How Is Google Coloring What You Can See On The Internet?
Brent Sher reports at Free Beacon that Google appears to be protecting Jussie Smollett from "disparaging searches":
News that Chicago police charged Jussie Smollett with staging a brutal attack on himself was covered on every network and in every major newspaper, but Google is hiding searches of it from its platform due to concerns of "potentially disparaging" the liberal actor.A review of Google's autocomplete function on searches of Smollett found no references to anything regarding the hate crime, even though the company's own data show it is the only reason his name was ever searched.
The top suggested searches for Smollett included Empire (a show he no longer has a role in), Mighty Ducks (a nearly three-decade old movie he had a small role in as a child), and his wife (who doesn't exist), the Free Beacon found.
Even with a nudge--adding the letter "H" to indicate an interest in the Smollett "hate crime" or "hoax"--the top suggestions were inquiries into his height and ties to Hawaii.
...On Bing, a Google competitor, search suggestions don't appear to be censored--they're all about the hate crime for Smollett, rape accusers for Weinstein, and about the protest video for Sandmann.
...Google was accused in 2016 of attempting to boost Hillary Clinton's campaign by manipulating search suggestions to hide negative stories about her and push positive ones. The Free Beacon found numerous examples, but Google denied any intentional bias.
Most of us consider Google a sort of public utility -- and I think we're wrong to do so. This is a big heads up for those of us, like me, who weren't really thinking about the prospect of this or paying attention.
via ifeminist








In related news, I've read almost fifteen entire words about the new Facebook currency. I think it's either going to be the end of civilization as we know it —after all, a billion adoring customers have already forgiven that company for each of its sins— or its going to be the grinding, historical humiliation that Zuckerberg deserves.
Saif.
Crid at June 19, 2019 3:32 AM
I've just googled it and found plenty of stuff about the attacks and arrest....
NicoleK at June 19, 2019 6:38 AM
Yeah, but that's not the same thing. Google is diminishing serendipitous discovery.
Crid at June 19, 2019 7:58 AM
What the article is talking about is not the actual search results, but the auto-complete suggestions that you get when you type in the beginning of a search string. It's kind of small potatoes, but it does fit the pattern.
I normally use Bing. (Never would have thought, 15 years ago, that I'd be using a Microsoft product to avoid anti-competitive behavior...) I've been trying to use DuckDuckGo, but I haven't gotten the hang of using its search engine.
Cousin Dave at June 19, 2019 8:11 AM
> (Never would have thought, 15 years ago,
> that I'd be using a Microsoft product to
> avoid anti-competitive behavior...)
✓
CRid at June 19, 2019 8:14 AM
I'll add that I'm starting to use MeWe for social networking, although so far I only have a few friends. They guarantee privacy and don't insert ads into your feed. In some ways it's more capable than Facebook, and in some ways it still needs work. But the UI is stable; they don't change it every other day like Facebook does. And MeWe doesn't do annoying things like making you click on "See more comments" fifty times in order to see all of a long thread.
Also starting to use Infogalactic as an alternative to Wikipedia. Infogalactic doesn't have any standards for what constitutes being "notable" enough to include. This might end up with it being full of trash, but at least it doesn't have a clique of super-empowered editors that use "notability" as an excuse to censor anything that they don't like.
Cousin Dave at June 19, 2019 8:21 AM
There is a lot of monkey-business with Google search. Last year I think if you searched "american families images" you only got interracial couples--not doing it now.
Autocomplete is very wonky.
I've found Bing to be deficient in many cases but it is good to have an alternative. Don't know how duckduckgo makes money.
cc at June 19, 2019 8:40 AM
Just did it for you. I got mostly monoracial families, but a wide range.... mostly white but some black, Muslim/Middle Eastern looking, asian, and beige could be white or hispanic.
NicoleK at June 19, 2019 12:24 PM
If you think they are manipulation searches for Jussie, just think what they are doing for all their pet democratic politicians, that are in google’s pocket.
Isab at June 19, 2019 2:16 PM
Google tailors the results according to the info they have about you.
Open a browser in incognito/private mode and see the difference.
Sixclaws at June 19, 2019 2:55 PM
Try google images: 'American inventors'. Was supposedly something they did for Black history month years ago but never turned off.
"f you think they are manipulation searches for Jussie, just think what they are doing for all their pet democratic politicians, that are in google’s pocket. " Isab
Was talking with a friend a few weeks ago, about media manipulation. How one could bias searches not through the algorithm, but in other ways. The way we came up with was, when politicians get accused/convicted of crimes, (so many do, more deserve it) if they are R's make sure Republican is repeated often in the article especially the headline. And if it's a D, never have it appear in the headline, and if you put it in the article, quote a R or two so you can have the word Republican in the article too.
Or as CNN did with the VA Gov. blackface, call him the wrong party.
Then even a fair search engine would ping way more on "Republican accused of" Than "Democrat accused of".
Joe J at June 19, 2019 3:02 PM
Yep, American inventors... 2 white men, 1 black woman, and a bunch of black men. You are right.
NicoleK at June 20, 2019 2:10 AM
Now try the same thing in Spanish or most other languages NicoleK. You get different answers depending on the language you use.
At this point I'm trying to eliminate all google products from my life. There are better alternatives out there and google has passed my tolerance for creepy and misleading.
Ben at June 20, 2019 7:34 AM
Heh I just did inventeurs américains... mostly white dudes and a couple ladies...
NicoleK at June 22, 2019 12:01 PM
Is that because americans specifically search for black inventors though? I can't imagine French people specifically searching for black american inventors. Black French ones. American ones. But not Black American ones...
NicoleK at June 22, 2019 12:03 PM
Ben, what are you using instead of google? I'd like to as well, because of the Saudi slave, I mean wife, tracking app...
NicoleK at June 22, 2019 12:04 PM
This problem is much broader than just google. The whole existence of a "mainstream" (and thus an Overton Window) assumes and requires the existence of news media that are trusted enough for one to form. That condition no longer obtains, and likely never will again.
jdgalt at June 24, 2019 11:51 AM
Leave a comment