There Is No Free Speech In Islam
So-called "moderate" Muslims are Muslims who are not practicing Islam as it is commanded to be practiced by the Quran, which is said to be the eternal word of Allah and unquestionable by anyone. But for the fact that there are so many of us "infidels" (dirty "kuffar") all around the planet, speaking (and cartooning) freely, those Muslims would likely be on the death lists of more orthodox Musilms.
In USA Today, UK-dwelling Muslim cleric Anjem Choudary explains:
Contrary to popular misconception, Islam does not mean peace but rather means submission to the commands of Allah alone. Therefore, Muslims do not believe in the concept of freedom of expression, as their speech and actions are determined by divine revelation and not based on people's desires....Muslims consider the honor of the Prophet Muhammad to be dearer to them than that of their parents or even themselves. To defend it is considered to be an obligation upon them. The strict punishment if found guilty of this crime under sharia (Islamic law) is capital punishment implementable by an Islamic State. This is because the Messenger Muhammad said, "Whoever insults a Prophet kill him."
Islamic "tolerance"? I believe Molly Norris, who called for the "Draw Mohammed Day" is still in hiding.
Denis MacEoin writes at Gatestone Institute about the Islamic erosion of free speech in the West:
Criticism of Islam and everything else will -- and should -- continue, produced by courageous writers and journalists. Certainly, we know how many times politicians in the United States and Europe have delusionally tried to persuade us that Islamist violence "has nothing to do with Islam."There have been many attacks and murders already. Perhaps the best known of these -- until the Charlie Hebdo murders -- was the murder of Dutch film-maker, Theo van Gogh, on November 2, 2004. Van Gogh had directed a short film called Submission, written by Muslim dissident Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who had worked extensively in women's shelters in the Netherlands, where she had observed that most of the women were Muslim. Van Gogh's killer, a 26-year-old Dutch-Moroccan named Mohammed Bouyeri, now serving a life sentence, has described democracy as utterly abhorrent to Islam. (This view, for anyone who cares about the continuation of the West, is held by many Muslims. For them, democracy, made by man, is illegitimate, compared to shari'a law, made by Allah, and therefore the only form of government that is legitimate.) In court, Bouyeri said that 'the law [shari'a law] compels me to chop off the head of anyone who insults Allah and the prophet."
The threat of murder has become ever more real. It is no longer possible to dismiss death threats from Muslims as the work of "lone wolves," "deviant personalities," or attention seekers. It is the use of death threats that has given radical Muslims the power to deter most writers, film-makers, TV producers, and politicians from tackling Islamic issues. The threat of calling people "racist" as a tool for suppressing critical voices has cast a dark shadow over normal democratic life. Some have died for free speech about Islam; others have faced ostracism, imprisonment, flogging and the loss of a normal life. [7]
Salman Rushdie lives under constant guard. Molly Norris, an American artist who drew a cartoon of Mohammed and proposed an "Everybody Draw Mohammed Day," has lived in hiding since 2010. On advice from the FBI, she changed her identity and cut off all links with family and friends. The Dutch politician Geert Wilders has been tried for "hate speech," barely acquitted, and is now being tried for "hate speech" again.
These are just a few of the casualties who have paid a heavy price for their willingness to treat Islam as any of us might treat other subjects or other faiths. No Christian scholar will be tried for arguing that the Gospels contain contradictions, no Reform Jew will be arraigned for criticism of ultra-Orthodox beliefs, no politician will be brought before the law for denouncing the ideologies of Communism or Fascism. You can say that Karl Marx was misguided or that a U.S. president is terrible, and on and on, without dreading for a moment an assassin's footfall or being locked up for your remarks.
MacEoin takes note of the double standard:
It is also necessary to ask, if Geert Wilders and others are being accused of hate speech, then why isn't the Koran -- with its calls for smiting necks and killing infidels -- also being accused of hate speech?
Just to be clear, I'm against "hate speech" laws, but the guy has a point.








Mocking religion isn't "hate speech" and "they had it coming" is not a tenable position for a free people:
http://thefederalist.com/2015/05/04/mocking-religion-is-not-hate-speech/
Amy Alkon at May 4, 2015 10:51 AM
Oh, Amy.
Haroon begs to differ.
Gog_Magog_Carpet_Reclaimers at May 4, 2015 7:44 PM
Here is what nobody is smart enough to recognize: There are different kinds of "offending people". Offense that comes as the unfortunate result of well-meaning people seeking truth is the kind of offense that everyone thinks is justified. But the Charlies and the Mollies are not doing that. They are offending for the purpose of hurting people, because they like to hurt people. This is a different kind of offending, and as far as I am concerned, anything bad that happens to the Charlies and the Mollies is fine by me. It is undeniable that the world is better off without people whose whole purpose is to hurt other people.
Alan at May 4, 2015 8:10 PM
From the website that Alan's name links to: "Many people will be annoyed or angered by something that they read in the following observations. " So... it's okay for you to do it.
Cousin Dave at May 5, 2015 7:20 AM
" It is undeniable that the world is better off without people whose whole purpose is to hurt other people."
Like terrorists, for example.
Gog_Magog_Carpet_Reclaimers at May 5, 2015 7:40 AM
So... it's okay for you to do it.
It shore is, since SJW’S DO NOT VIEW ALL HUMANS AS EQUAL.
SJW’s do not believe in objectivity. Instead, speech and ideas must be viewed relatively depending on the source and its intended audience. The feeling of the statement must also be taken into account, which can be affected by current news, cultural moods, and pop trends.
Stinky the Clown at May 5, 2015 9:55 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7TAAw3oQvg
Ben Shapiro: The Myth of the Tiny Radical Muslim Minority 6:17
An amazing number of Muslims support killing the infidel at least some of the time.
Andrew_M_Garland at May 5, 2015 10:01 AM
Bollocks.
"The Charlies and Mollies" are emphasizing that those of us who are not Muslim have no obligation to knuckle under to Islamic demands.
Along with pointing out the brutal and totalitarian nature of Islam.
Yes, I'm sure there most Muslims don't actually believe their religion enough to act on it.
But the rest need to get told, as often as possible, to pound sand.
(BTW, h/t to Jeff Bezos. The WP printed the winning cartoon, which puts the lie to the whole "hurting people" load of offal.)
Jeff Guinn at May 8, 2015 2:05 PM
Leave a comment