Give Incarcerated People Reason Not To Reoffend
I believe in giving people second chances, and when I was hiring an assistant/editor a few years back, one of those who applied was a woman who'd spent years struggling with addiction and was arrested for brandishing a bread knife at her husband while high on oxy.
She got the felony knocked down to a misdemeanor by following through with a judge's order to do "community labor," going out on Hollywood Boulevard with a work crew every day to sweep up poo and used condoms. This gave her a work ethic and showed her there was meaning to life through work. She got into a sober living house, babysat for the owner's child, started writing articles -- very honest articles about herself and her life -- and then she applied for the assistant/editor job with me.
I can say I believe in second chances, but that's just cheap shit talk unless I actually follow through. I always like to figure out the maximum level of disaster from any choice I might make. Worst case scenario, she'd change a check and steal money or disappear on my deadline days. If the check thing happened, the bank gives you back your money, and if she disappeared on my deadline day, I'd call Gregg and eat his brain (I mean, get him to help me make editorial choices and brainstorm the end of my column).
I hired her, loved her, mentored her, and refused to let her self-publish the book she wanted to write. She wrote a proposal and got an agent and he got her a really nice hardcover deal at Hachette: My Fair Junkie, by Amy Dresner. I was mama-bird proud.
And now, she's helping all these people get sober and stay sober through her work.
I thought of her when I read this op-ed at USA Today by Gerard Robinson about the benefits of postsecondary programs in prison:
Buried deep in Congress' latest COVID-19 relief deal is a provision that would allow the incarcerated the chance to better themselves, and their communities, through higher education.For almost 30 years, prisoners could use federal aid to pay for a college education. By 1993-94, 23,000 of the 4 million Pell Grant recipients who received a portion of the $6 billion program to pay for higher education were in prison. By that time an estimated 772 in-prison programs were operational inside1,287 correctional facilities in the United States.
But the infamous 1994 Crime Bill, which Biden proudly authored, banned such aid for prisoners' education. Biden was not alone; the majority of the Congressional Black Caucus voted in favor of doubling down on mass incarceration and mandatory minimum sentences through the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994.
...A RAND Corporation study found that incarcerated people who participate in correctional education have a 43% lower likelihood of returning to prison and 13% higher odds of post-release employment than those who do not.
...And, contrary to myths about giving a Pell Grant to prisoners, free-world college students will not lose out on any federal aid to someone in prison.
Companies like the American Prison Data Systems are poised to use online technology platforms to offer education to incarcerated students and prison personnel alike. Alumni and students of in-prison college programs -- be it the Bard Prison Initiative, Historically Black Colleges and Universities offering degrees in prison, or the five community colleges in the Second Chance Pell Program in Virginia -- will obtain an opportunity to champion the benefits of this program.
...At a point in American history when partisanship and distrust of each other's motives have clouded our views about Congress, this bold bipartisan decision to lift the Pell Grant eligibility ban is a crucial step forward in rebuilding political trust and preparing the 95% of people who will leave prison one day to reenter society.
For us all, including prisoners, the New Year is a time of reflection and redemption. Now it is up to us to see that the incarcerated can make good on their resolutions when they return to society.








I have a friend who used to be an IBM employee back in the day. One of his responsibilities was to drive all over Texas and repair the computers deliberately broken by inmates at the prisons. It was more interesting to most of them to have the computer guy show up, and interrupt the monotony of their daily routine, than actually use the computers for their intended purpose.
I also suspect that these statistics aren’t measuring what you think they are. Smarter and better educated criminals are less likely to get caught and also more likely to find a way to stay out of the system. A 13 percent increase in employability is almost within the margin or error.
In general, education is not a magic bullet. Former criminals are unlikely to be employed in many high trust/high wage jobs for the obvious reasons.
Isab at January 9, 2021 3:44 AM
While I will argue that poverty does not cause crime, I think education at least offers prisoners some shot at redemption and should be on offer to prisoners.
The behavioral outlook of most people who end up in prison is not likely to be changed by having a degree. In prison, the process of getting an education itself provides a break from an otherwise very monotonous routine. Once out, however, the distractions and temptations of outside life return front and center.
Thomas Dalrymple (pen-name of Anthony Daniels) has written a very interesting book on this from his perspective as a psychiatrist in the UK, Life at the Bottom. He writes of his experience working in an NHS hospital in one of London's poorer neighborhoods and in a British prison. He contrasts that experience with his experience working as a doctor in some of the poorest countries in Africa. It's worth a read.
Bad habits become ingrained when you grow up poor. Longterm poverty is a mindset, not a circumstance, and it's a very difficult mindset to escape.
Conan the Grammarian at January 9, 2021 7:26 AM
Coney— A favorite recent tweet from Henderson on such things:
I like it, as a tweet with cites, because it coheres to the experience of myself and friends. (I like Daniels a lot, but how many studies from Ellis did you make time for last year? Same here.)Crid at January 9, 2021 5:17 PM
Gee, great - like this hasn't been watched by wardens and police for decades.
I am sure that a bedazzled smartphone knows more about this. Right?
I suggest that the time for, er, education of some kind must occur before incarceration - and that this education does NOT consist of showing the student that Daddy Government is the source of all food, shelter and money.
Radwaste at January 9, 2021 5:38 PM
Unreadable, because you pack not one, not two, but three levels of sarcasm into every clause of every sentence. Back! Forth! No, back again! No, really, back again, no... Yeah! Forth to the backles! Was there something you wanted to share?
Crid at January 10, 2021 7:28 AM
So, dood, I get it - you're out.
Radwaste at January 11, 2021 12:36 PM
You respond with sarcasm, willfully disregarding the satire in your cite.
Can you understand why all these extra layers of contradiction leave your meaning unclear?
Make your point, okay? Then have some fun: Sex jokes, insults, puns, pop songs… But make your point.
Crid at January 11, 2021 2:56 PM
Leave a comment