Calm Down About "Drag Queen Story Hour"
I've always loved drag queens, cartoon representations of womanhood by men, who exaggerate all the stuff of femininity.
I loved the drag queen on PeeWee Herman's old TV show, and I loved the drag queens on the West Side Highway and thereabouts in New York, who used to rate my outfits when I walked by.
It's also a thing I find endearingly amusing about Brits. Throw a costume party and invite a few people from the U.K., and at least one man will come in drag. Probably more.
Finally, first person I see getting it right on drag queens in recent days, per the brouhaha about "Drag Queen Story Hour." Andrew Sullivan writes at NYMag about this "a relatively new trend in which drag queens read kids stories in local libraries" that some are getting their panties in a bunch about (specifically, Sohrab Ahmari, "representing the Trumpian post-liberals."
Sullivan notes that Ahmari never managed to explain why "Drag Queen Story Hours are, in fact, a key symptom of the collapse of Western civilization, or, in Ahmari's astonishing description, 'demonic.'"
I assume Ahmari believes that drag queens are some kind of sexual thing, entirely inappropriate for children, and a vehicle for undermining sexual morality or childhood innocence or the sexual binary. Or they're all predatory pedophiles. Or something like that. Now I've never attended a DQSH (and I'll take a wild guess and suspect Ahmari hasn't either), but I do know a bit about drag queens. Up here in Provincetown, I live among them. And let me proffer the possibility that both French and Ahmari have no idea what they are talking about.In essence, drag queens are clowns. They are not transgender (or haven't been until very, very recently). They are men, mainly gay, who make no attempt to pass as actual women, and don't necessarily want to be women, but dress up as a caricature of a woman. Sure, some have bawdy names, and in the context of a late night gay bar, they can say some bawdy things. But they're not really about sex at all. They're about costume and play; their clothes and hair are exaggerated, over-the-top parodies of women's appearance; their makeup is often cray-cray, their wigs absurd. They also reinforce, rather than undermine, gender norms in a weird, over-the-top way. And they're supposed to be funny, surreal, larger-than-life. In Provincetown, where they walk the streets in full outfits in the light of day, they get a simple reaction from passing straights and families and children: first a look of surprise, then a little bewilderment, even embarrassment occasionally, but almost always followed by a giggle or a smile or a laugh. Then they want their picture taken with them. Quelle horreur!
Children love drag queens the way they love clowns or circuses or Halloween or live Disney characters in Disney World. It's dress-up fun. When my young niece and nephew, both under ten years old, came over to Ptown one year, I took them to see Dina Martina, a legendary comic master of the art. They loved it, laughed constantly through it, and were genuinely entertained. They were particularly amused when Dina turned around and she had back hair visible above her dress.
The idea that they were being exposed to anything sexual or inappropriate is absurd. When I was a kid in Britain, there was a tradition every Christmas, and there still is, of going to a pantomime, a campy theater production loosely based on a fairy-tale, where a central figure will be a man dressed up fantastically as a woman -- the Wicked Witch or the Evil Godmother or other misogynist grotesqueries. It's not a strip show, for Pete's sake. It's a laugh, designed for the entire family. And yes, Dave Chappelle, the sanest man in America at the moment, is right. Men dressed obviously as women are first and foremost funny.
So how on Earth is this a sign of the cultural apocalypse? These clowns read children's stories to kids and their parents, and encourage young children to read books. This is the work of the devil? Please.








> Children love drag queens the
> way they love clowns or circuses
> or Halloween or live Disney
> characters in Disney World.
Preposterous.
Sullivan is a blithe, twitching loon.
Crid at September 14, 2019 2:54 AM
This is just so fucked up.
> I assume Ahmari believes that
> drag queens are some kind of
> sexual thing
Why shouldn't he?
> In essence, drag queens
> are clowns.
Says who?
I think "Drag Queen Story Hour" is a fine thing to be annoyed or upset about. Maybe both.
Crid at September 14, 2019 3:20 AM
People in small towns in the Heartland don't want drag queen story hours in the public library. They're not against drag queens per se, but they're against drag queens reading to children in their particular small town.
I suspect drag queens reading to children is simply a metaphor for liberal east and left-coast values, and these small towns want nothing whatever to do with liberal east and left-coast values. No, they don't. Not at all. The drag queens also serve as a metaphor for how the left constantly seeks to impose its values on the unwilling.
Leander, Texas, a suburb of Austin, was compelled to rent a meeting room in their library for drag-queen story hour. The Leander City Council was not happy, especially since they had to foot the bill for the extra security. As I predicted to my wife, they simply closed the library meeting rooms to everyone, including a small church without a sanctuary of their own. They'll be using the meeting rooms for storage.
Liberals just don't get it.
roadgeek at September 14, 2019 5:24 AM
As a kid, I never liked any of those things - except Halloween. Loved Halloween. Hated costumed characters who tried too hard to engage me. Was creeped out by clowns and bored by circuses.
Why do you think so many horror movies involve clowns? Children are creeped out by clowns - It (Pennywise), the clown scene in Potergeist, Batman's Joker, John Wayne Gacy, etc. Clowns are creepy.
A 2008 English study revealed that very few children actually like clowns:
"We found that clowns are universally disliked by children. Some found them quite frightening and unknowable."
"Very few children like clowns. They are unfamiliar and come from a different era. They don't look funny, they just look odd."
You were an adult. To an adult, exaggerated dress-up is campy whereas to a child, it's creepy.
I'm still trying to figure out how drag queens and children's story hour got combined in the first place. Seems kinda forced - like someone trying create something that will piss off the hick in the sticks; that will draw out Republicans and evangelicals.
Conan the Grammarian at September 14, 2019 8:13 AM
They tried this in Houston but had to shut it down bc the guy who started the program, and at least one other drag queen, turned out to be convicted pedophiles. Additionally, there is a most definitely a sexual component to drag queens. I just read a piece in Medium last week by a guy who does drag and is uncomfortable with drag being taken over by children. So, no this isn’t just harmless fun and you don’t have be a parent or a religious nut to oppose it.
Sheep Mom at September 14, 2019 8:29 AM
> trying create something that
> will piss off the hick in the
> sticks
Absolutely, absolutely. You're correct.
But for fucked-up-edness of this magnitude, I detect an enormous amount of simple naivete as well. It's the kind of thing we've seen from Patrick a hundred times over the years. He'll pout and scream and throw his strained carrots because the rest of us won't admit that we secretly know exactly what he's talking about and have exactly the same responses... He's got far too much invested in his fantasies —borne perhaps of abject loneliness— that his weepy, sullen heart is the concentric center of the human experience.
That's exactly the vibe of idiocy i detect in the passage Amy's cited. (Perhaps Pat & Andy have other thins in common.)
"Children love drag queens"? That's over-the-top demented. A crushingly solitary, socialization-crippling childhood is the most generous excuse imaginable for such a presumption.
Whatever such people say about diversity, the magnitude of their eager detachment tells us so very much more.
Crid at September 14, 2019 8:46 AM
I mean, there's an infinitely larger body of evidence to suggest that children naturally "love" handguns and firearms of all types… But who'd bother to ask Sullivan if he agrees?
Crid at September 14, 2019 8:48 AM
What Roadgeek said. You want to do this in New York or LA, whatever. But respect people who don't want it.
Both Sullivan and Ahmari are loons. No this isn't the end of civilization and no it isn't harmless. Just leave people alone who want to be left alone. This is exhibit a million and something of why you got Trump. And why the next Republican president will be a Trump knockoff.
Ben at September 14, 2019 9:42 AM
Funny the things different eras try to keep away from kids. I woke up this morning remembering a short story I first read in an old anthology when I was a preteen called *Dead Men on Parade*, Googled it . Author Irving Crump from BoysLife Magazine 1929.
I read it mid 60s in an anthology called Ghosts,Ghosts from my ELEMENTARY school library.Very
creepy. Summary: deep sea diver, helmet, boots, airhose type recoverng shipwreck victims from inside a sunken freighter and cuurents make 5 corpses follow him. Might not be the creepiest story in the book.
Point: this was appropriate children's reading up through at least the 1970s. Today there would be parents trying to get everyone from the librarian, the child's teacher, the principal,to probably the district superintendent fired in retaliation for their delicate child's damage.
Two BTWs: boys AND girls read for pleasure then and
I taught elementary school off and on (time with my own children as a SAHM) from 1980 to 2012 and there have always been crazy and/or completely uninterested parents That's how I see most of these online lynch mob leaders-from a safe distance.
Mostly lurks at September 14, 2019 9:56 AM
Today there would be parents trying to get everyone from the librarian, the child's teacher, the principal,to probably the district superintendent fired in retaliation for their delicate child's damage.
_____________________________________
Does that mean you can't find Edgar Allan Poe's stories in an elementary school library these days? I'll be surprised, if so.
lenona at September 14, 2019 11:10 AM
Nerp. My kid ain’t seeing a drag queen. We have conversations that come up about boys marrying boys and girls marrying girls. That is difficult enough that I can’t even imagine the shitstorm of questions that would follow such a spectacle (and it is just that. A spectacle). All of which would
Involve her (or really any kid) asking questions that would lead to a discussion about “whhhhyyy” they do this or that. I’m finding it hard for my parental brain to bypass the conversation about what these people’s lives look like and how this is about who has sex with who.
And just so we are clear. Most kids hate clowns. My kid does. I did. My husband does. They aren’t allowed in our house.
Feebie at September 14, 2019 11:52 AM
Homosexuals are more likely to abuse children then heterosexuals.
Homosexuals are more likely to have been abused in the past than heterosexuals
This is why people are weary with the gay stuff promoted to kids. The born this way meme was a lie.
The same people who promote drag queen story time promote actual drag kids which is obviously sexual abuse.
Liberals promote this stuff because they want to increase the number of trans and gay kids.
I supported gay rights in the nineties but the Christians turned out to be right. The gay rights movement is coming for the kids.
Also slluvens take is as usual stupid. If drag queens are just clowns why not scrap drag queen story time and have clown story time? The left clearly wants to introduce children to sexual deviants.
Zinc Hammer at September 14, 2019 12:17 PM
You know what the difference is between a circus and political/cultural indoctrination?
At the Circus you are encouraged to point and laugh.
If this would not be the case at drag queen story hour, it isn’t a circus. It is force fed “defining deviancy down”.
Isab at September 14, 2019 12:44 PM
I think EA Poe may be safe but Mark Twain definitely is not.
I doubt anyone below high school is reading Poe. And to be clear I seriously doubt that most of the complaining types are reading much of anything.
Mostly lurks at September 14, 2019 12:53 PM
So you can't find "Tom Sawyer" at the school library if you're in 4th grade?
It wouldn't surprise me TOO much (that book is clearly racist in a way that "Huck Finn" is not, but I don't remember hearing that the former is commonly banned).
At any rate, "The Tell-Tale Heart" is pretty scary - and easy enough to read.
By "complaining types," I assume you mean the parents and not kids who hate to read anything?
lenona at September 14, 2019 1:36 PM
Andrew Sullivan?
Is this the same "clown" (see what I did there? Sullivan isn't even a drag queen; but, he is a clown) who claimed that Palin was not the mother of her son Trig? But, in fact, claimed that Palin was covering for her daughter Bristol who Sullivan claimed was the real mother?
IMO, not much of what he has to say is of any value. He turned into an asshat a few years back; so, now like I wish Hillary would do is that he would just shut up and go away.
charles at September 14, 2019 8:26 PM
Eight-year-old drag queen "Queen Lactacia" posing with an adult drag queen:
https://triggerreset.files.wordpress.com/2019/01/lactatianew.jpg?w=900
Ken R at September 15, 2019 4:14 AM
Eleven-year-old drag queen dances in a bar while men cheer and whistle and give him dollar bills. Would it be OK if an eleven-year-old girl dances like this in a bar while adult men whistle and cheer and give her dollar bills?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=majcQ54vlDs
Ken R at September 15, 2019 5:11 AM
Ten-year-old drag queen: Just an innocent child dressing up as a clown? This child performs in bars for the pleasure of adult men.
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2018/01/02/16/47B3758000000578-5228857-Amazing_Desmond_Napoles_10_from_Brooklyn_New_York_City_has_found-m-36_1514911647423.jpg
Ken R at September 15, 2019 5:39 AM
The purpose of drag queen story hour is to "capture the imagination and play of the gender fluidity of childhood" and "give kids... unabashedly queer role models."
https://www.dragqueenstoryhour.org/
Role model: a person looked to by others as an example to be imitated.
In other words, to exploit the impressionability of young children so that the things in the previous three posts become common and acceptable.
Ken R at September 15, 2019 5:45 AM
You attract an awful lot of social conservatives to your blog, don't you? Where are all the libertarians?
Dan T. at September 15, 2019 7:58 AM
— Reporting for duty.
Crid at September 15, 2019 8:11 AM
I’m not sure what that crack about social conservatives is supposed to mean, but here is a link to the Medium article. Please read the final paragraph, where the gay man makes a solid case that the world should include adult spheres for adult things and child friendly spheres for children. I agree with him. The whole thing is worth reading.
https://medium.com/@kevan.copeland/do-children-belong-in-drag-culture-12376e1b7334
Sheep Mom at September 15, 2019 8:49 AM
I’m not sure what that crack about social conservatives is supposed to mean, but here is a link to the Medium article. Please read the final paragraph, where the gay man makes a solid case that the world should include adult spheres for adult things and child friendly spheres for children. I agree with him. The whole thing is worth reading.
https://medium.com/@kevan.copeland/do-children-belong-in-drag-culture-12376e1b7334
Sheep Mom at September 15, 2019 8:50 AM
Dan T.
Where are all the libertarians?
----------------------------------
Who says libertarians agree with child abuse?
In unguarded moments, drag queen participants have used the word "grooming" to describe what they are doing.
In another incident, photos emerged of kids encouraged to hug and loll about with their drag queen story-tellers - and then the photos were quickly thrown down the media memory hole.
Time to wake up.
It was never about liberating anyone, it was about destroying the family.
Marxist-socialist thinkers always said that the family and religion were barriers to the power of the state. They said they would do this, then they went and did it.
Similarly, feminism began as a "liberation" movement - but it's mostly liberated children from the stability of fathers, while making women dependent on social welfare (see, Marxist-socialist) - and is now asserting that all normal hetero sex is rape.
Never about "empowerment".
Never about "liberation".
Ben David at September 15, 2019 8:52 AM
So you can't find "Tom Sawyer" at the school library if you're in 4th grade?
______________________________________
But more importantly, can middle-schoolers get it at school? Or do book reports on it, if they choose?
Which is not to say that parents don't have an obligation to talk seriously and regularly with their kids about racism, so kids will recognize it and disapprove of it even when the parents aren't there, whether we're talking about classic novels or prejudiced playmates.
Btw, I showed a wonderful 1930s comedy to an 8-year-old boy who definitely appreciated it - especially the fiery, domineering Adolphe Menjou - but after watching another character, an illiterate comic thug (played by the Bronx-born Lionel Stander) he said something to the effect of "that has to be a black guy." I coldly said: "There are no black people in this movie."
(I wasn't about to give him a lecture on the issue, but I did tell his mother in private. I just wish I'd known in advance that Stander's family was Russian, since the boy's father is Russian.)
lenona at September 15, 2019 12:23 PM
http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/74
Tom Sawyer free at Gutenberg
Isab at September 15, 2019 4:20 PM
If the drag queens were simply reading Alice in Wonderland, I would just think they were funny people. But they're introducing these kids to rather mature concepts, such as gender confusion and sexuality questioning.
Child abuse.
mpetrie98 at September 15, 2019 5:09 PM
I'm sorry Gracious Hostess, but I think you are missing the problems with DQSH. First, Drag has always been understood only as an ADULT phenomenon. Whatever irony and camp underlie Drag, it's sensible only to adults and that's never been in question. Drag is burlesque, drag is adult, drag is usually performed along with at a minimum sexual innuendo and often with explicit raunchy material. Isn't the first question therefore, why is DQSH even a thing? Where on earth did this movement come from, full-sprung like Athena from the forehead of Zeus? Were children and their parents clamoring for more Drag? Nope. Instead, as noted above, DQSH is an organized movement with a mission statement as follows: The purpose of drag queen story hour is to "capture the imagination and play of the gender fluidity of childhood" and "give kids... unabashedly queer role models.
They have a freakin' mission statement that has nothing to do with some sort of coincidental fun cultural trend, as though libraries were suddenly presenting story hours given by readers dressed up as Beanie Babies or Pokemon characters. They want to be role models, they want kids to emulate them and question their gender/sex. They say so! Will you not take them at their word?
RigelDog at September 17, 2019 6:29 AM
Leave a comment