it.""Right now, you have right to purchase food of your choice - but regulations prevent the right (of farmers) to sell them. This amendment gives consumers standing in court," says Lois Smith, president of the Virginia Independent Consumers and Farmers Association.
...Christine Solem of Charlottesville says Virginia would be the first state to pass such a constitutional amendment.
"This is a fundamental right," she told Watchdog in an interview. "It's not a health issue -- it's a matter of personal liberty."
Solem, who used to raise goats for goat milk, cites the example of raw milk, whose sale is prohibited in Virginia but allowed in 29 other states.
Only through "herd-sharing" contracts -- in which a "share" of a dairy cow is purchased -- can a person legally buy raw milk in Virginia.
"They're essentially paying the farmer to milk the cow," says Matthew French, a free-range farmer in Bland, Va.
Solem notes that VICFA's measure precludes Internet purchases or sales at farmers markets. The amendment covers only farm-based transactions with individuals.
Joel Salatin, owner of Polyface Farms in Swoope, Va., sees the constitutional amendment "as remediation for a centuries-old oversight to a fundamental human right that the framers of the original Bill of Rights could not have foreseen. They could not have imagined that a day would come when it would be illegal for someone to sell a glass of raw milk to a neighbor."
via @reasonpolicy








Not this crap again. Holy hypocrisy, Batman!
Government is IN the food inspection business because the PUBLIC EXPECTS TO BE PROTECTED AGAINST FOODBORNE ILLNESSES in COMMERCIAL VENTURES. Government operates the COURTS in which YOU will seek redress if YOU are injured by an improper food handling process executed on the food YOU eat. YOU are INCOMPETENT of determining whether a food handling procedure is valid or if bacterial or chemical agents are present in the food you buy. In some cases, YOU will be permanently injured or killed by faulty practices, AND NO INSURANCE OR LEGAL PENALTY WILL UNDO THAT.
Food manufacturing, distribution and handling guidelines, no matter if they have penalties attached, are distributed because startups often have no idea. This is why church dinners sicken people despite the best intentions of the elders.
Organics ARE PERMITTED. I have linked to the Happy Cow Creamery, in SC, as an example many times. I have ALSO noted several times that it is the PREVENTION aspect of food handling regulations, NOT INSPECTION, that provides you safety.
Yet here you are again. The house you live in was wired according to code. The car you drive was built under a myriad of regulations so you aren't impaled because of a speed bump. Laws insist that the medicines you take are both subject to purity standards and accompanied by a monograph describing as much as is practical about them. The airplane you take to France has passenger limits determined by international regulations, and its every move, from pushback to parked, is controlled by the FAA - and you have lamented the uncontrolled nature of private aircraft.
But raw milk is the issue. Wow.
I expect to see another story of a sleepy USDA inspector falsifying documents as justification for installing an "anything-goes" market.
"Oh, yeah, don't buy from Al's Meats, Grandma died from eating his pork."
Look around. Get consistent. Take a pill or something, because consmer protections are here to stay and you are benefited enormously by them right now.
Radwaste at December 31, 2014 6:00 AM
Amy Alkon
https://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2014/12/why-is-it-the-g.html#comment-5724078">comment from RadwasteIt should be my right to choose to not have government intervening in what I eat.
Government, by the way, promoted the non-science-based wildly unhealthy high-carb, low-fat diet that made Americans obese.
Amy Alkon
at December 31, 2014 6:17 AM
Are people really so desperate for raw milk? Are people sitting at home with a tall glass doing a spit take with the pasteurized crap? "This tastes like shit! Get me some of that sweet, sweet, raw stuff, with all the delicious bacteria in it!!"
clinky at December 31, 2014 7:29 AM
Amy Alkon
https://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2014/12/why-is-it-the-g.html#comment-5724391">comment from clinkyI want unpasteurized cheese. We had a place where you could buy it in Venice, but a SWAT team came and shut it down. People wanted to buy it. People wanted to sell it to us. But the government got between these willing transactors and said no.
Amy Alkon
at December 31, 2014 7:44 AM
Radwaste, what you say is all well and good if I were to buy a pack of Cherrios off of the shelf, or some hamburger meat at the market. My wife was in charge of various departments at one time or another (some multiples at the same time) of a USDA inspected food plant. I am familiar with what it takes to make clean good food and the inspections and control associated with that. Having said that you miss the whole point of this. People buying raw milk have a choice. They are quite free to go to the store and buy pasteurized milk, frequently made with USDA approved Bovine Growth Hormone, but if they decide to take it upon themselves to take the risks involved with buying raw milk Uncle Sam has his big fat nose in his business. That is the objection, are we free or are we not, that is the question. If Monsanto and other agri-bigs (yes new word, just made it up) did not have such a hold on the federal government maybe we could trust the feds to work on our behalf. Unfortunately that situation does not exist. Virginia is making the right move. Let's hope that it passes.
Nelson Struck at December 31, 2014 9:49 AM
Radwaste, what you say is all well and good if I were to buy a pack of Cherrios off of the shelf, or some hamburger meat at the market. My wife was in charge of various departments at one time or another (some multiples at the same time) of a USDA inspected food plant. I am familiar with what it takes to make clean good food and the inspections and control associated with that. Having said that you miss the whole point of this. People buying raw milk have a choice. They are quite free to go to the store and buy pasteurized milk, frequently made with USDA approved Bovine Growth Hormone, but if they decide to take it upon themselves to take the risks involved with buying raw milk Uncle Sam has his big fat nose in his business. That is the objection, are we free or are we not, that is the question. If Monsanto and other agri-bigs (yes new word, just made it up) did not have such a hold on the federal government maybe we could trust the feds to work on our behalf. Unfortunately that situation does not exist. Virginia is making the right move. Let's hope that it passes.
Nelson Struck at December 31, 2014 9:49 AM
I'm in Virginia and was actually at a family farm with a scout group. They had one dairy cow and fed the leftover milk to the pigs because they couldn't sell it. They drank it raw themselves though, and I would have no compunction about buying some from them (they actually apologized that they couldn't give us any due to regulations).
I have started hearing mumblings that the pasteurization process can alter some of the milk proteins and change how our bodies interact with the milk. I haven't searched the literature. Amy, have you heard anything along these lines?
I also know that some people feel raw milk, like local raw honey, can help with seasonal allergies.
Shannon at December 31, 2014 9:49 AM
Don't our cops and civil service workers have better things to do than interfere with VOLUNTARY transactions between INDIVIDUAL citizens ??
Now, mind you, I buy my beef and pork on the hoof, from a farmer I've known for years. I pay a flat rate per pound, a fee for slaughter and butchering, and 5 days later, I fill the back of the van with enough frozen beef and pork in sealed vaccuum packs to fill a medium chest freezer.
I chose the cut, the thickness of the steaks, even the fat mixture of the ground beef and pork.
And I have several friends who run farms, I buy honey and eggs from them.
What, pray tell, am I doing so wrong here that cops should get involved ??
Keith Glass at December 31, 2014 9:50 AM
All outbreaks of salmonella from contaminated milk in recent decades — and there have been many — have occurred in pasteurized milk. This includes a 1985 outbreak in Illinois that struck 14,316 people causing at least one death.
Raw milk contains lactic-acid-producing bacteria that protect against pathogens. Pasteurization destroys these helpful organisms, leaving the
finished product devoid of any protective mechanism should undesirable bacteria inadvertently contaminate the supply. Raw milk in time turns pleasantly sour while pasteurized milk, lacking beneficial bacteria, will putrefy.
But that’s not all that pasteurization does to milk. Heat alters milk’s amino acids lysine and tyrosine, making the whole complex of proteins
less available; it promotes rancidity of unsaturated fatty acids and
destruction of vitamins.
Vitamin C loss in pasteurization usually exceeds 50%; loss of other water-soluble vitamins can run as high as 80%; the Wulzen or anti-stiffness factor is totally destroyed.
Pasteurization alters milk’s mineral components such as calcium,
chlorine, magnesium, phosphorus, potassium, sodium and sulphur as well as many trace minerals, making them less available
Last but not least, pasteurization destroys all the enzymes in milk— in fact, the test for successful pasteurization is absence of enzymes.
These enzymes help the body assimilate all bodybuilding factors,
including calcium. That is why those who drink pasteurized milk may
suffer, nevertheless, from osteoporosis.
joe wahler at December 31, 2014 11:28 AM
"Government, by the way, promoted the non-science-based wildly unhealthy high-carb, low-fat diet that made Americans obese."
Ah, yes. "Government". Completely illogical. Isn't this supposed to be a blog of logic and reason?
It's not on this issue.
To paraphrase Orwell, you recline in comfort because rough men stand ready to keep you from poisoning yourself.
Any number of deaths is completely OK so long as you get to buy the food and drugs you want. Right?
Well, chances are, laws about weed don't bother you - this law shouldn't bother you, either. Go right ahead and ingest whatever you want - because the law you're complaining about affects commercial sales, not private transactions.
We can all hear next year about how Kaiser won't pay for your liver flukes.
By the way, Joe:
"All outbreaks of salmonella from contaminated milk in recent decades — and there have been many — have occurred in pasteurized milk."
This illustrates your lack of logical discipline. "Outbreaks", by definition, happen to widely-distributed entities. The logical and rational statement regarding this would actually be, "Pasteurization and other existing controls have failed to protect the public from several salmonella outbreaks" - and then the reason for the failures could be discussed.
Why? Because pasteurization doesn't cause salmonella.
There is a reason grocery store chains can put milk on the shelf with generally accurate expiration dates. Can you guess what that is?
Again, the blog of science and reason fails to present them consistently!
Radwaste at December 31, 2014 1:05 PM
PUBLIC EXPECTS TO BE PROTECTED AGAINST FOODBORNE ILLNESSES in COMMERCIAL VENTURES
Yes, yes, Radwaste. I see a similar warning in restaurants about "raw or undercooked food may lead to sickness or death" as they attempt to get me to order my steak at medium or higher, or my oysters[1] to be non-raw.
Methinks the people buying raw milk understand the risks they take. Perhaps the dairyman can post a similar notice and you'll be satisfied?
On the other hand, if I were an actual dairyman, there would be no way in hell I'm selling anyone raw milk other than a commercial outfit. The first person who gets seriously ill (or worse) will end up suing the batsnot out of me. Not. Worth. It.
[1] I would not voluntarily eat oysters, raw or otherwise. I take my steaks at half-past moo.
I R A Darth Aggie at December 31, 2014 1:32 PM
Any number of deaths is completely OK so long as you get to buy the food and drugs you want. Right?
As opposed to
Any number of deaths is completely OK so long as [others dont] get to buy the food and drugs you [dont] want. Right?
lujlp at December 31, 2014 2:34 PM
Methinks the people buying raw milk understand the risks they take.
Really?
I think Amy understands the risks she takes. Not sure about the population at large.
(BTW, cheese made with unpasteurized milk is for sale in various food/drink markets in Texas. Not sure what the regulations are surrounding this, but it's common enough and open enough that there's no way the practice is banned by law. Amy, if you come to Texas to promote your book, head over to the nearest Central Market or Spec's and ask around.)
marion at December 31, 2014 2:53 PM
Amy Alkon
https://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2014/12/why-is-it-the-g.html#comment-5726230">comment from marionThanks, marion! And similarly, I eat meat that's still mooing.
I do understand the risks. And the few times I've found raw milk cheese here or there, it always has some sort of death notice or something on it. (Not death, exactly, but a note saying it's not pasteurized, may be risky for pregnant women, etc.)
Amy Alkon
at December 31, 2014 4:25 PM
Are people really so desperate for raw milk?
Who gives a fuck? Better question, why the hell do they send ARMED S.W.A.T. teams with live weapons into farmers markets and other businesses to prevent it?
lujlp at January 1, 2015 3:27 PM
"I do understand the risks."
Nonsense. Show me how you know the next raw product you consume doesn't have paraquat or RoundUp in it.
"As opposed to
Any number of deaths is completely OK so long as [others dont] get to buy the food and drugs you [dont] want. Right?"
Jesus, you're inventing new ways to be wrong. Please use a search engine and try to understand logical fallacies before you waste more time like this.
Radwaste at January 1, 2015 3:46 PM
Amy Alkon
https://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2014/12/why-is-it-the-g.html#comment-5729892">comment from Radwaste"I do understand the risks." Nonsense. Show me how you know the next raw product you consume doesn't have paraquat or RoundUp in it.
Show me that you "know" that any of your food is safe. Believing that it is because the government "inspects" it is the real logical fallacy here.
And as I've written before, it is not in the interests of a business to poison people. People don't go into business for a day or a week, but to earn a consistent living.
Amy Alkon
at January 1, 2015 3:56 PM
"Believing that it is because the government "inspects" it is the real logical fallacy here."
Wow, you have some serious blinders on about this. And I have written again and again about this!
Government inspections are only part of the story. Standards, establishing safe practices, produces the handling methods which provide your consumer protections.
Standards work to produce the safe environment you now enjoy. That's something you can actually see in place today. It is NOT a logical deduction or fantasy!
Proper inspections only determine if the standards are being followed. You are arguing that because some inspections are ineffective, they are worthless. That is blatantly false, and this would be easily apparent if you applied the concept to anything else. How about this one: "Some police are ineffective, so there shouldn't be any police."
Carry this further: you should not have to vaccinate your kids (you can't tell if the people around you have communicable viruses). The counter help at McDonald's should not have to wash their hands (you won't know, and you can't tell if their hands are actually clean). Nobody should tell you if their hot sauce has MSG in it (you can't tell unless they disclose that). UL shouldn't check the construction of your microwave - if it shocks you, you'll survive to turn it back in for another one (also without an inspection sticker).
Here's one you'll appreciate: you should just step into the Rapiscan 1000, because it obviously isn't harmful.
What? All of a sudden you clamor for testing? Why?
Radwaste at January 1, 2015 9:41 PM
Amy Alkon
https://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2014/12/why-is-it-the-g.html#comment-5730885">comment from RadwasteEver eat dinner at a friend's house without the government inspectors coming through first?
Amy Alkon
at January 1, 2015 10:42 PM
Ever eat dinner at a friend's house without the government inspectors coming through first?
Posted by: Amy Alkon at January 1, 2015 10:42 PM
Yes, and I occasionally eat street food in Asia. (Gasp)
We are all bags of bacteria. The human body is pretty adept at using the good bacteria to choke out the bad.
You can live your life in a bubble, or train your immune system to be healthy and strong,
This is one of those areas, where a good offense, is better than a great defense.
Local and state authorities crack down on the selling of raw milk, for the same reason they crack down on Uber and Lyft.
They are in bed with, and funded by the tax dollars and fees from the competition.
Isab at January 2, 2015 7:38 AM
Amy Alkon
https://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2014/12/why-is-it-the-g.html#comment-5731917">comment from IsabIsab is exactly right. Inspected restaurants aren't so clean, and they don't have an inspector standing over every employee making sure they've washed their hands properly -- or at all.
Amy Alkon
at January 2, 2015 8:18 AM
Nonsense. Show me how you know the next raw product you consume doesn't have paraquat or RoundUp in it.
Show me how you prove that burger form the inspected Jack in the Box wont kill you with e-coli
lujlp at January 2, 2015 1:46 PM
Nonsense. Show me how you know the next raw product you consume doesn't have paraquat or RoundUp in it.
Show me how you prove that burger form the inspected Jack in the Box wont kill you with e-coli
Posted by: lujlp at January 2, 2015 1:46 PM
Not to mention food products imported from China, and other countries.
A tiny percentage of those imports are tested, and they have found some really bad stuff in some of the processed foods, and the fresh ones.
Also, you can drink Roundup with fewer ill effects, than a microscopic amount of botulism.
Isab at January 2, 2015 4:57 PM
Amy Alkon
https://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2014/12/why-is-it-the-g.html#comment-5733303">comment from IsabWe never buy any food that's from China for us or for my dog. Sure not about to let the government, which lets these foods in, account for her safety.
Amy Alkon
at January 2, 2015 6:17 PM
Well, then -- I suppose there isn't any reason for OSHA, either.
After all, those workers are professionals, fully capable of recognizing when their workplace is unsafe!
Hypocrite.
Radwaste at January 6, 2015 9:58 AM
"We never buy any food that's from China for us or for my dog. Sure not about to let the government, which lets these foods in, account for her safety."
I missed this awesome, and I mean truly awesome gem!
The only way you can know if food is from China is because of a Federal regulation!
Radwaste at November 23, 2016 1:02 PM
Leave a comment