The State Is A Bully: Ugly Public Prying Into Private Giving
Jon Riches of the Goldwater Institute writes in the Sac Bee that California Attorney General Kamala Harris now wants to know who donated to what organization, what their address is, and how much they gave:
Several weeks ago, the organization for which I work, the Goldwater Institute, received a demand from Harris' office to turn over a copy of private tax information that includes the names and addresses of our contributors. Although this information is protected from disclosure under both the First Amendment and federal tax law, refusing to comply with this demand would presumably result in our organization losing its ability to solicit new members in California.Harris' demands are part of a broader national effort to force private nonprofit organizations that want to engage in political dialogue to turn their donors' names, addresses and contribution amounts over to the government. Couched as "transparency" measures, these mandates are actually a concerted effort to stifle speech with which disclosure advocates disagree.
Privacy rights are integral to a free society. Riches explains why:
Private giving also prevents retaliation against speakers by those who disagree, particularly when speaking truth to power. From the 1960s civil rights era to today's most contentious debates, groups have sought the identities of opponents to threaten, harass and intimidate them into silence. Privacy has been essential for unfettered dialogue in politics, literature, the arts and journalism, among many other fields.That's why the Constitution prevents these types of government intrusions.
...Harris claims a law enforcement purpose in collecting the names and addresses of donors, but this justification is no more persuasive than the National Security Agency's bulk collection of Americans' phone records without lawful authority. As the state's chief law enforcement officer, Harris should know that court warrants are required, lest we all fall within their dragnet.
Every American has the right to support the causes we believe in without the fear of harassment and retaliation. Disclosure mandates undermine this basic freedom, dry up donations to charities and silence political speech.








Screw her. She's just the AG. She can be troublesome, but if we stick together she'll have to back down.
Canvasback at January 1, 2016 10:58 PM
She has already accomplished her goal. Just the threat will deter a large number of donors.
People are aware of the John Doe witch hunts in Wisconsin. The harassment of individuals that contributed to the anti gay marriage ballot initiative.
We have to be honest that we are a constitutional republic in name only. We are in the early stages of becoming a banana republic. Californi is already ahead of the process by being a one party state run by progressives.
Bill O Rights at January 2, 2016 1:09 AM
Bill O Rights is exactly right. There is a near constant dribble away of our rights and few people seem to notice or care.
Amy Alkon at January 2, 2016 5:05 AM
Amy, I would go a step further, I would say an alarming number of people actually approve. Unfortunately, because they don't learn real history in our schools, and never experienced totalitarianism, they don't realize what it means.
They also suffer from the erroneous belief that govt is super efficient and incorruptible.
Bill O Rights at January 2, 2016 6:40 AM
"They also suffer from the erroneous belief that govt is super efficient and incorruptible."
In other words, they can't read and have never been to the DMV.
MarkD at January 2, 2016 6:58 AM
Bill O Rights; yep, I agree. Just use either of those two magic phrases - "law enforcement purpose" or "it's for the children" - and folks readily accept it.
charles at January 2, 2016 11:24 AM
If this totalitarian bitch gets her way, the Republic is dead, at least in Kalifornia.
mpetrie98 at January 2, 2016 12:56 PM
imagine what kind of database you could construct by linking the political contribution data with the leaked nationwide database of voter registration...
"I'm being audited? What'd I do?"
:IRS agent offhandedly scrolls through the databse, that says how you voted, who you give to, where you drive your car, and how often you buy ice cream at the store...:
SwissArmyD at January 2, 2016 2:20 PM
"In other words, they can't read and have never been to the DMV."
Why should they? They have parents to do those things for them! (Okay, low blow, admittedly...)
IRS agent offhandedly scrolls through the databse, that says how you voted, who you give to, where you drive your car, and how often you buy ice cream at the store...:
"Oh, I see the license plate scanners observed your car at the adult book store last week. It would be a shame if your wife found out about that."
Cousin Dave at January 4, 2016 8:37 AM
Leave a comment