No Child Left Behind
Well, except for the poor black ones. At least, that's the way it goes in Weldon, NC, according to a Washington Post story by Michael Dobbs:
Nelson Edwards is unhappy with the education his daughters are receiving at Weldon Middle School, which has failed to meet federal standards. But help should be on the way: The No Child Left Behind law gives the Winn-Dixie meat cutter the option of transferring his children to a better-performing school.At least, that is the theory of one part of the most sweeping educational reforms adopted by Congress in more than a generation. The practice, from the perspective of a poor, overwhelmingly African American school district in North Carolina, is rather different.
A few months ago, Weldon school officials attempted to negotiate a school-choice agreement with their counterparts in Roanoke Rapids, a predominantly white, middle-class school district on the other side of Interstate 95. They were turned down flat.
Weldon's request would "create an administrative nightmare," said Roanoke Rapids school Superintendent John Parker, who employs two investigators to ensure that children living in Weldon and surrounding Halifax County do not try to sneak into his schools. "There is no way we could accommodate all the students who want to come here, if we opened our doors."
An administrative nightmare? Silly me, I thought that was precisely what "No Child Left Behind" was supposed to prevent: Give kids -- all kids -- access to adequate education -- and they might contribute something to society -- instead of contributing to the pile of papers on social services employees' desks.







I have some reservations about current approaches to school choice/vouchers. I just don't see how substandard schools will improve if all of the really vocal, dissatisfied parents pull their children out. Of course, those parents are just looking out for their own kids, and that's admirable. But from a policy perspective, we need those dissatisfied parents to apply pressure on behalf of all the students, because the kids who are left behind in the lousy, under-funded schools are basically stuck on a slowly sinking ship during a really critical period for learning in their lives. I would rather see a substandard school shut down immediately, with all students being transferred elsewhere.
(A much more sophisticated description of these concerns can be found in "Exit, Voice, and Loyalty" by Albert Hirchman.)
Lena has a headache at December 23, 2003 11:12 PM
Very good point, Lena. And giving all kids access to adequate education really does mean making all schools adequate -- not giving rich kids a good education and giving the finger to poor ones.
Amy Alkon at December 24, 2003 9:21 AM