Man with autism loves giving high fives to others on a crowded train; woman calls for feminist vigilantes to go hunt him down.

Sad. On a train, amongst many people, you are not threatened by a person who behaves in socially inappropriate ways. Why assume that they are predating on you as a woman instead of wondering whether they maybe don't have the normal social skills -- and exude kindness toward them?

A bit from the piece:

'I don't believe he singles out women in that regard either, he's done it to me before and I have told him to leave me be politely and that he did.'

'He likes getting high fives from folks, most people ignore him but at times they do give him one.'

This man was trying to get a woman to give him a high five ... he has a disability

Another person pleaded with social media users to stop calling the man a predator.
'This man was trying to get a woman to give him a high five and I know this man he has a disability,' she wrote online.

'This man is disabled... A simple reminder of personal space and friends vs strangers and he understands.'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3830176/Man-Melbourne-tram-labelled-lowlife-creep-autistic-loves-giving-strangers-high-fives.html

More on that post:

http://www.antifeminismaustralia.com/news/clementine-ford-bullies-disabled-man/

It's too early to have a stomach ulcer..

The process is the punishment:

http://thefederalist.com/2016/10/10/16-times-democrats-tried-to-prosecute-their-opponents/

I am so goddamn tired of fat people sitting next to me on airliners. You motherfuckers don't care about anyone but yourselves.

Samsung: down $17 billion over the Note 7 splodey phones:

https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/246067/

They've halted sales and production of the Note 7, and I presume they'll be providing replacement phones or refunds for those who purchased the product.

I do not understand how these carb-addled shitmills can get through their day, or even their lunch, without collapsing into a mute, quivering, lumpy mass of shame-narcosis.

Christ Fuck: How do they convince themselves that other people want to touch their bodies?... That other people want to be caressed by the meatless rolls of ribcage bellyfat sent wafting across the armrest by every twitch of the winglet?

No, you silly, simpering weaselbun, the measurements of the airline seat are NOT the problem. The problem is your behavior... Your indulgence at the lunch counter and dinner table and your failure to exercise in proportion. You're taking your most personal emotional failures and indiscriminately casting them off for other people to deal with. This is aggressive behavior, and there's no reason you should be forgiven.

Do these men think there's something masculine about their intrusions? Do these women think there's something feminine in their unspoken, uncompensated demand for patience from others?

Your gelatinous thighs, your flapping stomachs, your waddling arms: Who should have to put up with this?

Seriously: What the fuck? What?

Havard wants you...to be a scab!

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/10/10/starving-harvard-hires-scabs-to-replace-striking-cafeteria-workers.html

YouTube Heroes in action:

http://www.crunchyroll.com/anime-news/2016/10/10/busty-girl-illustration-series-gets-short-anime-video-then-gets-yanked-from-youtube

It begins:

A female officer in Chicago was "severely beaten" when responding to an accident this week, sending her and two other cops to the hospital.

http://ijr.com/2016/10/709373-female-cop-was-afraid-to-pull-gun-in-fear-of-backlash-she-staggered-away-nearly-beaten-to-death/

HRC plans new tax credit for those who carefully plan out having children, as well as those too stupid to figure out birth control:

http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/10/hillary_clinton_kid_tax_credit.html

Here's a PSA:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fT5xBiDyjrA

If you often see these wasps in your home/business, it means you might have a roach problem since these wasps lay their eggs on the roach's egg capsules.

Sixclaws,
Policing policy should be changing w/respect to handling blacks. Although she got a no-win situation there w/him on PCP. He feels no pain and is really pissed off. Maybe a weighted net to tie him up.

Fast response is not a policeman's friend (no reward for getting there quickly and getting the shit beat out of you or worse you hurt them).

A coordinated response is now mandatory. (The victim's are either safe or dead so what's the rush.)

Cameras from a defensive POV, multiple officers w/pepper spray and then back away, no batons, no guns, lots of film. Stop the shouting (which one of the yelling idiots do you respond to?). Passive weapons (nets) for those really out of it. Pain is not going to work on them and the cell phones murder you.

De-escalate at all costs. Where the hell can they go? You got pictures/id of some sort. If they hurt a civilian getting away police are not responsible legally anyway. Why bother. No reward for taking down a brother.

It's a brave new world and I hope you CCW carry.

"They've halted sales and production of the Note 7, and I presume they'll be providing replacement phones or refunds for those who purchased the product."

One of the replacement ones caught fire on an airline flight last week. Samsung is paralyzed. Motto: Control your supply chain. Especially if critical parts of it are in China.

One of the replacement ones caught fire on an airline flight last week.

Which is why they're stopping production on the Note 7 in its current iteration and requesting current owners to bring their phones in for replacment with a different model.

Given the awful press and Samsung's reaction to this on going fiasco, the Note brand is likely toxic and will never see the light of day for a generation.

Also, my understanding is that the problem batteries were produced in Samsung's facilities, not their Chinese partner, who also produces batteries for Apple. How that came to be I do not know, but I also haven't studied it closely so it may not be true.

Techdirt reports on a court decision, emphasis mine:

The shorter version of this legal theory:

A criminal act was committed. Criminals often use cell phones to communicate and/or document their criminal acts. Therefore, any phone can be seized and held without establishing probable cause for the seizure. Just in case.

The court isn't interested in entertaining law enforcement's assertion that it should be able to seize electronic devices speculatively.

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20161001/08560835675/court-shuts-down-argument-that-warrantless-seizures-cell-phones-is-fine-because-criminals-use-cell-phones.shtml

Substitute "car" for "phone" if you're not seeing the problem with this theory.

IRA, one of the comments:

"I think the term you're looking for here is 'civil asset forfeiture'."

Is this even legal?

http://www.dailydot.com/irl/nyc-pharmacy-man-tax/

Reliable liberal, Susan Sarandon, says Hillary is the dangerous one.

Given the awful press and Samsung's reaction to this on going fiasco, the Note brand is likely toxic and will never see the light of day for a generation.

This is what an explodaphone was before Samsung.

Forbes says Trump understands energy issues better than Clinton.

Okay, it turns out she was a cute lawyer from SanFran area, so we talked about a lot of stuff at everything's cool.

But don't bother me with that shit unless you're an articulate and attractive person with interesting things to say.

I mean it. I mean it.

You see, Amy, it wasn't George Clooney or Slick Willy trying to high-five them on the tram - that's why they are pissed off at him.

"Is this even legal?"

Sure it is. Men in general are second-class citizens and are not protected by discrimination laws.

A more functional link:

http://www.salon.com/2016/06/03/susan_sarandon_hillary_clinton_more_dangerous_than_donald_trump/