The Damaging Idiocy Of Treating Naughty Schoolkids Like Hardened Criminals
Kids lack judgment. This is why we don't let them drink or drive at 8. Or drink and drive.
Yet, in schools, kids are being treated as if they're adults, with adult judgment and the adult consequences that ensue from bad behavior.
This is ruinous for kids and just wrong.
From mimeislaw.com:
[A] student, Aliya Nigro, was suspended and faces criminal charges for throwing a baby carrot at her former teacher, Michele Crowley. The story presents the usual easy targets, like over-criminalization and the terror of zero-tolerance policies. That doesn't mean problematic conduct shouldn't be ignored, but it also doesn't mean they deserve the middle school death penalty.Pranks now land kids in court. Rigid disciplinary policies result in prosecution for kids so young they may not be sure what court is and still think cops are their friends. But there is a more complicated question running through stories like this - who is responsible for the mindless way we treat children these days? How did we reach this point?
The Virginia girl who hit a teacher with a carrot did something pretty stupid. Long before zero tolerance, most kids knew that throwing something at your teacher, whether a spitball or a vegetable, was not going to turn out very well. It was a bad decision. It shouldn't work out well. There should be consequences. But at that age, a child needs to be handled in a manner that makes some logical sense. And that is where the responsibility for these children becomes a concern.
...She is in a state where the Court of Appeals upheld a conviction for assault on a police officer for pointing a finger at a cop and saying "pow."
Richmond lawyer, Todd Stone, quoted in a few of the articles, makes some good puns about the carrot. But at the end of the day, nobody should be laughing this one off. The letter from the Department of Juvenile Justice, while generously noting the student is innocent until proven guilty, also claims there is substantial evidence she has committed a crime.
At what point should a grown up have stepped in and said, "Wait, this is a kid - maybe we should make sure the punishment fits the ... prank?" An apology, an explanation for her actions, or anything that would have set the lesson that she needs to stop and think before she acts, would have been not only appropriate, but highly valuable to a student preparing for her future.
Surely kids should be held accountable for reckless decisions and impulsive judgment calls. But we know harsh discipline does not work. A recent UCLA study found that frequent suspensions for minor offenses harms education. High suspension rates do not help school conditions. Arresting kids for common school offenses like fighting, vandalism, and other stupid pranks takes them out of the system that should be best equipped to deal with them and puts them in a system that is particularly bad at dealing with both minor offenders and young offenders.








Eh. You commit misdemeanor battery, there should be some consequences for it. In four years, this will bag her a criminal record.
I R A Darth Aggie at October 30, 2015 8:32 AM
We're all responsible for this. People get sued and fired these days for making decisions about how to handle an unruly kid (no matter what the decision is), so in the interest of "fairness" we've taken away their decision-making powers in favor of one-size-fits all policies. The teacher has no discretion. The school has no discretion. The only people who can stop this kind of crap are the parents.
When I was a kid, if I did something wrong in school and got punished, I'd also get punished at home. The message was very clear. You don't do that stuff. Now, parents will defend anything their kid does.
There's a talk radio guy in Atlanta, who had a story about how he saw some kid driving like a maniac, endangering himself and the people around him. There had recently been a few traffic deaths involving teenagers, so he followed the kid back to his house, went up, rang the doorbell, and told the kid's father what the kid had been doing.
The father went ballistic. Not at the kid - at the radio guy. How dare you follow my son, etc, etc. Threatened to sue the radio guy (who's also a lawyer, so he knew the father didn't have grounds to sue or anything).
My ex-wife was, for a time, an academic advisor at a university. She constantly had parents calling her to complain about the grades their kids got. Because, I guess, it's the professor's fault, not the kid's.
People these days think their kids can't do anything wrong, and if you imply they have done something wrong, you get sued. Or the parents make enough of a stink to get you fired. We've made the stakes so high that to use your own judgement is to risk your life and livelihood.
Farmer Joe at October 30, 2015 9:06 AM
Considering juvenile records are usually scrubbed upon reaching majority, I really have no problem with a children being charged with misdemeanor battery, if that's what they did.
I think a huge reason we have bullying in school is that we don't treat bullies for what they are: criminals. Why are crimes like battery and harassment overlooked when the offender is a juvenile? Yes, kids lack judgment, but guess what? Giving consequences for their actions teaches them judgment!
Patrick at October 30, 2015 9:27 AM
Just an addendum:
This one, I agree, is pretty stupid. This conviction is essentially punishing free speech.
But I support the carrot thing. The kid doesn't need to learn not to throw things at her teacher. She needs to learn that throwing things at anyone is dangerous. Would you still be okay with just a detention if the carrot had hit the teacher in the eye and injured her?
Patrick at October 30, 2015 9:32 AM
If I want to hear a Republican or Democrat address anything, it's the overcriminalization we now encourage throughout society.
> Yet, in schools, kids are being treated as if they're adults, with adult judgment and the adult consequences that ensue from bad behavior.
In the meantime in schools, adults are acting like children. Once again, I wonder with our glut of lawyers, where the public interest law firm that isn't suing schools for idiot zero tolerance policies is.
jerry at October 30, 2015 10:49 AM
"I think a huge reason we have bullying in school is that we don't treat bullies for what they are: criminals. Why are crimes like battery and harassment overlooked when the offender is a juvenile? Yes, kids lack judgment, but guess what? Giving consequences for their actions teaches them judgment!"
The problem we run into is: For normal people, something like this can be a life-ruining event. On the other hand, for bullies, they don't care about legal consequences. They will happily sit in detention or jail, plotting how they are going to get their revenge whenever they are released. There's only one thing that bullies understand: when the victim hits back. But we've made that illegal, even for young children. Today, if you defend yourself against a bully, you are at least as guilty as the bully is, if not more.
Cousin Dave at October 30, 2015 10:59 AM
People these days think their kids can't do anything wrong, and if you imply they have done something wrong, you get sued. Or the parents make enough of a stink to get you fired. We've made the stakes so high that to use your own judgement is to risk your life and livelihood.
Yep, yep, yep.
And I agree with Cousin Dave that the "no-fault" bully policy in many schools is a disaster. We'd never punish an adult who fought back against an assault, but that's precisely what many schools do against the victims of bullies.
Kevin at October 30, 2015 11:13 AM
I posted most of this in another thread, but it's appropriate here as well:
By not disciplining children early, we've set them on a collision course with society's control mechanism, the police.
We've criminalized social misbehavior. We've thrown up our hands at dealing with our own children and neighbors and decided to let the police handle it.
We're using the police to do social work. They're not equipped or trained for that. Policing is socially-sanctioned controlled violence.
People with psychological issues (even temporary ones) are not inclined to follow orders, sometimes not able to. As long as they don't represent a danger to themselves or others, there should be non-violent ways of dealing with it.
The police are like nuclear weapons. Their presence on our side keeps the other side from going too far, but once they're put into use, it means the smelly brown goo has hit the whirling cantilevered surface.
Conan the Grammarian at October 30, 2015 11:37 AM
"The police are like nuclear weapons. "
Except nukes don't go off when they encounter a minor annoyance they're too immature or poorly-trained to handle.
Gog_Magog_Carpet_Reclaimers at October 30, 2015 11:47 AM
Can't paddle 'em, 'cuz that's demeaning.
But we can call police and lock them up.
This is the natural order in a society that insists that "someone else!" handle any problem. And everything is a problem.
Radwaste at October 30, 2015 11:52 AM
Nor do most police officers "go off."
Conan the Grammarian at October 30, 2015 12:20 PM
"Except nukes don't go off when they encounter a minor annoyance they're too immature or poorly-trained to handle."
Umm. Yes they do Gog. When nukes encounter anything that sets them off they go boom.
Ben at October 30, 2015 1:16 PM
Therein lies the problem.
A generation or two ago, Aliya NIgro's behavior would have been the whole iceberg.
Now it is merely the tip.
And we probably got from there to here by not responding with the severity that sort of thing really deserved.
Jeff Guinn at October 30, 2015 1:46 PM
My friend's daughter is in middle school. She has been bullied for two years now by the same girl. Despite multiple meetings and conferences with teachers and administrators nothing has been done and the bullying has escalated. Finally reaching the breaking point, my friend told her daughter that it was okay for her to defend herself, that she didn't need to keep being a victim for fear of punishment. The bully came after her again a few days ago, shoving her around, hitting her, and trying to take her backpack. Well, she fought back and took her down, and the bully's friend that stepped in to help. They are still sorting out the mess, but so far it appears the bully is not likely to be in any trouble but my friend's daughter is.......for defending herself against an assault. Lawyers and police are involved and all three are on an indefinite suspension pending a police investigation. The girls are 14 years old.
I have another acquaintance whose son was given a three week suspension from high school for mooning someone.......from his own yard at home, on a weekend, not at all during school hours. Apparently a neighbor saw it and called the school to complain. WTF happened to complaining to the parents? It didn't happen on school property let alone during school hours so I fail to see why the school should have had any involvement at all, even if they did get a call.
Public schools are staffed by brainless idiots writing idiotic rules so no one has to think. They are probably also those on a power trip and enjoy bullying others.
BunnyGirl at October 30, 2015 5:57 PM
Bunnygirl: "WTF happened to complaining to the parents?"
Sorry, I wouldn't even try to talk to the parents, unless I knew them very well, for I don't know how they would react. They might very well blame me for something that their kid did.
I could just see some kid mooning an adult, the adult complains to the parents; and then, wham! that adult is now a suspect in a peeping tom case.
charles at October 30, 2015 6:52 PM
Kevin: "We'd never punish an adult who fought back against an assault, but that's precisely what many schools do against the victims of bullies."
I think there are a lot of school administrators and teachers who can't discern the moral difference between aggressive, violent bullying and self defense. They literally aren't able to tell right from wrong.
Ken R at October 30, 2015 10:25 PM
Kevin: "We'd never punish an adult who fought back against an assault, but that's precisely what many schools do against the victims of bullies."
I think there are a lot of school administrators and teachers who can't discern the moral difference between aggressive, violent bullying and self defense. They literally aren't able to tell right from wrong.
Posted by: Ken R at October 30, 2015 10:25 PM
It took me years to figure out that half or more of the human race is actually this stupid.
Depressing isn't it?
And our educational system has been designed to insure, that these sheep get their credentials so they can go on to indoctrinate another generation of idiots.
Look at the gender studies professor and her Obama placemats, who apparently doesn't even know that Obama can not single handedly ban guns.
Isab at October 31, 2015 6:26 AM
It is simpler than that Ken. When the bully was acting out they didn't have a problem, the bully's victims did. Once the bully is stopped then they have a problem that they have to solve. Easy solution, if there are no victims willing to stand up for themselves then the administration has no problem.
The bureaucracy works to protect itself, period.
Ben at October 31, 2015 6:27 AM
"When nukes encounter anything that sets them off they go boom."
So Ben believes cops are allowed to be set off by anything they feel is bothering them.
Good to know, Ben. We'll put you on the "Government agents uber alles" list. Perhaps Obama can give you a "Faithful and Compliant Citizen" award or something.
Gog_Magog_Carpet_Reclaimers at October 31, 2015 9:09 AM
Nice try at misinterpretation Gog. I believe that once a nuke is triggered it goes boom. That is what all bombs do. I will admit you are sometimes right. Bombs don't always go off when triggered. Those are called duds.
I'm not sure what you were talking about when you brought up training. Even our 'smart bombs' aren't that smart.
Ben at November 1, 2015 6:59 AM
Wait, grammar school kids get police instead of school discipline for their misbehavior but university students are not allowed to take rape accusations to the police?
Alan at November 3, 2015 11:54 AM
Leave a comment