The Dwight Stuff
President Dwight D. Eisenhower on the military-industrial complex:
Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the militaryindustrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.







Great post Amy. I wish the discussion about what our role as being the last military/economic superpower would come to the forefront of government debate. This is an area the Democrats could really differentiate from the Republicans, but sadly do not.
eric at June 21, 2005 8:36 AM
Democrats can't do that, because even though the Republicans haven't reduced the size of government the last 75 years, the statement, "We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations" is no longer true.
This is because of a bunch of things. Defense spending was huge in Ike's day - H-bomb programs were hugely expensive. Corporate outsourcing wasn't prevalent. Americans are avid consumers today, having Wal-marts everywhere to suck up spare cash. Since Ike, welfare and other programs of wealth redistribution have been heavily backed by Democrats (of course, if the public can't remember the actual voting record of Mr. Kerry or Mr. Gore, they probably won't notice any ironies presented in demagoguery).
A huge number of Americans get a government check; compare the size of the Department of Health and Human Services to DoD, then ask yourself what each department has done for you.
Eisenhower is a more complex figure than most people realize. Consider the competition between the USSR and the US; the continuous deployment of the Strategic Air Command; actual A-bomb testing, etc., and the image of a President who did little vanishes swiftly. Look up the term, "Bonus Marchers" sometime, too.
Radwaste at June 21, 2005 5:51 PM
Leave a comment