Map Out The Unintended (And Expensive) Consequences Of "Free!"
Michael T. Nietzel writes at Forbes about a plan by New Mexico for free college:
New Mexico is expected to announce today one of the nation's most ambitious free college plans. The proposal would cover tuition at all of the state's 29 public two-year and four-year colleges, and students would be eligible for the support regardless of their family income.The move still needs to be approved by New Mexico's legislature, but passage is expected. Both houses are controlled by Democrats. In a statement to the New York Times, New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham said, "This program is an absolute game changer for New Mexico. In the long run, we'll see improved economic growth, improved outcomes for New Mexican workers and families and parents."
With the program, New Mexico would become the latest state to join the movement, now involving about 20 states, of guaranteeing some form of tuition coverage for resident students. But its plan goes farther than many others. It is not restricted to two-year colleges, as is the case in Tennessee. It ignores family income, unlike Washington or New York, and pays the tuition for poor and rich students alike. The benefit would be available to recent high school graduates as well as adults seeking to return to school. And in what is a marked departure from other states, the New Mexico program is open to all state residents, regardless of their immigration status.
As in several other state plans, New Mexico's tuition coverage would kick in only after already existing state aid and federal Pell grants had been applied. One paradoxical impact of such an approach is that rich students will receive more state assistance than low-income students, many of whom will have much of their costs covered by Pell grants. All recipients would need to maintain a 2.5 grade point average.
Free college would surely increase the number of students going to college and going to college in New Mexico. Vastly, to say the least. Is it possible that this...might not be such a good thing on a number of levels?
The author's take:
As a policy, free-college, especially when extended to those who do not need the financial help, is subject to several questions. But it also makes the challenging - and welcome - statement that higher education is a public good, not just a private privilege. For that alone, it is a valuable initiative.








Two questions: a) Who's paying for this? Because "free" always has to be paid for, and b) How many of the newly minted graduates will be leaving New Mexico with their newly minted degree? New Mexico is a poor state and not exactly covered over with jobs for new college graduates.
roadgeek at September 19, 2019 3:26 AM
Like student loan mess, this will mushroom into a financial morass. When the money comes from having a large number of students enrolled, grading will be diluted so all students maintain at least a 2.5 GPA and their state funding. Schools will reduce admissions requirements to obtain the maximum number of students. Costs, unrestrained by market necessity of having consumers being willing to pay the attendant price for the product, will skyrocket. Whenever you put free money into a closed system, it distorts the market conditions that keep the system in check - risks, costs, etc. This will not end well.
Conan the Grammarian at September 19, 2019 3:46 AM
The other option is they will limit supply to match funding. So a fixed number of people will get a degree paid for by the state. After a few years those people will fall into two categories.
One, the highly credentialed. Rich people who got a good education and have the paperwork to back it up will get a government paid for degree.
Two, the politically connected. People who's story is good for buying politicians votes. People who are relatives of politicians. Big donors as well. Those people will get a government paid for degree.
Everyone else will be told to take a hike. The only question is will these state schools still permit people to pay with their own money to get a degree. In much of Europe you can't. I.e. the government gets to pick who does and who does not have a chance at a degree. Not on the politically favored list, too bad. No degree for you.
Ben at September 19, 2019 7:45 AM
Dear high school students,
Apply to the New Mexico college of your choice, get accepted, take a skip year, move to New Mexico, establish your residency, and then enter college.
I R A Darth Aggie at September 19, 2019 8:04 AM
So New Mexico state college degree is now the equivalent of a High School diploma?
The Former Banker at September 19, 2019 8:09 AM
There's gotta be a million strings attached to New Mexico's plan. Are they really going to pay for a bunch of people to get really useless degrees?
Old RPM Daddy (OldRPMDaddy at GMail dot com) at September 19, 2019 10:51 AM
If every taxpayer in New Mexico is on the hook to pay for the college education of New Mexico’s university students, will the state’s universities be allowed to turn away unqualified students? If not, what does the legislature think this will do to the quality of the state’s higher education?
What about out-of-state students? Will they get a free ride?
Conan the Grammarian at September 19, 2019 11:23 AM
I went to college in New Mexico more than 30 years ago. At the time, it appeared that the major state schools were all bottomless pits of admissions. Supposedly, where I went to school, all one had to do to be accepted was take the SAT or ACT. There was no minimum score requirement. This makes me wonder if they're going to now have to limit the number of new students and give preference to out of state students who will be paying those tuition fees.
When I went to college, I came across a lot of out of state students who said that the tuition there was far less than the tuition for the colleges in their home states. I'm pretty certain that's still true today.
Fayd at September 19, 2019 11:23 AM
This piece is more about slavery than education, but does touch on the actual price of "free stuff".
https://accordingtohoyt.com/2019/09/18/stop-the-slavers/
I R A Darth Aggie at September 19, 2019 1:17 PM
Tuition will be free. Meanwhile room and board will become mandatory and zoom to 25k a year.
Isab at September 19, 2019 3:55 PM
Yes, a number of schools have pulled that gag Isab.
Ben at September 19, 2019 4:02 PM
" will the state’s universities be allowed to turn away unqualified students? "
Why would they try? When every student becomes a virtual basket of free government money, with which to hire more faculty at higher pay, the only rational response is to grow the student body as quickly as possible. If any faculty see the insanity in this system, that only increases this perverse incentive because they want to amass as much money as possible with which to purchase canned goods and ammunition before civilization collapses.
Whether a course of action is rational is often a question of goals, incentives, and how best to achieve them.
bw1 at September 19, 2019 6:06 PM
This still won't work, because those who are looking for something which is "free" want to get something, not DO something.
Study? Why? My grades should be free!
Radwaste at September 20, 2019 4:37 AM
Leave a comment