Who's Paying For The War?
Well, in part, soldiers and the families of the soldiers fighting it, writes Patt Morrison in the LA Times:
The price of war ó the White House budget office figures that for the Iraq conflict it's $175 billion and counting. But it's the little numbers right here in California that really get to Mike Ryan.Ryan is a respiratory therapist who lives in West L.A., and he didn't even own a cellphone until his son Rick went to Iraq in March as an Army combat medic. Enter the phone bills: $120, $140 a month, a hundred or two more put on the plastic to "charge up" Rick's phone card. A single call just after Rick landed in Iraq ran $130.
Then there's the food and the cost of sending it. Rick's not keen on Army cooking (who is?). "We brought him up eating well," said his father. So twice a month, a package leaves the Ryan house for Iraq ó Trader Joe's fruits and nuts, protein drinks, canned salmon. Sixty or 70 bucks' worth of food, times two, plus $25 for postage, times two again. Almost $200 a month more.
As the war warmed up, stories abounded about how much it was costing military families to keep reaching out to touch their loved ones. There were tales of disconnection notices because of unpaid bills. A Massachusetts soldier racked up a $7,600 phone bill; his entire savings account paid just half. Arizona Sen. John McCain sponsored a bill that gives those in combat access to a free monthly calling card worth $40. Which goes only so far, as Ryan can attest. Last October, in Colorado, a soldier's wife was applauded when she stood up at a town hall meeting and asked Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld about the ruinous cost of phone calls. "As enlisted soldiers," she said, "we can't afford this."
For a while, Mike Ryan worked overtime to pay his overseas phone bills. Then, his cousin, an Army Reserve coordinator, put him on to a military website selling phone cards.
It's run by the same people who've been selling goods to the military for 109 years, through PXs and now websites. They buy phone cards wholesale from AT&T, which holds the contract, and sell them to soldiers with a "small margin to cover costs and overhead."
It works out to $39 for 139 minutes, which has helped, said Ryan. But for families that don't know about the website and may be calling soldiers via other means (different companies' phone cards, for example), the phone bills are likely to be much bigger.
Not that the Mike Ryans of the world begrudge their kids the cost. "I would have paid 10 bucks a minute," he said.
But those bills, those relentless bills, and for families living on a military paycheck of $2,000 or $3,000 a month. The soldiers weren't drafted, of course; they signed up by choice, and they and their families will make do.
With his own hard bills to pay, Mike Ryan can't help but think about that other figure, the one in the billions of dollars. It makes him wonder about the profits being made on phone cards or on feeding his son in Iraq.
It leaves him thinking it's soldiers' families that are paying to subsidize this war, a couple of hundred dollars and a care package at a time: "When you think of Halliburton and Bechtel and how they've pretty much opened [Iraq] up to free enterprise Ö. [Can] American companies come in there and profiteer off the soldiers?"
Sure they can! Because our cowboy president only pretends to care about the common man. Pretend concern only goes so far.







Patt Morrison's pretty sexy, i think -- fancy hat, fancy birthmark and all. As bright and articulate as our own Amy. Plus I believe she knows how to cook :-)
But we don't see eye to eye. I once berated her, in a good-natured way, for one of her columns. Some guy had come up to her at a gas station and casually asked if she'd like to go to bed with him. Patt was outraged, she reported. "What a goddam nerve! He was way too young for me, what was he thinking??" [1]
I couldn't go along with that, no no. As we all know, he who never asks never gets. George Bernard Shaw wrote more powerfully than I ever could about the fundamental right to make straightforward propositions. I wrote to Patt's newspaper that I hoped, the next time Patt herself was in the mood for a random shag, the object of her lust treated her with more polite consideration. She probably never even read the comment, and certainly wouldn't have reformed her thinking on the point.
[1] Approximate quote, from memory
Stu "El InglÈs" Harris at August 28, 2004 4:55 PM
In my book, one should get irate only when the shagging offers (random or non-) stop coming in.
Amy Alkon at August 28, 2004 6:48 PM
Damn straight. That's why I'm so irate.
LYT at August 29, 2004 12:46 AM
Dear Amy,
I personally know the West L.A. Respiratory Therapist, Mike Ryan, cited as the "father" in the August 25 Op-Ed piece "Pricey War for Grunt's Families" by Patt Morrison.
The facts are:
Mike Ryan does not have any children!
Ryan's claim that he has a son in Iraq is an insidious LIE !!!
The army medic Mr. Ryan contemptibly refers to as his "son" is my nephew. Mike Ryan is a family acquaintance that made this up in order to promote his view of the War on Terror. The allegations attributed to my nephew never came from him - He is PROUD to serve and has never complained about his service to our country.
I don't care where anyone stands politically, freedom to disagree is a wonderful thing, but the premise of this story is a shameless LIE !!!
I wrote a letter to the LA Times to have them correct the record but I guess they are not interested in the TRUTH of the matter and people can now go around creating fake families in order to lend a "personal side" to their stories to entice readers to believe their propaganda. There is much more to this story than meets the eye and it reflects more on the left's willingness to print ANYTHING in order to promote their agenda. I personally don't believe anything Mike Ryan says. I mean come on - what kind of unscrupulous person goes around submitting stories to major newspapers claiming to be other peoples father??? Pretend stories only go so far !!
Thanks,
Uncle Dave
Uncle Dave at September 18, 2004 11:22 AM