I did snort at this one.

http://cnnphilippines.com/world/2015/06/06/air-force-intel-uses-isis-moron-post-to-track-fighters.html

Randomly surfing on a Saturday, I came across this "Ask Amy" column. Two women and a man kill a bottle of scotch and wind up having a threesome. Amy's conclusion: it's the guy's fault, he's likely a rapist, because the women were drunk.

Um...really? I mean, from the description, he was just as drunk as they were. Is he the potential rapist only because he's the only one who doesn't regret the experience?

per ard's post: It probably seemed like a REALLY good idea at the time (and obviously still so the next morning).

I feel sorry for the husband and not the two ladies (making assumptions here) 'cause it is a husband's best dream at some point during a marriage.

I mean what could go wrong if they both are agreeing and participating? Ha Ha Ha

"The cover sheet of the leaked TiSA documents records that the text of the deal should not be de-classified until five years after negotiations are closed and the regulations implemented to extend the extraordinary secrecy of what the deal entails."

This seems so wrong. It's a little scary.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/06/04/mr-president-tear-down-this-wall-of-secrecy-tisa-details-emerge/

Amy Dickinson is a gender bigot.
Women withholding sex is fine, men looking at porn or getting some when their wives havent put out for a decade are cheating scum

Even when women are the cheaters writing in and there is no way to blame a man she's far kinder in her condemnation of women

"I mean what could go wrong if they both are agreeing and participating?"

The postmodern feminist would probably say that the act was inherently degrading and that no woman in her right mind would ever consent to it, so the man is a rapist regardless of the circumstances.