There's A Reason We Call Them "Children" -- Not "Short Adults"
In 3rd Grade, I battered a classmate. Okay, that's what they would have called it -- "battery" -- if I had been arrested. (If that had happened, I'd probably still be in tears.)
What I actually did is bonk a classmate on the head with a dustpan. We were supposed to sweep up and she wasn't sleeping. BONK!
I got in trouble, which is to say I got sent to the principal's office and my mom got called.
I was made to understand the error of my ways (simply being sent principal-ward did that) and I apologized.
And that was the extent of my criminal past -- well, to be honest, save for a little minor fake ID and permission slip forgery in my teens. But I've kept my freckled nose clean since then.
It helped that schools didn't go overboard then -- having kids arrested for stuff that should be corrected with a stern talking to and a call to a kid's parents.
Robby Soave writes at Reason that because some jerk of a mom demanded a girl be arrested -- for, at 12, pinching her son's butt -- the school and cops complied:
Breana's actions were wrong. She should not have violated that boy's personal space. It was appropriate for the school to tell her to keep her hands to herself, and even to give her some light punishment. But a suspension seems a tad overboard, unless the boy was deeply humiliated or scarred. Nothing in the story suggests that this was the case.Part of growing up is learning to respect other people's boundaries, and schools should play a role in instructing kids to behave like adults.
The police, on the other hand, have no role to play in the lives of non-violent, non-troubled kids who are making typical kid mistakes. It is ludicrous to charge Breana with a crime. She's not a criminal, she's a normal pre-teen. Kids push each other around. They mess with each other. Police should interfere only when such conduct is actually threatening. A kid who repeatedly punches another kid might deserve a visit to juvenile detention. A kid who pinches another kid deserves a time-out.
But given the new obsession with child safety, and paranoia about sex crimes, I'm actually a bit surprised Breana hasn't also been charged with sexual harassment. If Breanna were a boy and the victim a girl, perhaps the authorities would have imposed a harsher sentence. (A 13-year-old boy in Maryland who kissed a 14-year-old girl on a dare was charged with second-degree assault.)
"Lord, lord, lord, what's this world come to?" asked Breana's father. "Kid can't even be a kid."
And that's exactly the problem. When we expect perfect behavior from children, we set them up for failure. If they're not allowed to make mistakes, then they're not allowed to grow up. Putting a kid in jail for a one-off physical encounter is cruel, it's unnecessary, and it betrays a profound naivety about the social development of young people.
Oh, and you want to do right by your kid? Don't have him be the reason some other kid gets arrested for what amounts to normal asshole kid behavior.
P.S. I say that as someone who was bullied as a kid. Even then, my dad went to the principal of my junior high school and said the behavior had to stop; and it was stopped. He didn't demand all the girls be packed off to jail.
(One of these girls later wrote to me and apologized, which I appreciated.)








that because some jerk of a mom demanded a girl be arrested -- for, at 12, pinching her son's butt -- the school and cops complied
Ordinarily, I would agree with you on this. BUT...this foolishness will continue until women/girls feel the burden. This is classic punch back twice as hard.
Besides, 6 weeks from now the girl could have claimed he was the malefactor and demanded official retribution.
Unlike that poor sod from UMass-Amherst who was sexually assaulted by a woman when he was blind drunk and she gave him a hummer. The poor sod who was expelled because he was judged to be in the wrong.
Shoe. Foot. Other. Some assembly required.
I R A Darth Aggie at March 25, 2016 6:33 AM
I was reminded of this today: if you really want a bad law/precedent overturned, you must enforce it on all with as much zeal as you can possibly muster.
When all feel the pain and see the stupidity that caused that pain, the stupidity will stop much more quickly than if the mechanism is used to punish only the unfavored class(es).
I R A Darth Aggie at March 25, 2016 6:38 AM
Don't see a way around assholes being assholes.
Hope teachers use this as a 'teaching moment' on several levels.
Bob in Texas at March 25, 2016 6:41 AM
Yes, the magnitude of punishment is ridiculous. The problem is, as I R A Darth Aggie implies, is the fact that it wouldn't seem so ridiculous if the roles were reversed.
Third wave feminists would want this guy's head on a pikestaff. (And most of them probably still do, since obviously he must be at fault in some way if she pinched him.)
Patrick at March 25, 2016 6:56 AM
I will wager good cash money American that the boy is being raised by his mother only.
Poor kid - he will forever be known as 'that little punk whose mommy called the cops because he got his butt pinched'. The therapy bills alone will be awesome. Can't she see what effect her actions will have on her kid? I guess she can't.
Although the process and suggested punishment is wildly, insanely disproportionate, and the prosecutor who allowed this to go forward, along with the school administrators who let it get that far, need their heads examined. However, there is a really good lesson here for the hundreds of students to know about this first-hand, namely, that 'equality' is a two-edged sword and that the state and its minions are a) stupid and b) very-likely to screw up your life, given half a chance. If it makes them despise their temporary jailers, that's a good thing.
llater,
llamas
llamas at March 25, 2016 7:07 AM
"...cash money..."
Redundant.
Patrick at March 25, 2016 7:14 AM
" . . good cash money . . ."
It's a quote. From 'True Grit'. The real one.
llater,
llamas
llamas at March 25, 2016 7:18 AM
Let me paint an alternative universe.
Girl pinches boy. Boy pinches back. They have fun. Boy grows tired of girl, stops pinching back. Girl gets angry at boy, accuses him of holding her down and pinching her. Starts carrying a mattress at school to bring attention to her plight, as well as the school's lack of discipline.
Girl gets invited to White House for a summit on the War on Women. Boy is eventually cleared of the charges, but the Internet remembers all, his reputation is trashed and he is forced to change his name and move to another state.
Sounds ludicrous, right? like it should be a plot for a short story from a dystopian reality?
I R A Darth Aggie at March 25, 2016 7:23 AM
I prefer good hard yankee dollars, myself.
Tho I hear this "bitcoin" is a thing. Since we're quoting movies, fuck me gently with a chainsaw.
I R A Darth Aggie at March 25, 2016 7:25 AM
I'm a gal. When I was in 6th grade,I was at my locker getting books when a boy pinched my posterior.
I was really upset and went to the Principal. The thing that upset me was, without growing eyes in the back of my head, I felt vulnerable by going to my locker after that.
The boy, I believe, got a stern talking-to.
I felt better, but not 100%. I wanted his head on a plate (at the time), but knew it wasn't reasonable.
But he also didn't do it again.
I learned that you can't rely upon people being good/nice and paying attention to one's surroundings is really important.
So while it still gives me that crawly feeling in the back of my neck (did I mention how unsavory this guy was?), I actually think it ended up being a net positive. I got to practice standing up for myself and learned a tiny bit about life.
Shannon at March 25, 2016 7:58 AM
Shannon:
And of equal importance, this young man hopefully learned a valuable lesson about keeping his hands to himself. Had you not asserted yourself, Shannon, this creepy individual would undoubtedly go on to do it again to someone else, making his habit that much more intractable.
Patrick at March 25, 2016 9:27 AM
A couple weeks ago some woman tried to have my 3-year-old arrested for assault for something that happened at preschool. Her son was restraining mine and pulling his hair so my son pushed him and the kid fell down the slide. No injuries. The mother insists her son is "special needs" and can't understand or control his behavior so it's not his fault that he's been bullying my kid (and a couple others) since he started there. Yeah, okay, whatever lady. I'm still shocked that she thought she could have a 3-year-old arrested. To his credit, the cop that showed up laughed at her and told her she was out of her effing mind.
BunnyGirl at March 25, 2016 9:31 AM
Interesting, BunnyGirl. So, if you're assaulted by a "special needs" (a problem that seems to be epidemic these days) child, you no longer have the option of defending yourself. So, you're only recourse is to run away, or, if that's not possible, you must simply endure. But defending yourself gets you charged with "assault."
So, if I get attacked by a severely mentally retarded adult, my only recourse, if I can't run away, is simply to allow myself to be hurt.
By the way, this "special needs" child's mother doesn't seem to know what assault is. Pushing someone down a slide is battery not assault. Assault is the threat of violence; battery is any contact with a person or the person's effects that a reasonable person would consider offensive.
Patrick at March 25, 2016 10:32 AM
A couple weeks ago some woman tried to have my 3-year-old arrested for assault for something that happened at preschool.
UNBELIEVABLE! 3-year-old in jail?
If her "special needs" child is unable to understand or control his behavior, perhaps he needs some help before he's mainstreamed.
Thank goodness the cop laughed.
As we see from this story, not all do.
Amy Alkon at March 25, 2016 11:40 AM
Amy Alkon: If her "special needs" child is unable to understand or control his behavior, perhaps he needs some help before he's mainstreamed.
And it seems, based on his mother's judgment, that he inherited his "special needs" from her.
Patrick at March 25, 2016 12:19 PM
I'm generally on the same page as everyone here, but it's important to remember that 2 or more people can hold defensible, but diverging, viewpoints. Sometime's shit's gonna happen, best just to be prepared.
Case in point: a few years ago that kid in Australia snapped and beat the crap out of the much smaller kid who had been tormenting him. IMHO, the smaller kid deserved to get his ass kicked. Problem was, the kid who snapped was much bigger, was characterized as a "good kid" and was extremely lucky that he didn't seriously injure or kill the punk. What he did might have brought him and a whole bunch of us some warm fuzzies, but that wouldn't matter a bit if he wound up with a criminal conviction.
DaveG at March 25, 2016 12:58 PM
Typo: We were supposed to sweep up and she wasn't sleeping.
EarlWer at March 28, 2016 10:00 AM
Leave a comment