Underprivileged Black Children As Pawns For Profit And Acclaim
Erica L. Green and Katie Benner write in The New York Times about T.M. Landry, a small-town Louisiana school that got national attention for getting its underprivileged black students into elite colleges. How did the school do it? Actually, by cutting corners and fabricating students' background on college applications:
BREAUX BRIDGE, La. -- Bryson Sassau's application would inspire any college admissions officer.A founder of T.M. Landry College Preparatory School described him as a "bright, energetic, compassionate and genuinely well-rounded" student whose alcoholic father had beaten him and his mother and had denied them money for food and shelter. His transcript "speaks for itself," the founder, Tracey Landry, wrote, but Mr. Sassau should also be lauded for founding a community service program, the Dry House, to help the children of abusive and alcoholic parents. He took four years of honors English, the application said, was a baseball M.V.P. and earned high honors in the "Mathematics Olympiad."
The narrative earned Mr. Sassau acceptance to St. John's University in New York. There was one problem: None of it was true.
"I was just a small piece in a whole fathom of lies," Mr. Sassau said.
T.M. Landry has become a viral Cinderella story, a small school run by Michael Landry, a teacher and former salesman, and his wife, Ms. Landry, a nurse, whose predominantly black, working-class students have escaped the rural South for the nation's most elite colleges. A video of a 16-year-old student opening his Harvard acceptance letter last year has been viewed more than eight million times. Other Landry students went on to Yale, Brown, Princeton, Stanford, Columbia, Dartmouth, Cornell and Wesleyan.
Here's the profit motive:
Landry success stories have been splashed in the past two years on the "Today" show, "Ellen" and the "CBS This Morning."...After each viral video and media appearance, donors including wealthy executives and older Americans on fixed incomes sent money. T.M. Landry took in more than $250,000 in donations this year, a portion of which was earmarked by the donors for tuition assistance, according to records of the donations obtained by The Times.
But the school has not yet offered any scholarships, said Greg Davis, a T.M. Landry board member. Mr. Landry said donations were put into a general account, but he declined to say how the money was spent.
The biggest price is paid by the students who are accepted to schools they aren't actually prepared for:
For yet other Landry students, particularly those who spent multiple years at the school, the results after graduation have been disappointing. Some have withdrawn from college, or transferred to less rigorous programs.Asja Jackson, whose Wesleyan University acceptance video also went viral, decided to leave this month after she said she fell into a depression over her first-semester struggles. She said she "froze and failed" her first chemistry tests and walked out of a biology exam. Her papers, she said, were "childish," and she was too embarrassed to attend a writing workshop.
She studied and worked through the night, like she had done at T.M. Landry since eighth grade, but she just was not "catching it," she said. She said she eventually stopped eating, talking to her friends, leaving her room or going to class.
"I didn't understand why people around me were doing well, and I wasn't," said Ms. Jackson, who took the advice of her dean and started medical leave. "I couldn't tell my friends because they would say, 'How did you get into the school then?' There were too many questions that I couldn't answer."
And what are these kids actually being taught:
Adam Broussard, a Landry parent, noticed last fall that his 8-year-old, who had attended the school since he was 3, was writing "chicken scratch." Mr. Broussard had been happy with the school -- his older son had been admitted to Brown after two years at Landry -- but he confronted Mr. Landry about his younger son's progress. Mr. Landry responded that he did not teach sentence structure and just wanted students to love to write.An independent assessment at Sylvan Learning Center revealed that Mr. Broussard's younger son was performing two grade levels behind.
"I gave him my son for six years, almost every day, 12 months of the year," Mr. Broussard said of Mr. Landry. "The longer these kids stayed there, the further behind they were."
News of the Broussard boy's low test scores spread last fall, and at least eight parents interviewed by The Times had their own students assessed. Of their 11 students, only two were performing at grade level, while the rest had fallen behind or made no progress. One junior was performing at a fourth-grade level in reading and math.
This is criminally tragic.
The kids who go to this school have parents who are motivated to get them an education -- little did these parents know that the real learning experience (about the school) would come years later, when their kid can't begin to do the work in college.








Still wondering why anyone thinks that "education" - in quotes because there is apparent discord about what it means - of one's children is the job of others.
If it could be any more obvious that ignorant and apathetic parents create similarly useless offspring, I don't know how.
Radwaste at December 1, 2018 11:57 PM
Call me cynical (because I am); but I'm always suspicious of people or organizations that rake in large sums of money by claiming to want to help needy children or others.
They never seem to release any empirical data showing what percentage of their booty actually went to these supposed needy groups.
Jay at December 2, 2018 6:13 AM
Look - everyone involved in this deception was complicit. The students and their parents knew that they were submitting false information in their college applications. They did so because they knew that the school would vouch for them. It was a conspiracy to game the admissions process.
mormon at December 2, 2018 8:09 AM
To Mormon's point, as a parent, you should know if your child is performing at grade-level or not. You may not know what that specific grade-level is or not, but you can see if your child is making progress.
And your Spidey sense should be tingling wildly when a teacher or school administrator responds to questions about your child's "chicken scratch" writing with a statement "that he [does] not teach sentence structure and just [wants] students to love to write."
The problem is that most public schools are not doing much better. Too many students are graduated with sub-standard skills. Chronic teacher absenteeism, combined with pressure to increase graduation rates has destroyed our ability to trust the government-run school system to educate our children.
Our public schools are unaccountable for their own bad performance, changing standards to obscure their own failure.
Conan the Grammarian at December 2, 2018 10:20 AM
We are raising an 8 year old grandson who is in the public school system in Canada. He reads to me every night for 20 minutes or more and we met with his teachers two weeks ago for the parent/teacher conference that occurs every few months. If he begins to fall behind we will not be waiting years to find that out.
These parents may be motivated to get their children an education, but they are not participating in the process.
Steamer at December 2, 2018 11:44 AM
"It was a conspiracy to game the admissions process."
... and the universities are eager to be gamed. Double-bonus diversity points! The schools get to pat themselves on the back for their virtue, and brag to their colleagues at conferences. The students get unearned accolades. The shock comes when they find out that the basic premise of life that they have been raised with is a lie: achievement and success really do require work, and that most people who are successful got that way by showing up every day and putting in the effort. But once they have been admitted and the diversity points tallied (and the student loan checks cashed), the school doesn't care.
Of course, the only reason this is a story is because Landry is a private school. This will put Landry out of business, which is how it should be. Meanwhile, public schools that do the same thing will continue on without the media being the slightest bit curious, and anyone who criticizes those schools will simply be branded a racist.
Cousin Dave at December 3, 2018 8:01 AM
Leave a comment