Background Checks Don't Equal Racism
If you're hiring somebody to deal with money your company's bringing in, do you maybe want to make sure they aren't a mini-Madoff?
Problem: The government, through the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, was deeming background checks racism.
The EEOC got another reminder from the court -- this time, a federal court of appeals -- that background checks are a necessary part of doing business.
Todd Lebowitz writes at The Hill:
In EEOC v Freeman, the commission once again relied on the statistical analysis of an industrial psychologist to try to prove that an event planning company discriminated against black male job applicants when it ran credit and criminal background checks. On Feb. 20, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the statistical case presented by the EEOC was "rife with analytical errors," "completely unreliable," and contained a "mind-boggling number of errors and unexplained discrepancies." The Fourth Circuit judges tossed the EEOC's case, just as the Sixth Circuit did in 2014, when the EEOC relied on the same expert whose report was rejected for containing the same types of fatal flaws.For years, the EEOC has doggedly pursued litigation against companies whose background check procedures it deemed too expansive and discriminatory. The EEOC's strategy relies on the observation that, under certain circumstances, the use of criminal background and credit checks as a pre-hiring screen tends to eliminate minority applicants in disproportionate numbers. The EEOC claims that this violates Title VII.
But wait a minute. Just because your arthritis got better doesn't mean it was because of the Cosmos Bag. Correlation and causation are not the same thing.
Statistical data show that a higher proportion of minorities have criminal records than non-minorities. The NAACP reports that African Americans and Hispanics makeup 58 percent of prisoners, despite making up only a quarter of the general population. There are undoubtedly a variety of factors that influence those numbers, but employers who perform routine background checks on prospective hires have no control over whom police arrest, governments prosecute, or juries convict. If there is injustice in the justice system, employers performing background checks are not the ones to blame.
The reason that criminal background checks reveal more convictions for minorities is because more minorities have been convicted, not because employers who run pre-hire background checks are engaging in unlawful discrimination.
via @overlawyered








So, on the one hand the government says "these people are criminals"
On the other hand, the government says "its racist of you to believe the government when we say these people are criminals"
lujlp at March 14, 2015 1:06 AM
Sheesh, when employers take actions to protect themselves from crooks and frauds members of the EEOC react like it's directed at them.
Ken R at March 14, 2015 4:52 AM
"The NAACP reports that African Americans and Hispanics makeup 58 percent of prisoners, despite making up only a quarter of the general population."
And, other than blaming "the man" for this, what is the NAACP doing about that?
charles at March 14, 2015 6:18 AM
The EEOC made its mistake by going after criminal background checks AND credit checks. If they just stuck to trying to get rid of credit checks, they would probably have more success.
Fayd at March 14, 2015 7:54 AM
A credit check, used correctly, will generally tell you everything you need to know about someone's reliability as an employee.
Somehow it is tough to build good credit, or a credit history in prison.
Yes, there are some good people with bad credit. Many of them who made the mistake of marrying the wrong person, but that situation can be sorted out by a potential employer,
And lose or no credit checks on minorities was one of the fundamental problems that caused the financial meltdown in 2008.
We have another one coming when more people figure out, how many of the student loans are bad.
Isab at March 14, 2015 10:21 AM
I wonder if the EEOC is willing to go so far as to ban background checks on potential school employees? Those checks are required by state law in most states.
(I know, that's the "won't someone think of the children" line of argument.)
David Crawford at March 14, 2015 4:59 PM
Background checks for government security clearances almost certainly have a disparate impact. I can guarantee you that the EEOC isn't touching that. For one thing, it would impact the EEOC itself; it doubtless does background checks on people in legal or other trust positions.
Cousin Dave at March 16, 2015 11:18 AM
That came up in prior court cases CD. Yes the EEOC does background checks and no they don't intend to stop.
Ben at March 16, 2015 12:14 PM
Leave a comment