Doubt this will hit a nerve because to me it is contrary to MSM and liberal/socialism reports and I predict it will be an analysis considered racist/symbolic of white supremacy.

from July's The Atlantic, "Closing Europe's Harbors":

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/07/closing-european-harbors/395321/

"The current migrants, however, are overwhelmingly working-age males."

"Now Europe is learning that today’s refugees are at high risk of becoming tomorrow’s high-school dropouts, tomorrow’s unemployed, and tomorrow’s criminals."

"Immigrants from non-EU countries are twice as likely as natives to drop out of secondary school.

Those of working age are twice as likely to be unemployed.

Immigrants are also hugely overrepresented in the prisons of France, Britain, Belgium, and other European countries."

"Immigrants’ economic frustration and ensuing social isolation has in turn fostered political radicalization and violent extremism.

Extremist views are held by a minority of immigrants, but that minority poses Europe’s severest internal security threat since World War II. "

Gonna get ugly here and abroad because hard facts are not pretty and it's easier to say "I do not know what the answer but it is not ..."

College declares Haymarket Riot reference a violent threat to college president.

Panties bunched: ✔

Per Bob's linkie:

I wonder how soon the Usual Suspects will realize that they have an opportunity to smuggle themselves into Europe. Well, maybe not themselves if they're on a watch list of one sort or other, but new members who haven't been spotted just yet.

Actually, let's take a step back: how soon will the bombs be exploding. I don't think these guys will be on the attack, they'll be building IEDs and recruiting others to do the actual business of bombing and attacking.

Of course, all they need to do is wait a decade or two, and one fine morning the Euros will wake up to a plebiscite installing sharia as the new law of the land.

My thoughts are that this is being promoted here at home by ???? using the MSM, paid protestors, and, by purpose or inattention (not sure which) the AARP.

MSM no longer fact checks, anchors "misspeak" w/o firing, and willing allows/gives minor opinions (America is racist, America is white supremacy, Rioters are not "thugs") major air time.

Said air time validates these opinions w/in inner city areas where young men no longer can find ways to validate their existence other than being angry at something/somebody.

Who? Not them. Not the schools that pushed them out w/o being able to read/write w/no trade skills. Not the AARP/Al Sharptons (they are brothers one and all) and the money is too good.

Who? Must be those that say get an education, get a job skill, don't treat the 14 year old girls like Hos', get a life ...

Who? THE MAN! that's who. Racist white bastard son of a bitch. He's keeping me down. Everybody says so.

Obama wants your doctor to discuss global warming with you. As if s/he didn't already enough on their plates...

Not the schools that pushed them out w/o being able to read/write w/no trade skills.

While it is true the schools tend to do exactly that, they'd be much less successful at it if there wasn't a prevailing attitude that getting educated was a "white thing" and if you are trying to get educated, you're trying to be "white".

Matt Ridley opines on the damage that the climate wars are doing to science:

But the commentators ignore all these caveats and babble on about warming of “up to” four degrees (or even more), then castigate as a “denier” anybody who says, as I do, the lower end of the scale looks much more likely given the actual data. This is a deliberate tactic. Following what the psychologist Philip Tetlock called the “psychology of taboo”, there has been a systematic and thorough campaign to rule out the middle ground as heretical: not just wrong, but mistaken, immoral and beyond the pale. That’s what the word denier with its deliberate connotations of Holocaust denial is intended to do. For reasons I do not fully understand, journalists have been shamefully happy to go along with this fundamentally religious project.

Because Matt, most journalists are all to happy to regurgitate what an "expert" is telling them.