Vox Day had a post a while back about virtually identical twitter comments with the races reversed.

First tweet: "I fucking hate white people and their inconsiderate asses for voting for Trump. Fuck you!" 1:57 AM 9 Nov 2016

Twitter response to first tweet: "Thank you for reporting this issue to us. Our goal is to create a safe environment for everyone on Twitter to express themselves freely. We reviewed your report carefully and found that there was no violation of Twitter's Rules regarding abusive behavior."

Follow up tweet: "I fucking hate black people and their inconsiderate asses for voting for Clinton. Fuck you!" 4:08 AM 16 Nov 2016

Twitter response to follow up tweet: "We've investigated and suspended the account you reported as it was found to be participating in abusive behavior."

Both tweets are horrid, but that's the point. Some people can only see wrong when done by those they don't agree with (or pander to).

Apparently, only white people engage in the racist act of sleeping.

No, only white people have jobs and care about keeping them and being on time to them in the morning.

Boom-Boom apparently doesn't have a job and no one in his circle has one either, so in his worldview, the only people with jobs are white people. Screw them.

He needs to expand his worldview to include black people with jobs and white people without jobs. Then, and only then, he might see that how he defines the world is wrong and myopic.

The heart of racism (in either direction) is a deliberately limited worldview.

In a grammatical twist, there are still places in the U.S. where you can get your ass beat for referring to "colored people".
The U.S. Census Bureau predicts that by 2044 non-Hispanic whites will be a minority group. Right now persons-of-color have some entitlements and special privileges. If they retain those when they are a majority, will that make them the oppressors? I'd say they are headed down that road already.

"Right now persons-of-color have some entitlements and special privileges."

Some?

"It is curious that blacks, the least educated thirteen percent of the population, the least productive, most criminal, and most dependent on governmental charity, should dominate national politics. Yet they do. Virtually everything revolves around what blacks want, demand, do, or can’t do. Their power seems without limit.
Courses of instruction in the schools, academic rigor, codes of dress, rules regarding unceasing obscenity, all must be set to suit them, as must be examinations for promotion in fire departments, the military, and police forces. Blacks must be admitted to universities for which they are not remotely qualified, where departments of Black Studies must be established to please them. Corporate work forces, federal departments, and elite high-schools must be judged not on whether they perform their functions but on whether they have the right number of blacks."

All of this in the face of the plain fact that "African-American" is a manufactured term covering more area and more diversity than most of the rest of the world - a term designed to convey political power in the USA to those who would wield it.

"Boom-Boom apparently doesn't have a job"

Boom-Boom drives a pretty nice, pretty new looking BMW sedan with a personalized plate. He looked not only employed, but well-employed. He was also nicely groomed and dressed and kind of handsome -- until his mouth unleashed all those ugly words.

In fact, it seems his car is a 2015 or 2016, judging by the plate color -- the black California "legacy plate" they started putting out again in 2015.

http://www.lamag.com/driver/the-colorful-history-of-california-license-plates/

It's possible he ordered the plate for an older model, but his sedan did look pretty new and spiffy.

I make a ongoing series of anti-Social Justice Warrior videos on YouTube (and out of respect for our hostess, I will not link them here). One such video, which I directed to black people, I said that I would never use the term "people of color."

The term simply means, "anyone except white people." So, I said in my video that I'll call it what it is: non-whites.

And what did the driver say to the other black man, if anything?

Had the black pedestrian been the only one to complain about the noise, I wonder what type of people the driver would have claimed to hate. "Losers" who don't have a BMW anywhere in sight, maybe. Or "fogeys" who make reasonable demands, even if the complainers appear to be in their teens.

I'm a person of color. It's a delightful beige-y pink.

The black girl on your block is obviously an Oreo (black on the oustide, white on the inside), so the obnoxious black man's comment is still valid. /sarc

"Mexico is a country composed mainly of two ethnic groups -- the descendants of the Spanish conquistadors, who slaughtered the indigenous Indians; and the descendants of the survivors of their conquest, the indigenous Indians"

The wording of this really bugs me. It's not two ethnic groups. Most of mexico is composed of an identity of a third ethnic group: mestizo or landino a mix between the two.

He's making it seem like like Americans tend to do between blacks and whites with the one drop rule. I've noticed Americans do this alot with race but that's not how race is perceived in Latin America. There is no "either or" in Latin America.

There is no one drop rule in Mexico. So no most Mexicans dont perceive themselves as one or the other. Indigenous people are perceived as something wholly independent of them, separate and from what I've seen not in a positive light. That's different here where black people like Halley Berry still perceive themselves as black (in Latin American she wouldn't,).

Pure whites are only 10% of the population. Pure Indians are 20%. Both of those groups rarely come to the U.S.

People of color is a stupid term but when you can't even get shit right about why people use for it Mexicans it annoys me. They use it for Mexicans because most Mexicans don't perceive themselves as white, including white looking Mexicans like Jorge Ramos.

> The wording of this really bugs me.

Relax. It gets a lot worse than that.

"PS Dude, there's a black girl on my block you were keeping awake, too. Does that change anything?"

Probably not. He'd just use a different set of insults.

The 600 odd Spanish gold-fiends did not defeat the millions of Aztecs and their buddies by themselves - they had the assistance of about 100,000 other locals who hated the Aztecs worse than the Spaniards. After the conquest many local chiefs who helped the Spaniards were rewarded with large land grants and Spanish names like Don Pedro. So if the new Don Pedro wastes some of his local enemies, it gets blamed on the Spaniards.

If you want to know what happened, an excellent book by Bernal Díaz del Castillo, an officer with the gold-fiends, is an eyewitness account:

The Memoirs of the Conquistador Bernal Diaz del Castillo, Vol 1 and 2 at the link and in various downloadable formats:

http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/author/35868