In College Sexual Assault Cases, Men Are Perps And Women Are Victims
Even if a man claims to be victimized, he doesn't get treated as if he is, if a Cornell case is any model for how things are going on other campuses. Oh, and there are dribs and drabs to suggest it kinda is:
What "Equal Rights" Means If You're Male It's usually men who are the ones accused of sexual assault on campus -- and expelled for it, even if they were passed out drunk at the time the assault took place, as in, even if they were the victim.(The woman in that case, at Amherst, blew the guy while he was unconscious. Of course, under the new Obama admin "civil rights" normal, he was the one booted out of school.)
Josh Girsky writes for the Cornell Sun -- the Cornell student newspaper:
Already in the midst of five open Title IX investigations, Cornell is now facing a lawsuit alleging that the University's Title IX coordinator, Sarah Affel, neglected to investigate a complaint by a student who was involved in a sexual assault.The lawsuit states that two students -- referred to as John Doe and Jane Roe -- accused each other of sexual assault and says the University opened investigations into both complaints.
However, according to the lawyer behind the suit, Alan Sash, Cornell's investigators only considered Roe's complaint and ignored Doe's on the basis of his gender.
And charmingly, as on so many campuses, if you're a male, well, no due process for you-oo-oo:
The suit claims that, among other infractions, the investigator refused to properly handle Doe's complaint, conducted biased interviews against Doe in favor of Roe and presented as evidence an unrecorded interview that could not be fact checked by Doe.In addition, the suit alleges that Doe was mistreated during the investigation, saying investigators denied him opportunities to speak with his lawyer before answering certain questions and refused to request that Roe preserve certain pieces of evidence that she possessed.
After the initial sexual assault investigation, the suit says that Doe sent a 17 page letter to Affel detailing how he was discriminated against during the investigation, and Affel responded by recommending that he meet with Deputy Title IX coordinator, Laurie Johnston, to file a complaint.
However, after not responding to inquiries about the status of the investigation, Doe realized that his next claim was also not being conducted as he had expected.
Silly man probably expected all those civil liberties we've come to believe are part of justice in America.
Oh, and keep in mind how it tends to work after college, if you're male:








Amy's last point is overly optimistic. A chalk outline of a man's body is usually celebrated as "justified retaliation."
dee nile at November 21, 2016 5:40 AM
If/when Trump issues a "letter of understanding" to clarify how will MSM report on this?
Headline:
"Trump ignores professionals and rape victims."
First sentence:
"In one of its ongoing attacks on women's health issues the Trump administration today ... "
Bob in Texas at November 21, 2016 5:49 AM
I suspect that like Schwarzenegger, Trump will find a number of or most of his campaign promises impossible to keep. (If he even cares. He has not shown himself to be a person of integrity -- and no, Hillary Clinton isn't one, either. But new is not always better.)
Amy Alkon at November 21, 2016 5:56 AM
Trump may turn out to be as bad as you say, but he has not spent one minute in office. Maybe we ought to consider evidence before convicting people.
MarkD at November 21, 2016 6:47 AM
The problem with kangaroo courts is that when they become fashionable, many innocent people are swept up by them. Ask all the witches burned in Europe, who were not witches (and mostly women by the way). They were often the victims of personal beefs. All that was required was an accusation. Ask the victims of the Inquisition in Spain. Not all jews. Ask those in that daycare accused of sexual abuse of the children. Ask the fathers accused by daughters whose therapists found "suppressed memories". Oh, yeah, and ask the victims of the French revolution. But those who set up kangaroo courts never think it will happen to them. hah
cc at November 21, 2016 9:19 AM
(The woman in that case, at Amherst, blew the guy while he was unconscious. Of course, under the new Obama admin "civil rights" normal, he was the one booted out of school.)
Oh for the days when I could be passed out drunk and still get it up. Youth is wasted on the young.
Steve Daniels at November 21, 2016 10:08 AM
I've spoken before on these pages about my expulsion from Law school in 2006 for claims of "sexual harassment" that would be funny if it wasn't so goddamn sad.
I am now thriving in another career,set to retire in six years (I'll be 55) and my wife and I have never had life so good.
I was sitting in the hot tub the other night - as is my habit - watching the Arizona sun set behind the mountains. The thought struck me out of the blue -
It was worth it. To see the looks on all those peoples faces, to hear the lamentation of the women (and the wymyn)when Donald Trump got elected - oh shit. So.Worth.It.
The WolfMan at November 21, 2016 3:07 PM
It doesn't always go against the man. My stepson was attacked by his girlfriend not long ago, and he got a restraining order against her.
Rex Little at November 21, 2016 11:01 PM
Leave a comment