It’s almost as if someone said “No one has less knowledge of science, a higher opinion of himself, and a bigger carbon footprint than Al Gore” and Kerry replies “hold my champagne, I’m going to testify as a climate change expert.”

https://amgreatness.com/2019/04/11/professor-winter-soldier-testifies-about-climate-change/

Three paedophiles have been handed nearly half a million pounds in legal aid – 10 times the maximum compensation due to their two victims.

The evil trio were ringleaders of a gang who drugged and raped two girls aged 14.

Their lawyers have received £425,495 from the taxpayer.

In contrast, the victims will be eligible for criminal injuries payouts of between £11,000 and £44,000.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/three-paedophiles-245k-legal-aid-14308677

Ok, which one of you wise guys took over Cher's twitter account?

https://twitter.com/michaeljknowles/status/1117565187991584768

Paris is burning!

The Cathedral de Notre Dame de Paris is on fire. The spire has already fallen.

Go, Adrian! She's been through a buttload of crap and keeps coming back!

Boston Bombing Survivor Adrianne Haslet Runs BAA 5K Just 3 Months After Car Strike

"Their lawyers have received £425,495 from the taxpayer."

That's only fair. Lawyer = 10(pedophile)

Who is inciting violence?

https://twitter.com/nickmon1112/status/1117207748599517184

A follow-up to a recent post about Modern Monetary Theory - Return of the Neo-Keynesians.

Slept all day, woke up dame on fire.

Dear secular zombies— YOU DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE STUPID. Or physically destructive

The comment section on that MMT article says all you need to know about MMT. I don't think I saw a single comment that actually offered a real defense of MMT. Instead you get one of two categories,
1 - That isn't MMT. I won't say what MMT is but that isn't it so your argument is invalid.
2 - You just don't understand MMT. (I certainly won't explain it but you are wrong so there!)

Which is very similar to the 'True Communism has never failed. It just has never been implemented right.' arguments.

My biggest annoyance with all of this is McConnell and Ryan have made it clear they have no issue with vast spending increases. They see no reason live within their means. At least McConnell has been honest about that. Ryan has talked about sound fiscal policy. Written quite a bit about it. But his actions make it clear those were just words and not intended to be considered serious.

> You just don't understand

Centralized clearinghouses, as far as the eye can see!! No time for college!

Transgender tyranny:

Preferred Pronouns or Prison

Okay, it was a construction accident.

BUT STILL.

Did all the immigrants do anything stop it? DID THEY SMOTHER THE FLAMES WITH THE FLESH OF THEIR OWN IMMIGRANT BODIES?????

__.

AHA!

I THOUGHT not!

Faith AND reason:

Why Has The West Been So Successful?

Naw, just allergies.

And Crid joins in as an MMT expert. Can't take the time to actually make an argument. Just 'You don't understand man!'

On an interesting sidebar since Crid brought bitcoin up yet again, bitcoin really needs a bit-credit card if it ever wants to get out of the niche gold bug market. Each transaction with bitcoin has a fixed minimum cost in both time and energy (i.e. money). Especially the time cost makes small transactions with bitcoin untenable. Buying a candy bar at a supermarket would take over half an hour and the transaction costs would be more than the candy bar is worth. This strongly discourages it's use for small transactions which results in it's 'investment' reputation. Exchanging $1,000 and $1 have the same costs. There isn't really a per unit cost here. So having a third party credit guaranteer who would gather all those small transactions up at a reduced cost and enter them into the system at the end of the month would open the bitcoin system up to a wider range of goods and services.

> which results in it's
> 'investment' reputation.

1. Ludicrous economics fantasy.

2. Bogus deployment of single-quotes.

3. Erroneous apostrophe in "it's."

Did you go to college? What was your major?

Master of Science Electrical Engineer.

Once again you have no argument, only teenage snark. If you actually have something you want to say by all means say it. Support your claims. Provide an argument beyond 'Did you ever kiss a girl?' But I won't hold my breath waiting. Your urge to troll is strong. Unfortunately it does little to convince people.

You're not a finance sophisticate. People can tell.

"Support your claims" is a strange assignment from a guy who established his presence with bogus accusations, but when pressed for citation, resented being asked to "do my homework."

The internet is crawling with people who feign expertise. After all these years, their tears still sparkle in sunlight.

So once again, you've got nothing. Insults, snark, but nothing of substance. Come on Crid. It isn't that hard to actually make an argument or present some facts instead of lobbing insults. I mean how much more homework do I need other than this conversation to prove you are a troll?

If you want to say something of substance I'm all ears.

Anything Crid? You've had days to come up with something more than teenage insults. Anything?