Who's Threatening Black Students?
Um, another black student, at least in this case.
And it crossed my mind about the Harvard case (of black tape put over black professors' framed photos.)
In a NYT piece about that, black Harvard Law school prof Randall Kennedy writes:
The identity and motives of the person or people behind the taping have not been determined. Perhaps the defacer is part of the law school community. But maybe not. Perhaps the defacer is white. But maybe not. Perhaps the taping is meant to convey anti-black contempt or hatred for the African-American professors. But maybe it was meant to protest the perceived marginalization of black professors, or was a hoax meant to look like a racial insult in order to provoke a crisis, or was a rebuke to those who have recently been taping over the law school's seal, which memorializes a family of slaveholders from colonial times. Some observers, bristling with certainty, insist that the message conveyed by the taping of the photographs is obvious. To me it is puzzling.Assuming that it was a racist gesture, there is a need to calibrate carefully its significance. On a campus containing thousands of students, faculty members and staff, one should not be surprised or unglued by an instance or even a number of instances of racism.
...Disturbing, too, is a ... tendency to indulge in self-diminishment by displaying an excessive vulnerability to perceived and actual slights and insults. Some activists seem to have learned that invoking the rhetoric of trauma is an effective way of hooking into the consciences of solicitous authorities. Perhaps it is useful for purposes of eliciting certain short-term gains.
In the long run, though, reformers harm themselves by nurturing an inflated sense of victimization. A colleague of mine whose portrait was taped over exhibited the right spirit when he jauntily declared that it would take far more than tape to slow him down.








It's probably a good idea to consider the possibility of any so-called "hate crime" to be a hoax unless proven otherwise; there's been so many of these hoaxes that a website, fakehatecrimes.org, has been started to keep track of all them. 213 as of most recent count.
Robert Evans at December 2, 2015 11:44 PM
NYTimes authors get paid by the pound, right? Talk about a blah blah blah word salad.
Ben at December 3, 2015 5:37 AM
"In the long run, though, reformers harm themselves by nurturing an inflated sense of victimization. "
I disagree. Far from harming themselves, they are rewarded handsomely, in money, power and prestige. They harm the people that they claim to be representing. But that's a different thing.
Cousin Dave at December 3, 2015 7:20 AM
I'd say Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson have done quite well.
Bob in Texas at December 3, 2015 8:35 AM
Here's a bleg from the NYTimes op-ed editor, about 2 years old. Pull quote (emphasis mine):
On the other hand, he can cite it in his CV or list of publications, which looks good.
I R A Darth Aggie at December 3, 2015 11:32 AM
Upside is these special snowflakes, these crybullies, put it on the web. Sort of a heads-up for future employers.
Richard Aubrey at December 3, 2015 1:42 PM
Leave a comment