Biden's Ideologically-Driven Corporate Welfare Plan
Aadi Golchha writes at FEE about the new $2.3 trillion "infrastructure" plan President Biden just unveiled -- "a shockingly large portion" of which is actually unrelated to infrastructure:
The plan includes massive subsidies for corporations as well as state and local governments, and comes right after the administration's proposed increase in the corporate tax rate, which would raise the rate from 21 percent to 28 percent.There's $300 billion for manufacturing, $100 billion for electric utilities, $100 billion for broadband, $174 billion for electric vehicles, and a whole lot more. A significant portion of this spending is directed at subsidizing big corporations.
What the plan overlooks is that corporations are already investing heavily in the industries they aim to subsidize. For example, companies like Tesla and Volkswagen have invested billions into developing electric automobiles and charging infrastructure. Biden's plan would aim to influence consumer spending decisions through the creation of further incentives for such vehicles. In other words, these companies would see their profits boosted as a result of artificially increased demand. The same goes for Verizon and T-Mobile that have invested in broadband, and Mitsubishi and Siemens that have invested in wind energy.
Subsidizing multi-billion dollar corporations and pumping up their profits is corporate welfare, not an infrastructure plan. The private sector built hundreds of thousands of gas stations across the country, and if there is demand for it, they will do the same with charging stations for EVs. A federal takeover of business investment decisions in this manner will inevitably have repercussions.
...The current administration is betting that damage caused by jacking up taxes will be outweighed by the massive amount of federal spending in this proposal. As the president of the Tax Foundation, Scott A. Hodge put it, "Based on CBO's (Congressional Budget Office) assessment of the economic and budgetary effects of federal investment, there is no reason to believe that the economy will be better off with such a trade."
The CBO estimates that $2 trillion in federal spending will yield about $1.3 trillion in actual investment. Since government investment only results in half the returns of private investment, we would be much better off if the $2 trillion in corporate tax increases that Biden needs to fund this plan were left in the hands of the private sector.








Well Obama infrastructure bill was partially payoffs to unions and retirement plans, Teachers are infrastructure. Have been hearing how almost everything is infrastructure. Wondering if CNN is infrastructure?
Joe j at April 19, 2021 5:00 AM
The belief that this kind of government spending creates any true long term economic benefit is as much as a fairy-tale as "trickle-down" tax theory. In fact, it's almost the same story line, just with different characters.
ruralcounsel at April 19, 2021 5:18 AM
There are no infrastructure projects in the US that are sitting around waiting for money. 'Shovel ready' doesn't exist. The US doesn't have a funding issue. It has a permission issue. It takes so long just to get permission for any infrastructure project that by the time you actually get permission to start you've already had a decade or two to find the money for it.
So yeah Biden's infrastructure bill isn't about infrastructure. Same with Obama's.
Ben at April 19, 2021 5:32 AM
Most of the money earmarked for "shovel ready" projects will be spent on consultants and not on groundbreaking or actual construction.
Conan the Grammarian at April 19, 2021 6:32 AM
Leave a comment