Government Will Step In To Adult For You!
"Adult" as a verb. Yes, I'm sorry.
But a question for you: In the wake of Senator Josh Hawley's new bill banning YouTube autoplay and other features designed to make services "addictive," should he next rightfully take on chocolate cake and Olive Garden breadsticks?
Or...will we continue to shepherd our own behavior in respect to delicious food while Senator Hawley and his fellow govern-nannies step in in loco parentis for all of us in the technosphere?
More from Slashdot:
Hawley's Social Media Addiction Reduction Technology Act, or the SMART Act, would ban these features that work to keep users on platforms longer, along with others, like Snapstreaks, that incentivize the continued use of these products. If approved, the Federal Trade Commission and Health and Human Services could create similar rules that would expire after three years unless Congress codified them into law. "Big tech has embraced a business model of addiction," Hawley said. "Too much of the 'innovation' in this space is designed not to create better products, but to capture more attention by using psychological tricks that make it difficult to look away."Deceptive design played an enormous part in last week's FTC settlement with Facebook, and Hawley's bill would make it unlawful for tech companies to use dark patterns to manipulate users into opting into services. For example, "accept" and "decline" checkboxes would need to be the same font, color, and size to help users make better, more informed choices. "Social media companies deploy a host of tactics designed to manipulate users in ways that undermines their wellbeing," said Josh Golin, executive director of campaign for a Commercial Free Childhood.
You're in charge of your wellbeing, Josh, same as I'm in charge of mine. Or that's how it should be. At a certain point, I get off the Internet and go read a bunch of journal articles or go scratch my dog's tummy (an act which she thinks should be blocked out on the calendar).
This is what adults do.
If you, on the other hand, are an adult who act like willful 4-year-old, there's something you can do, and it's hire a minder -- not remake the Internet with legislator-designed parental controls for the rest of us.








"Big tech has embraced a business model of addiction," Hawley said. "Too much of the 'innovation' in this space is designed not to create better products, but to capture more attention by using psychological tricks that make it difficult to look away."
Or "stop eating." Or "walk away from the slot machine."
"Addiction," in its slangiest sense, is the business model for many products that aren't illegal, but stimulate brain receptors.
I agree this can be a problem with children's heads, but theoretically there's a parent involved who can lay down the law (oh, my sides!).
As far as adults, it's none of Mr. Hawley's business, nor yours, nor mine.
Kevin at July 30, 2019 10:41 PM
All soon to be covered in the 'Stop liking things I don't like' bill of 2020.
Ben at July 31, 2019 5:50 AM
I'd be in favor of banning autoplay video for a completely different reason -- it's a use of my bandwidth that I didn't authorize. However, I agree that, in general, Hawley's bill is over-regulation. It's also, from the looks of it, going to turn out to be yet another bill that grants broad discretionary powers to unelected bureaucrats, which means that corruption and abuse will be along shortly.
Cousin Dave at July 31, 2019 6:20 AM
How long before regulation of "addictive" technology" becomes regulation of content?
If Golin thinks this is limited to social media companies, he needs to wake up. A host of non- social media companies has been manipulating users for decades. "Stores are carefully engineered, and every aspect of the design has a highly specific purpose — from the background music to the interior wall color."
In the '20s and '30s grocery stores were small shops where you presented a list to the grocer and he sent a helper to the back room to get your items. Grocers discovered that if people could touch a product, they were more likely to buy it and open-shelf designs replaced back rooms.
F.W. Woolworth was famous for pricing things at $4.99 instead of $5.00, having discovered that people were more willing to buy the product at what they perceived as a lower price - this was back when that 1¢ difference could be used to splurge on candy or gum.
Sam Walton added a greeter to his stores, not because he wanted them to be friendly, but because a friendly greeter helped get the customer in a good mood and ready to spend money.
So, Hawley is upset that social media companies manipulate us? Welcome to the party, pal.
Conan the Grammarian at July 31, 2019 7:10 AM
There's a special place in hell for the designers of autoplay media. Right next to the place for Netscape's engineers who thought that sending email both as plain text and html marked up text was a Good Idea.
I R A Darth Aggie at July 31, 2019 9:55 AM
Olive Garden breadsticks: Yes.
Chocolate Cake: No.
It's a particularly pernicious form of xenophobia to suggest otherwise. Think of the children.
El Verde Loco at July 31, 2019 11:34 AM
Leave a comment