Must two married college students verbally consent to each other?

Only if they're not married to each other. Getting married in college is stupid anyway.

Idiotic.

PS As regulars here probably know, three hours after meeting me, my boyfriend walked me to my car, grabbed me and kissed me -- which is why he's my boyfriend, and not just "some cute guy I once talked to at the Apple computer store."

So, can I just get the woman to sign a blank paper? I mean, I can fill in the details later, right?

The French have a word for this (of course!): carte blanche. Of course, one could ask the fictionalized Cardinal Richelieu how that worked out for his agent, Milady de Winter.

At least she didn't lose her head while giving head. Wut?

Oh, I R A -- these documents can be overturned.

Sex with a prostitute will soon become the only form of "safe sex."

So, what, I need to get it notarized?

Signed consent forms for video taping of the encounter?

I doubt that prostitutes will be exempt from the law, tho what happens there is more plainly discussed.

> Signed consent forms for video taping of the encounter?

Apparently colleges are making the video taping grounds for expulsion.

So:

1. You get falsely accused of rape at college

2. You say, no, it was consensual I have the videotape to prove it

3. You still end up kicked out of college, because you taped the encounter.

The law is being used to weaponize regret. The majority of sex in the above scenarios will never be prosecuted. But now if a woman feels regret the next day she has the power to ruin a man's(or another woman's)life. And this is called progress...

Some of my most romantic memories involve the guy just grabbing me and kissing me out of nowhere. Sad girls growing up now may never know that feeling.

This is scary stuff, and not likely going to get better before it gets worse. If it keeps going, foreign invaders may just need to waltz in and say "well, you didn't get me to sign a consent form it was ok to counter-attack, we're going to sue."

*scribbles on hand* "...Ask me if you can kiss me and the answer becomes no." ;)

"Sex with a prostitute will soon become the only form of "safe sex.""

Only until the SEIU organizes them.

These kinds of laws are made by people who are scared of life.

Life comes with risks, offenses, and unpleasantness - along with rewards, affirmation, and pleasure.

Yes, there are stalkers and creeps out there, and we must guard our most defenseless citizens against them. However, there are also myriad stories about guys who didn't take no for an answer (my grandfather included) who persisted and got the girl, much to her eventual delight.

"Ask me if you can kiss me and the answer becomes no."
It isn't just you, it is pretty universal. Many women also need some alcohol or total darkness to reduce their inhibitions. Any alcohol on a campus = assault and in total darkness you can't even look for facial expressions.
These laws violate basic human nature. The problem is that girls who don't know what they want and are insecure are trying to act like boys and having hookup culture, which they really don't want, so they have regrets, especially if he doesn't call again.

...especially if he doesn't call again. ~ Posted by: Craig Loehle at February 3, 2016 11:06 AM

No woman wants to think she was just another notch on a bedpost or the fodder of locker room braggadocio - even if she went in with a hookup as an objective.

Now, she thinks she has a weapon with which to get even.

To protect your autonomy, we will micro-manage all aspects of your sexual interactions and mandate how those interactions are carried out.

-Jut

"But there is a larger problem at stake in Bill 967. It is an argument of definition: A failure to procure "affirmative agreement" means that sexual assault has taken place."

There's an even bigger one than that. Can a woman be charged for any sexual initiative she makes under this law, and if not, why not?

"But there is a larger problem at stake in Bill 967. It is an argument of definition: A failure to procure "affirmative agreement" means that sexual assault has taken place."

There's an even bigger one than that. Can a woman be charged for any sexual initiative she makes under this law, and if not, why not?

"Insisting on absolute safety is for people who don't have the balls to live in the real world."

There's an even bigger one than that. Can a woman be charged for any sexual initiative she makes under this law, and if not, why not?

Don't be silly. Of course not.

She doesn't have penis.

Progressives - People who are consumed with the thought that some where, some one is having fun, and are determined to make damn sure that a stop is put to it.

> Progressives - People who are consumed with the thought that

Agreed, but where are the Republicans who oppose this?

"Agreed, but where are the Republicans who oppose this?"

In California?

Under "affirmative consent" rules on campus rules, each sexual act must be preceded by a request for consent.

Or dinner and a movie.

As a college woman who actually liked sex this would have totally ruined it for me. Of course understood that it was still my decision to allow someone to seduce me.

Yup, raped my wife this morning, and look forward to the next chance to do some more rapin'. Rape, rape, rape, rape, rape, rape ... how good it is! (I especially like when she rapes me, over and over again!)

My God, this makes women absolutely ridiculous creatures. And they insist on respect? Not likely.