So the Clinton Broadcast Service edits Bill for saying Shrillary "frequently gets dehydrated" (original below):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB5mfal_qc4

...by the way, what is it now? Dehydration? Pneumonia? Parkinson?

yep, Hillary passed out - so Trump had better release HIS medical records!

Own it, Progs:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/feb/17/eugenics-skeleton-rattles-loudest-closet-left?CMP=share_btn_fb

Embracing the chaos forces us to rethink our role in the world. Stability is an outdated model. It assumes that the world is moving toward unity. Fix the trouble spots and humanity will be ready for world government. Make sure everyone follows international law and we can all hum Lennon’s “Imagine”.

Not only is this a horrible dystopian vision of the future, it’s also a silly fantasy.

The UN is nothing but a clearinghouse for dictators. International law is meaningless outside of commercial disputes. The world isn’t moving toward unity, but to disunity. If even the EU can’t hold together, the notion of the Middle East becoming the good citizens of some global government is a fairy tale told by diplomats while tucking each other into bed in five-star hotels at international conferences.

It’s time to deal with the world as it is. And to ask what our objectives are.

http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2016/09/fighting-caliphate-with-chaos.html

You go girl!

http://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/scotsol/homepage/news/7233903/Teenage-girl-18-asks-60-year-old-caretaker-of-her-former-school-to-marry-her-in-front-of-thousands-of-stunned-spectators.html

And of course, the gender-bent version of the previous link

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/real-life-stories/71-year-old-woman-marries-8426289

And in America, most people celebrate something by having a few beers.

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/09/13/islamic-state-celebrates-eid-video-prisoners-hanging-meat-hooks/

Eugenics is good enough for the plants and animals we grow for food and clothing, for our pets, our medications, why not us?

There are plenty of children who need to be adopted so why should two people with a 95% chance of generating a kid with cystic fibrosis get to have kids and foist off the cost of his care on society because they 'want' and child of 'their own'?

I recall watching one of those medical horror story programs a few years back.

This couple, both of them carried the recessive gene for Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa

Do not click on the link if you've had anything to eat in the last hour of so

https://www.google.com/search?q=Junctional+Epidermolysis+Bullosa&rlz=1C1AVNE_enUS686US686&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwin5oLP44_PAhVLRiYKHZ4-ASoQ_AUICCgB&biw=1280&bih=620

After their first child was born with the disease they were told they were carriers and they shouldnt have any more children, they had FIVE more, they said they were going to keep having kids until they had a 'normal one'

I'm sorry but people like that should be forcibly sterilized, and people who carry recessive genes to godawful illnesses should volunteer to be sterilized if their partner also carries the gene