Japan Women's Institute of Contemporary Media Culture posts official English translation of their reply to the U.N.

http://wmc-jpn.blogspot.com/2016/03/in-english.html?spref=tw

Some context? For a little while, feminists have been trying to use the U.N. to force Japan to criminalize drawn porn, because according to the perpetually offended, "female doodles" deserve the same rights as the fleshy ones.

Well, Japanese women are having none of it.

TSA-promoting gibberish from American Federation of Govt Employees - another great Chris Gray TSANewsBlog post

http://tsanewsblog.com/16538/news/false-premise-theater/

Great, Sixclaws -- from that link:

Would a prohibition of the sale of video games and manga that depict sexual violence help bring about more respect for women's rights in Japan? Our answer to this question is a resounding "No".

Forgot this bit -- the "fictional character" point:

[Reasons behind our opinion]

[Reason 1]
Fictional sexual violence in manga and video games does not actually violate people’s human rights, so prohibiting these media in order to preserve women's rights would be meaningless.

"to criminalize drawn porn,"

"...The sex instinct will be eradicated. Procreation will be an annual formality like the renewal of a ration card. We shall abolish the orgasm. Our neurologists are at work upon it now. There will be no loyalty, except loyalty towards the Party. There will be no love, except the love of Big Brother." -- 1984

Smrat Diplomacy strikes again!

The fallout from President Obama’s indiscreet remarks in Jeffrey Goldberg’s landmark Atlantic article has begun. One day after the article dropped, reports of the President dissing major world leaders and close allies fill the London papers, which highlight Obama’s belittling of David Cameron. The Times of London‘s headline blares, “Obama Lays Blame for Libya Mess on Cameron,”

http://www.the-american-interest.com/2016/03/11/it-begins/

Maybe Hillary can campaign on "reset" button?

"For a little while, feminists have been trying to use the U.N. to force Japan to criminalize drawn porn, because according to the perpetually offended, "female doodles" deserve the same rights as the fleshy ones."

Why do we criminalize the possession of a picture?

It isn't anything more than endorsement of the Thought Police, inferring that the picture signals that a sexually-based crime has already been committed.

The only difference between anime/manga characters and this character is the level of detail; that character is not real.

If you purchase a product from realdoll.com, is there a minimum apparent age below which silicone rubber is incapable of consent?

@Radwaste,

It's all about the projection. Methinks they're busy against shota artwork because it gets in the way of their search for RL pictures.

They're not doing it to save the children, they're doing it to save the children for themselves.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/2549/un-one-worst-organizations-planet-heres-more-proof-joshua-yasmeh

Lo, and behold, the never ending quest to find misogyny on ANYTHING never ends:

http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/03/in-vitro-is-chauvinist-the-sex-ratio-of-ivf-babies-is-skewed-towards-males/