NEw words will just rise to take their places.

Or maybe old words might make a comeback?

Etymologies of All the Old-Timey Synonyms For "Whore" Found in the Dungeon Masters Guide "Random Harlot Encounters" Table From the first edition DMG:

http://ace.mu.nu/archives/383887.php

Examples: trull, strumpet, trollop, wench, doxy.

More modern: cunt. Less modern: termagant, harpy, frump, cow, shrew, hellcat, bag. From the fine article:

Hunt (D-Dorchester) said he filed the bill upon request from a constituent, which will go before the Joint Committee on the Judiciary for a hearing Tuesday.

“Any time a constituent approaches me with something that is of concern to them, I follow through with it,” Hunt told the Herald. “In this instance, someone asked me to file a bill that they deemed was important and I thought it was a good exercise to let that bill go through the process.”

Hunt did not identify the constituent.

...

Hunt countered that if the bill violates the First Amendment, it’s still important to have conversations about what the existing law is.

I wonder if Rep. Hunt will personally foot the bill the state will be burdened with if the AG chooses to defend the bill? or is that a privilege reserved to the taxpayers? and what if the AG chooses to not defend the law? will Rep. Hunt call for their removal from office?

Somewhere, Sam and John Adams roll in their graves.

Also, would women who say bitch to other women be subject to this law? or is that OK, and only men would be subject to the law?

I suspect with a touch of selective enforcement only the politically disfavored would be subject to this law IRA. That could be a women depending on her politics.

"Any time a constituent who is pledging a lot of financial support for my campaign approaches me with something that is of concern to them, I follow through with it," Hunt told the Herald. "In this instance, someone with a lot of money and influence asked me to file a bill that they deemed was important and I thought it was a good exercise to let that bill go through the process."

You have to read between the lines.

Related:
https://fox61.com/2019/10/21/uconn-pd-identify-2-male-students-arrested-in-connection-to-racial-video/

Two male UConn students were arrested in connection to a viral racial slur video, according to UConn Spokesperson Stephanie Reitz.

Reitz said the two students were charged under CGS 53-37, ridicule on account of creed, religion, color, denomination, nationality or race.

That could be a women depending on her politics.

That's because conservative women are not really women. So I've been told.

People are losing their jobs because of a single word they said. This is insane. I swear sometimes but sure hope no one notices. The destruction of a person is also both random and selective at different times. Rappers can use the b and n words without consequence. The proper response to someone swearing is polite silence or changing the topic, not destroying their life.

Hunt is mistaken on why we elect representatives: not to do exactly what we say, but to represent us; to use judgment and discretion in governing the body politic - whether city, state, or country. If the whims of the public were to govern the country, it would be chaos.

Hunt countered that if the bill violates the First Amendment, it’s still important to have conversations about what the existing law is.

So, he has no qualms about proposing bills and having the legislature spend time debating them in order to "have conversations?" Nice stewardship of public funds there, guy.

Sorry, this part should have been in blockquote tags:

Hunt countered that if the bill violates the First Amendment, it’s still important to have conversations about what the existing law is.

"Somewhere, Sam and John Adams roll in their graves."

As are Everhard Annhauser and Augustus Busch - at the idea that anyone fond of their product would consider such a thing.

The proper response to someone swearing is polite silence or changing the topic, not destroying their life.
_______________________________________

Miss Manners wouldn't quite agree, I think. She says a good response is to ask "what does that mean?" In an innocent tone of voice. Chances are, if you do that every time, they'll get irritated enough to stop behaving that way when you're around. Even if the person was clearly trying to upset you or insult you.

(Can't find the column right now, but it's in one of her books.)