Crimes Against Feelings At The University Of New Hampshire
University of New Hampshire has published a "Bias-Free Language Guide." A sampling from its contents:
Forms of Aggression
Micro-assault, verbal attack.
- Example: "Why do you need a wheelchair? I saw you walk... You can walk, right?" to a person who is using a mobile chair for long-distance travel.
- Example: "Dogs smell funny" to a blind person using a guide dog.
Micro-insult, a form of verbal or silent demeaning through insensitive comments or behavior.
- Example: A person exhibits a stubborn, begrudging attitude, that they will accommodate an accessibility request. The verbalization is appropriate but the tone seems insulting.
Micro-invalidation, degrading a person's wholeness through making false assumptions about the other's ability, causing a sense of invalidation.
- Example: "You have a learning disability? How can you be a lawyer?" to a person with a learning disability.
- Example: "The new international student is having language challenges." (More appropriately, we would say that the new international student is concentrating on learning a new language.)
Okay, let's take on one of these -- asking a person in a wheelchair about what the deal is, for one.
No, let's not do that -- let's not engage with the person in the wheelchair; much better to do what many people do -- just look right through them.
The late quadriplegic cartoonist John Callahan was a friend of mine, and with his extremely un-PC cartoons, tried to show that people in wheelchairs are people -- meaning you can joke about them (not to mention ask them questions about themselves), same as other people.
Here's a bit about Callahan from an advice column I wrote, responding to a letter from a guy with a disability -- some kind of shaking disorder:
Your tremors, however, become public the moment you walk into a place to meet a woman -- which is actually the perfect time to make a crack like, "Is it freezing[ "Don't worry; I only shake like this on first dates...and every day since I was born."] in here, or do I have a muscular disorder?" Maybe while wearing a T-shirt with "That's my groove thing I'm shaking."How dare I joke about a disability?! Truth be told, I can't really take credit for this approach. I call it "The Callahan," after my late quadriplegic cartoonist friend, John Callahan, who buzzed around Portland in a motorized wheelchair, cracking jokes like, "See my new shoes? I hear they're very comfortable."
Callahan understood that a person's disability often becomes a big wall between them and the rest of us because we're afraid of doing or saying the wrong thing. But through his refusal to, uh, pussychair around the subject, Callahan told people how the disabled want to be treated, which is "just like everyone else." And because the rest of us get poked fun of, Callahan did cartoons featuring disabled people. One of these has a posse on horseback in the desert looking down at an empty wheelchair. The posse leader reassures the others, "Don't worry, he won't get far on foot" -- which became the title of Callahan's autobiography.
Adopting a more Callahan-esque attitude -- using humor -- would allow you to set the tone for your condition to be just a fact about you instead of a fact people pity you for. And by offering to answer questions they might have, you can shrink any big scary mysteries down to a more manageable size.
Callahan also had no problem with people asking him about why he was in a chair or anything else.
This mandate about how all people in wheelchairs supposedly must be treated is infantilizes them. It also is likely to cause people to not talk to or engage with people who are disabled, out of fear that they'll commit some speech crime.
If somebody finds your question insensitive, let them be a grownup and shut you down.
Treating people like precious little victims from the get-go -- and assuming they can't speak for themselves if they're offended (or even that you're offending them by asking about something about them) -- is seriously insulting to anybody who wants to be seen as a person and not a disabled person, or a whatever person (insert color, etc., here).








Or they could be a respectful grownup and politely point out that the question was insensitive and why.
I see no reason to "shut anyone down" over what might have been (and probably was) an innocent mistake.
Patrick at April 7, 2016 6:25 AM
I find life is much easier if I ignore people. So, if I ignore you, it isn't necessarily you specifically. I just don't like people.
They're pretty awful.
And no, the irony isn't lost on me.
I R A Darth Aggie at April 7, 2016 6:57 AM
"•Example: "Why do you need a wheelchair? I saw you walk... You can walk, right?" to a person who is using a mobile chair for long-distance travel."
Considering that the SJWs would have no moral qualms about accosting someone in Wal-Mart with the same question, yeah.
Cousin Dave at April 7, 2016 7:17 AM
Or they could be a respectful grownup and politely point out that the question was insensitive and why.
Yes.
Exactly.
Connecting with people is a better way to get them to come around. I have a post about this I should get on - from something that happened the other day.
Amy Alkon at April 7, 2016 8:25 AM
"Considering that the SJWs would have no moral qualms about accosting someone in Wal-Mart with the same question, yeah. "
Republicans eat babies. I mean, I've never seen it, but I bet it's true, and if it's inside my head then it's my reality and you can't dispute it.
Gog_Magog_Carpet_Reclaimers at April 7, 2016 8:55 AM
With this logic, you can't question that someone is using a handicap parking spot when they aren't handicapped, or question that someone claims their iguana or chicken is a service animal.
This also criminalizes mere facial expressions or lack of being a wonderful, empathic human being.
And what do you do if the disadvantaged person is also a jerk--just because one is handicapped in some way that doesn't make the person an angel.
Craig Loehle at April 7, 2016 10:25 AM
Republicans eat babies. I mean, I've never seen it, but I bet it's true, and if it's inside my head then it's my reality and you can't dispute it.
I eat babies for breakfast.
Ok, so they're proto-chickens.
I R A Darth Aggie at April 7, 2016 10:51 AM
Just another SJW silencing and shaming tactic. If you are unfortunate enough to have the "privilege" of a penis and white skin, you had best just shut the f*** up, amirite?
They want to encourage "diversity" by emphasizing the "otherness" of the special groups? Sounds like diversity exists to promote divisiveness.
Jay R at April 7, 2016 12:24 PM
When I can not use "Have you tried therapy?" I'll go with "I'm sorry you think _______________ are second-tier citizens because I do not."
Going to start having fun w/deese guys.
Bob in Texas at April 7, 2016 3:50 PM
Cousin Dave: "Considering that the SJWs would have no moral qualms about accosting someone in Wal-Mart with the same question, yeah."
Yes. Whether or not an insensitive or offensive comment is inappropriate depends on who speaks it and to whom it's spoken.
Ken R at April 7, 2016 4:52 PM
"The new international student is having language challenges"
vs.
"the new international student is concentrating on learning a new language."
The first one sounds straight forward and nonjudgmental; the second one sounds sarcastic.
Ken R at April 7, 2016 4:56 PM
The Penn & Teller "Bullshit" episode on handicapped parking sums up these entitled professional victims nicely.
jdgalt at April 9, 2016 12:41 PM
"international students"
Fuck that sh&t! They are foreign students.
Just like if I went to their country (and, since I have travelled quite a bit; I may very well have) I'd be called a "foreigner" too.
The term "international" also applies to me! I'm "International." I just happen to be in my own country at the moment.
Of course, "foreign" said with a sneer is rude; but, "international" can be said with a sneer too.
Oh, and SJW is always said with a sneer.
charles at April 9, 2016 3:06 PM
Leave a comment