The War Against People In Pain
Millions of Americans are being undertreated for pain, writes Maia Szalavitz, in Reason, thanks to prescription painkillers becoming the new frontline in the drug war. Doctors are being treated as suspected drug dealers -- simply for treating their patients in pain as their training has them see medically fit:
Frank Fisher seems to have been targeted based on just this sort of suspicion. At his Northern California clinic, the Harvard Medical School graduate accepted patients on Medicaid and Medi-Cal (California's health insurance for the poor) that most other physicians refused, and he tried to treat their pain as aggressively as he would treat anyone else's. In February 1999 state law enforcement agents raided Fisher's clinic and arrested him for drug dealing, fraud and murder. His bail was set at $15 million. State prosecutors accused him of "creating a public health epidemic" of OxyContin abuse and death. They implied that he must be a drug dealer because he was the largest prescriber of the drug under Medi-Cal.But in a context where fear of prosecution leads most doctors to under-prescribe, anyone who prescribes what is necessary for severe pain will be a top prescriber. Even Burke admits that prosecuting doctors has a chilling effect on their colleagues' treatment decisions.
"I know from lecturing thousands of physicians that there is no question but that it does," he says. "The thing we don't want to happen is that physicians don't prescribe appropriately because of these cases, but I know that it happens. I have to be honest." Burke also recognizes that there is no ceiling on opioid doses: When patients develop tolerance, they may need massive doses that would kill someone who had never taken the drug. "Physicians should not be targeted simply on volume," he says. "That can be a huge mistake."
The DEA insists physicians aren't targeted based on volume alone. But Fisher believes he was. While patients with moderate pain can be treated effectively with low doses of opioids, he explains, severe pain requires that the dose be adjusted ("titrated") to a level that maximizes pain relief and minimizes side effects. "To get a sense," he says, "I titrated about two dozen patients, and they ended up taking almost half of the OxyContin 80-milligram pills prescribed in California in 1998. What that tells you is that nobody else titrated."
Fisher was jailed for five months, during which time the prosecution's case began to evaporate. First, the murder charges were reduced to manslaughter by the judge, who saw no proof of intent. Then the truth about these "killings" came out. One death involved a passenger who died when her spine was severed in a van accident. Fisher was charged with her "murder" because she had high levels of OxyContin in her blood. Another "victim" had taken drugs stolen from a patient, while a third died of a self-administered overdose two weeks after Fisher was incarcerated.
During cross-examination in pretrial hearings, it was revealed that seven attempts by undercover agents to get drugs from Fisher had been rebuffed. "I had a screening process for those who tried to get controlled substances," he says. "I screened out 60 percent of those, and apparently the agents were amongst them."
In January 2003, four years after Fisher's arrest, a state judge dismissed all the charges against him because prosecutors had tried repeatedly to delay the trial. But this year prosecutors decided to pursue another set of charges against him. Instead of homicide, drug dealing, and felony fraud involving $2 million in Medi-Cal reimbursements, they charged him with eight misdemeanor counts of fraud. Prosecutors would not put a dollar value on the offenses, but Fisher said they added up to $150. The jury agreed with Fisher's expert, who said the billings in question didn't warrant civil penalties, let alone criminal charges, and he was acquitted of all counts in May. He still faces possible disciplinary action by the state medical board as well as civil suits by patients' relatives.
Fisher forwarded an e-mail message from a juror who wrote: "Now that I am home and can read about you on the Internet, my heart really goes out to you...I was upset that the prosecutor wasted my time and the court's time on such a weak case. But now that I know what you have really been through I feel embarrassed and selfish to be thinking about my own time. I hope you can reopen your clinic some day and get back to practicing medicine...Thanks for doing the job most doctors won't."
Typical to the current administration (Cheney takes babysteps to pay lip service to gay rights because he has a gay daughter), only when somebody in the immediate Bush/Cheney families suffers pain might others also have their suffering alleviated. Maybe then they'll let the doctors out of jail. Next on the agenda...the pot-heads! Excuse me, but it makes about as much sense to have a law against smoking pot as it would to have a law against drinking martinis. Oh wait...we did have a law against drinking martinis. And look how far we haven't come! Come on, it's been a few hundred years since the Puritans docked here...can't we move on?







"Too many whites are getting away with drug use. Find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them, and send them up the river." -- Rush Limbaugh
eric at September 9, 2004 12:30 PM
This story isn't about the war on drugs. It's about health care fraud.
"Frank Fisher [...] accepted patients on Medicaid and Medi-Cal (California's health insurance for the poor)"
First of all, Medi-Cal IS Medicaid in California. That's what we call our Medicaid program here. To say "Medicaid and Medi-Cal" -- as if they were two separate programs -- exposes a good bit of ignorance.
"he tried to treat their pain as aggressively as he would treat anyone else's."
This isn't helping Medicaid recipients if he's treating everyone else's pain inappropriately too.
"anyone who prescribes what is necessary for severe pain will be a top prescriber."
There is NO CONSENSUS on "what is necessary" for treating this incredibly VAGUE condition the writer calls "severe pain." Another word for it is "withdrawal." There are a lot of junkies with Medicaid coverage.
"When patients develop tolerance, they may need massive doses that would kill someone who had never taken the drug."
They might also need other forms of treatment -- like surgery!
To take this story seriously, I'd need to see A LOT more attention given to the problem of Medicaid fraud. I've heard numerous stories of physicians treating Medicaid patients for pain indefinitely because of they way they are reimbursed for these services. Yes, the Medicaid reimbursement rate is disgustingly low, but if you churn enough patients through your practice, it can be quite lucrative. In the commercial health insurance sector, most patients are covered under "capitation" (ie, the physician doesn't get paid by-the-visit), so the incentives are not to see patients much at all. But in Medicaid, the more you see them, the more you cash in. "Chronic pain" is the perfect diagnosis for a physician looking to game the Medicaid system, because it's something that can go on and on and on until the patient's dead.
Lena at September 10, 2004 7:45 AM