We've seen worse!

We've talked about this before - but here you go: one deciding factor was that Sarah wasn't talking to Natalie when the USS Fitzgerald failed to avoid a tanker.

"OMG, she's such a bitch!" CRASH!

Obama telling people to learn to code:

https://twitter.com/mombot/status/1089839621670752256

Another shaving commercial. #LOL

https://youtu.be/CzC47F1DTO8

And for your musical interlude, a drum line.

https://youtu.be/B-2QEeTgDLw

Well, it is her wedding. The meat-eaters should have gotten together and grilled.

In today's dose of alarming/unpractical/hilarious viral wedding news, one vegan bride in Australia is getting slammed for not inviting meat-eating family members to her nuptials. Her reasoning? Because they're "murderers." (That's one way to narrow down your guest list.)

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/vegan-bride-tried-ban-meat-162000131.html

Things are cooking in France. It isn't good.

https://twitter.com/RichardWellings/status/1089263922186805248

Why haven't there been assault with deadly weapon or attempted murder charges been filed?

https://www.bostonherald.com/2019/01/27/state-police-gun-owner-stops-rolling-road-rage-on-pike/

Don't laugh, I dare you.

https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/319801/

I laughed. I denounce myself, and will report to the reeducation camp.

> deadly weapon or
> attempted murder

What's this "on a person over 60" stuff? Is such a violation more or less condemnable?

Hmm? Why I'm asking?

Oh, no reason, really... Just curious.

Is such a violation more or less condemnable?

In this case, probably not since it appears to me that the old man is the instigator. I'll guess it's supposed to protect feeble old folks who tell kids to get off their lawn.

https://youtu.be/NelBNtNm8l0

Not feeble old folks who try to run you down. If the law was more along the lines of "if you beat on someone who is physically unable to defend themselves, you get more time" that would be OK. I'm pretty sure there's more than one or two 60+ers who can still kick ass.

Cold.

https://twitter.com/RichardPainter0/status/1089346826271100928

But, twitter to the rescue!

https://twitter.com/GayPatriot/status/1089589379079827456

Learning to program computers is racist. Who knew?

Hmmm...you don't look at all like your picture

https://metro.co.uk/2014/05/30/chinese-kid-draws-all-over-dads-passport-dad-gets-stuck-in-south-korea-4745289/

Hmm.. Watching all those rock stars -who also had a lifetime of drug/alcohol abuse- in their late 60s and 70s having normal children tells me something else.

https://twitter.com/girlband777/status/1090005937560141826

I think Evergreen already fits that to a tee

Alex Madajian, a former SBCC student, told Campus Reform in a phone interview that the decision to pull the Pledge of Allegiance from BOT meetings has made SBCC “the Berkeley of community colleges.”

https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=11805

“I also object to the phrase ‘one nation under God,’” Miller said. ~ from the link by Sixclaws at January 28, 2019 3:16 PM

So many people who claim to object to the Pledge of Allegiance use that line as their main objection and claim First Amendment protection. As if that line somehow give their objection to the Pledge a Constitutional foundation.

First, that line was added in the '50s to distinguish us from the "godless" Communists. It's not a government imposition of religious belief.

Second, the First Amendment promises you freedom of religion, not freedom from religion.

If the guy next to you at a public function wants to pray, he's not violating your civil rights. If everyone in the room wants to join him, they're not violating your civil rights either.

Freedom of religion in this country is not a tit-for-tat thing. You don't get to have a statue of a half-naked goat-man put on the courthouse lawn just because someone once had the Ten Commandments posted there.

The Ten Commandments were at least the basis of a historically recognized system of laws. Your goat-man is just a goat-man; nothing more than a temper tantrum writ large.

Everyone's favorite "democratic socialist" chastises Facebook, Microsoft, and Google CEOs for their sponsorship of Libertarian conference that included a panel questioning climate change.

The religious wars have begun.

https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1089948199593410561

I wonder if this is just Americanski propaganda.

It's got that rubbery, not-quite-right feel about it.