Early Communist Utopia: Like An HOA For Vegans Who Hate Fun
Author Louisa May Alcott got dragged off to one of these, writes Lawrence W. Reed at FEE:

Louisa May Alcott's Little Women was published more than a century and a half ago--in 1868--and all these decades later, it remains a popular novel. What the author's many fans may not know is that as a young girl, Alcott learned firsthand just how ridiculous a utopian socialist commune is.

Alcott was just 11 when her father moved the family to the experimental village of Fruitlands in Massachusetts. It was not a promising place. Elizabeth Dunn at History.com writes,

Fruitlands was founded in Harvard, Massachusetts, as a self-sufficient farming community by Charles Lane and Bronson Alcott, two men with no practical experience in either farming or self-sufficiency...Settlers were forbidden to eat meat, consume stimulants, use any form of animal labor, create artificial light, enjoy hot baths or drink anything but water. Lane's ideas later evolved to include celibacy within marriage, which caused no small amount of friction between him and his most loyal disciple, Bronson Alcott, who had relocated his wife and four daughters [Louisa being one of them] to Fruitlands in a characteristic fit of enthusiasm.

At least 119 utopian, communal or socialist settlements were founded in the early 1800s in America. As most of the country reveled in newly won freedoms and a market economy that allowed the enterprising to create wealth, a few malcontents sought a different life. They spurned private property in favor of sharing material things in common. They preferred a "planned" community over the supposed "chaos" of the market's spontaneous order. They thought if they just worked out on paper what their preferred society would look like, everything and everybody would just fall into place.

Um...nuh-uh. Some of the practices:

From its inception in 1843, Fruitlands and its visionaries Lane and Alcott marinated in the half-baked, socialist abstractions that doomed it to failure:

Lofty pledges of equality that fell far short of reality. Women, for instance, were promised they would have to work no harder or longer than men, but the Alcott girls were among the Fruitlands women who were stuck with most of the labor.

Goofy, fringe notions about life. At Fruitlands, these notions included a general abstinence not only from sex but from most of what its architects regarded as "worldly activities"--like most commerce and trade, the raising of livestock, and the planting of vegetables that grow down (like turnips and carrots) instead of up (like lettuce and tomatoes).

A weird disdain for private property. The mere desire to acquire property for oneself (even by serving others as customers) was regarded as repugnant. Lane and Alcott once visited a nearby settlement of Shakers and while admiring the Shakers' practice of property held "in common," they condemned them for engaging in commerce by selling their homemade furniture.

These communities all disappeared -- none lasting as much as a decade. Fruitland? Seven months -- and kaput.

Reed is right:

Perhaps that lousy track record is the reason socialists don't practice "voluntary" socialism today, preferring to dragoon people into their plans by coercion. That's a rather sad commentary, isn't it? Ideas so bad that because they flop when tried freely, they must be imposed at the point of a gun. What could go wrong?