Love Knows No Boundaries
(Provided you aren't gay.) If you're an American man in love with a Canadian man, you've got problems, writes Ben Smith in Reason:
One of the reasons weíre supposed to care less about gay marriage than about black civil rights is that the stakes are so much lower today. Then it was about what might be called basic freedoms to live and work. Now itís about secondary rights such as inheritance and health care, things that can be addressed by contract law. As Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) said in a February presidential debate, at the center of the gay marriage debate is "terminology."Tell that to David Kloss. In the summer of 2001, the 54-year-old oil exploration manager made a terrible mistake: He fell in love with a Canadian. Soon, he faced a choice shared by thousands of American citizens: Leave the man he loved, or leave the country.
The source of the dilemma is federal immigration law, which is based on the seemingly innocuous principle of "family reunification." Klossí partner, Remi Collette, 35, moved to San Francisco to join him. But Collette was officially a tourist. He couldnít work legally, and he couldnít stay indefinitely. If Kloss and Collette had been a straight couple, they would have counted as a "family." Getting papers and eventually citizenship would have been a routine, bureaucratic process. As gays, they faced a stark choice: break the law with illegal work or a sham heterosexual marriage, or join the diaspora of self-described "love exiles."
"You go through life, you think youíre American, you think youíre in the land of the free," Kloss says. "Then suddenly I come to a situation where Remi couldnít stay, and my country says you either have to give up the man you love or get out."
A group that represents cross-border gay and lesbian couples, Immigration Equality, estimates that there are more than 25,000 such couples in the United States. Many break the law. They place advertisements like this one in The Washington Blade, a gay paper: "Marriage-Minded GWM/GAM couple (1 American, 1 foreign), seeks lesbian couple (1 American, 1 foreign) for marriages of mutual interests."
Thatís a risky move, however, one that carries penalties of imprisonment and deportation. So in 2002 Kloss sold his beloved house in the center of San Francisco, with its view of the Marin headlands, and moved with Collette to Toronto. Last year they were married under Canadian law, which allows gays to bring in partners.
Kloss was lucky to have even that choice. If the partner doesnít hail from one of the countries with such a policy (which also include the United Kingdom, Israel, and several European states), gay couples find themselves perpetual tourists, insecure and unemployable.
Representative Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) has introduced a bill, called The Permanent Partners Immigration Act, to remedy the situation. In our current neo-Puritan landscape, I think saying it has a snowball's chance in hell of passing -- is exceedingly generous.







The Goddess Writes: "Representative Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) has introduced a bill, called The Permanent Partners Immigration Act, to remedy the situation. In our current neo-Puritan landscape, I think saying it has a snowball's chance in hell of passing -- is exceedingly generous."
Too true. Although eventually, we'll have no choice but to capitulate. As long as other countries allow gay marriages, it's only a matter of time when the courts recognize this as discrimination, much like the SC did with the repeal of the sodomy laws.
Patrick at June 16, 2004 11:18 AM
For Canadian immigration information for same-sex partners, check out LEGIT's website at www.legit.ca. Marriage is not a requirement for a Canadian to sponsor her/his s-s partner.
deb at August 27, 2004 10:52 PM