Coddle Herder
My boyfriend's enabling of his failure-to-launch 26-year-old son is seeming like a deal breaker. Though his son's very likable, he's been fired from every job he's had, including a well-paying delivery job I recently got him, after they perceived liability from his reckless, race-driving ways. His dad lent him a truck, pays the insurance, pays his cellphone bill, and keeps rescuing him on his rent. He spends his days video gaming, getting stoned, and online dating. I was looking forward to getting married, but I don't want my house at risk when his son calls for a bailout. I'm also not sure I want a man who doesn't advance his kids to independence.
--Distressed
Childhood goes so fast. It's only a matter of time before Cody is 85 and expected to post his own bail.
Your boyfriend is acting out of empathy for his son. Empathy is taken for granted as a beautiful thing, but it has a dark side. It comes from the German word, "einfuhlung," meaning "in-feeling" or "feeling into." Obviously, we can't actually tap into another person's feelings, but psychologist Lynn O'Connor explains that when we witness another person's suffering, our "empathy system is alerted, almost as if we were suffering ourselves."
Our initial flare of empathy, this "feeling into" another's suffering, happens automatically. Once we experience it, explain neuroscientists Olga Klimecki and Tania Singer, our empathy can go one of two ways: into unhealthy "empathic distress" or healthy "empathic concern."
Empathic distress is empathy that quickly turns "me-focused." We start feeling really bad about how bad we feel in the wake of our friend's empathy-triggering suffering -- to the point that we're prone to duck our uncomfortable feelings by avoiding our suffering friend. (Nice, huh?) Empathic concern, on the other hand, motivates us to channel our empathy into action. We ask ourselves, "What can I do to alleviate this person's suffering?" and then get to it.
However, even healthy empathic concern has a dark side. You can alleviate somebody's immediate suffering but ultimately hurt them long-term, like when you show them that Daddy's always there to mop up after their irresponsible behavior with a big wad of dollars.
Possibly saving your relationship starts with understanding the complicated mix here. Though Dad is taking action on his son's behalf (as per empathic concern), he's probably driven by empathic distress: a longing to immediately alleviate the pain he feels from his son being in trouble. This is pathological empathy: empathy that ultimately harms both the person it's intended to help and the person doing the helping. For example, in addition to the negative effect on your relationship, you noted (in an email replying to questions I'd asked you) that endlessly picking up his reckless, lazeballs son's tab has tanked your boyfriend's own finances.
Of course, actual helping is judicious helping, like a tough-love refusal to make the consequences of Slacker Boy's actions magically disappear. Forcing this 20-something brat to get socked with the costs is probably the only way he'll get on the path to becoming an independent, fully functioning adult.
You get this, and you told me you've brought it up to your boyfriend "like once a month," framing it in "constructive terms." That isn't working, in large part because Dad has a habit that seems to serve him (at least on the immediate level): Son crashes and burns; Dad swoops in to sweep up the wreckage, and he gets that quick hit of "feel better."
So, though your boyfriend appears to be listening when you talk, he isn't really hearing you; that is, really taking it in and then opening his mind to the possibility that you're right. Only if he really hears you will you see whether he can look critically at his enabling and accept the immediate emotional pain it takes to do what's best for his son and your relationship long-term.
Since you've been unable to get through to him, you might seek out a mediator. A mediator specializes in helping parties truly hear and understand each other. (Find one with a relationship focus at mediate.com, or Google to find free or sliding-scale services locally.) There's also a DIY option from psychotherapist Nathaniel Branden. Spend 12 hours together in a hotel room: no books, TV, smartphones, naps, or walks outside. Except for bathroom breaks, you remain together at all times. Branden told me that when all "avenues of escape are closed off," couples experience real breakthroughs in communication.
If you try either or both of these techniques, and your boyfriend still won't come around, you'll at least know you've done all you could to try to save your relationship. Ideally, the "bonds" of marriage aren't the sort that involve you risking your house if Slacky Sluffoffsky is too stoned to show up for his court hearing.
For pages and pages of "science-help" from me, buy my latest book, "Unf*ckology: A Field Guide to Living with Guts and Confidence." It lays out the PROCESS of transforming to live w/confidence.








Under no circumstances do you want to get into a joint assets situation with your boyfriend. If you live in a community property state, marriage is off the table.
People feel guilty when they feel they haven’t done right by their children. Often it comes out in ways that are even more harmful to the children than the initial breakup.
Consult a family law attorney to see what your liability might be if you go so far as to marry this guy. Unless you two are planning additional children of your own, I personally think marriage is a risk you don’t need to take.
This adult kid looks like a financial stability, and relationship poisoner.
I don’t suggest mediation, because too many people, in quite good faith, tell the mediator and you what you want to hear, and then proceed to fall back into the old habits that caused the need for mediation. They can’t help it. They are wired that way. They fully intend to make a change, but enabling behavior is a powerful psychological addiction.
Isab at December 7, 2020 8:47 AM
Isab is completely correct.
I would add that enabling behavior is one of the first things I look for in a potential relationship. It’s a red flag of emotional and intellectual weakness, and causes more problems than the obvious 26-year-old-still-living-in-the-basement scenario. It’s a sign of selfishness and a lack of self awareness, which Amy alluded to.
Dump the guy, or you’ll regret it.
Jeff at December 7, 2020 9:03 AM
I will give another thumbs up to Isab. I was just talking to my friend about her 23 year old son, and she said, “You know, my husband just never likes it when my son is mad at him.” So, basically, they never rock the boat bc they are literally afraid he will leave and never come back. Whatever you do, don’t live with someone like this. Whenever the kid screws up and you refuse to help bail him out, the father will blame you, or just take it out on you like my friend’s husband does. Cut your losses now and find a healthy relationship.
Sheep Mom at December 7, 2020 2:41 PM
Back in the day, fifty plus years ago, running rats in behavioral psych lab, I learned that Herbie--named after a fraternity brother--could learn things so fast the TA figured we were cooking the books.
The key was consistency. Do the next thing, get rewarded. Don't do the next thing, don't get rewarded. But never fail on either. Never miss a reward due or provide a reward not due. It's a bad idea to confuse the rat, or anybody, about the rules of the universe.
I'm not sure I can read white rat expressions but I had the distinct impression Herbie was getting smug.
Your boyfriend has trained his son to expect no pain from stupid, predictably stupid and counterproductive actions. The kid has learned that no amount of warning is relevant. It doesn't affect him.
The rules of his universe are that there are no punishments for stupidity, and there is no reason to learn anything about such issues.
He's going to have to run into a whole lot more sharp edges than it takes an amoeba to learn its way around to break out of his current worldview. And the first score or so of encountering the real world won't be useful because it's "unfair" and thus not an actual fact of life. No matter how obvious.
Even if your boyfriend gets a clue, he's going to be hooked up in one way or another to a guy getting into trouble daily and twice on Sunday. He'll always be fighting the impulse to help. And, whether he knows it or not, it's his fault, and one always wants to make up for one's fault.
This is trouble on steroids.
Richard Aubrey at December 7, 2020 2:57 PM
It's one thing to pull someone out of a burning car.
It's another to expect to be pulled out of a car that you knowingly climbed into and set ablaze after you stuffed your pockets with M80s.
Tay Tay at December 11, 2020 6:48 AM
Amy's columns are so perfectly and expertly written that reading the comments is usually a bummer (a bunch of angry people giving worse advice in an overly 'world is black and white' way), but I honestly think you should link your dude to this article and make sure he scrolls down to the comments. If there ever was a wake up call, it'd be found here, or in you leaving him.
Mary at December 21, 2020 11:24 AM
*especially if you care about him outside the context of your relationship
Mary at December 21, 2020 11:26 AM
Leave a comment